FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2953806963> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2953806963 endingPage "899" @default.
• W2953806963 startingPage "899" @default.
• W2953806963 abstract "<h3>Importance</h3> Diverting loop ileostomy and colonic lavage has generated much interest since it was first reported as a potential alternative to total abdominal colectomy for treating<i>Clostridium difficile</i>colitis in 2011. To our knowledge, few studies have validated the benefit reported in the initial description, and the association of this new approach with practice patterns has not been described. <h3>Objective</h3> To examine the national adoption pattern and outcomes of diverting loop ileostomy vs total abdominal colectomy as treatment for fulminant<i>C difficile</i>colitis. <h3>Design, Setting, and Participants</h3> This retrospective cohort study used data from hospitals participating in the National Inpatient Sample database across the United States from January 2011 to September 2015 and included 3021 adult patients who underwent surgery for<i>C difficile</i>colitis during the study period, comprising 2408 subtotal colectomies and 613 loop ileostomies. The data were analyzed between November 2018 and April 2019. <h3>Exposures</h3> Loop ileostomy as surgery of choice. <h3>Main Outcomes and Measures</h3> In-hospital mortality. <h3>Results</h3> Of 2408 participants, 1416 (58.8%) were women, 1781 (78.4%) were white, and 627 (21.6%) were individuals of color and the mean (SD) age was 68.2 (14.8) years. During the overall study period, 613 patients (20.28%) underwent diverting loop ileostomy without total abdominal colectomy. The annual proportion of patients undergoing only diversion increased from 11.16% in 2011 to 25.30% in 2015. Significantly more loop ileostomies were performed within the first day of hospitalization, in contrast to subtotal colectomies (23.31% vs 12.21%;<i>P</i> < .01). There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality rates between the 2 groups (25.98% vs 31.18%;<i>P</i> = .28). <h3>Conclusions and Relevance</h3> This study demonstrates the adoption of diverting loop ileostomy to treat<i>C difficile</i>colitis across the United States. While fulminant<i>C difficile</i>colitis remains a condition with high mortality rates, no significant difference in this outcome was observed between loop ileostomy and total abdominal colectomy. Loop ileostomy may represent a viable surgical alternative to total abdominal colectomy, although the grounds for selection of treatment need to be clarified." @default.
• W2953806963 created "2019-07-12" @default.
• W2953806963 creator A5007815655 @default.
• W2953806963 creator A5010278146 @default.
• W2953806963 creator A5035348356 @default.
• W2953806963 creator A5084286768 @default.
• W2953806963 date "2019-10-01" @default.
• W2953806963 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2953806963 title "Trends in Diverting Loop Ileostomy vs Total Abdominal Colectomy as Surgical Management for<i>Clostridium difficile</i>Colitis" @default.
• W2953806963 cites W118081456 @default.
• W2953806963 cites W1924979074 @default.
• W2953806963 cites W1968256786 @default.
• W2953806963 cites W1976675603 @default.
• W2953806963 cites W2000979478 @default.
• W2953806963 cites W2015757660 @default.
• W2953806963 cites W2043789437 @default.
• W2953806963 cites W2058867048 @default.
• W2953806963 cites W2064691418 @default.
• W2953806963 cites W2085560274 @default.
• W2953806963 cites W2093158452 @default.
• W2953806963 cites W2101233913 @default.
• W2953806963 cites W2104518766 @default.
• W2953806963 cites W2120924347 @default.
• W2953806963 cites W2126712451 @default.
• W2953806963 cites W2139702905 @default.
• W2953806963 cites W2142259279 @default.
• W2953806963 cites W2154275749 @default.
• W2953806963 cites W2499439091 @default.
• W2953806963 cites W2528784157 @default.
• W2953806963 cites W2553087364 @default.
• W2953806963 cites W2606325305 @default.
• W2953806963 cites W2893182689 @default.
• W2953806963 doi "https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.2141" @default.
• W2953806963 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6613305" @default.
• W2953806963 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31268492" @default.
• W2953806963 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2953806963 type Work @default.
• W2953806963 sameAs 2953806963 @default.
• W2953806963 citedByCount "36" @default.
• W2953806963 countsByYear W29538069632019 @default.
• W2953806963 countsByYear W29538069632020 @default.
• W2953806963 countsByYear W29538069632021 @default.
• W2953806963 countsByYear W29538069632022 @default.
• W2953806963 countsByYear W29538069632023 @default.
• W2953806963 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2953806963 hasAuthorship W2953806963A5007815655 @default.
• W2953806963 hasAuthorship W2953806963A5010278146 @default.
• W2953806963 hasAuthorship W2953806963A5035348356 @default.
• W2953806963 hasAuthorship W2953806963A5084286768 @default.
• W2953806963 hasBestOaLocation W29538069631 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConcept C2775862500 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConcept C2776667177 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConcept C2778773085 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConcept C2780120127 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConcept C2780479503 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConcept C2909592510 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConcept C2994496256 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConcept C501593827 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConcept C89423630 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConceptScore W2953806963C126322002 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConceptScore W2953806963C141071460 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConceptScore W2953806963C167135981 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConceptScore W2953806963C2775862500 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConceptScore W2953806963C2776667177 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConceptScore W2953806963C2778773085 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConceptScore W2953806963C2779134260 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConceptScore W2953806963C2780120127 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConceptScore W2953806963C2780479503 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConceptScore W2953806963C2909592510 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConceptScore W2953806963C2994496256 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConceptScore W2953806963C501593827 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConceptScore W2953806963C61434518 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConceptScore W2953806963C71924100 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConceptScore W2953806963C86803240 @default.
• W2953806963 hasConceptScore W2953806963C89423630 @default.
• W2953806963 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W2953806963 hasLocation W29538069631 @default.
• W2953806963 hasLocation W29538069632 @default.
• W2953806963 hasLocation W29538069633 @default.
• W2953806963 hasOpenAccess W2953806963 @default.
• W2953806963 hasPrimaryLocation W29538069631 @default.
• W2953806963 hasRelatedWork W2050132609 @default.
• W2953806963 hasRelatedWork W2082768313 @default.
• W2953806963 hasRelatedWork W2125971205 @default.
• W2953806963 hasRelatedWork W2324207276 @default.
• W2953806963 hasRelatedWork W2324315826 @default.
• W2953806963 hasRelatedWork W2528784157 @default.
• W2953806963 hasRelatedWork W2588574326 @default.
• W2953806963 hasRelatedWork W2986561249 @default.
• W2953806963 hasRelatedWork W2987019941 @default.
• W2953806963 hasRelatedWork W4252760336 @default.

• next