FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2954379756> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2954379756 abstract "Introduction. The intervertebral disc is considered the main source of pain syndrome in degenerative diseases of the spine. The methods of laser, mechanical and cold plasma nucleotomy are widely used in Russia and are included into the system of high-tech medical care. The most promising annuloplasty methods are less known and have only recently been introduced into the national surgical practice. patients’ selection criteria and surgical procedure choice are not clearly defined and the information about annuloplasty in the national literature is practically not presented. Purpose — to conduct the comparative analysis for efficiency of paracentetic nucleoplasty and radiofrequency annuloplasty for discogenic pain and to identify the factors determining the surgery outcomes. Materials and Methods. The authors performed a retrospective cohort study. patients were divided into two groups: 107 patients underwent cold plasma nucleoplasty (Np), 72 patients received radiofrequency annuloplasty (RFap) at one or several levels. evaluation of outcomes was based on the dynamics of the NRS-11 digital pain scale and the Oswestry index (OdI). Positive results were recognized with decrease of NRS-11 index by 50% (or NRc-11 <4) and OdI by 20% from the original (or OdI <20%) when the outcome was preserved for 6 or more months postoperatively. To identify the factors influencing the outcome the authors assessed the following criteria prior to surgery: clinical findings (acute, chronic or recurrent pain syndrome), severity and prevalence of disc degeneration at the level of intervention and in adjacent segments, the use of other interventional diagnostic methods for excluding other sources of pain. Results . In results of the procedures the authors reported a decrease of indices in both groups (p<0.001) in the absence of significant differences between the groups (p = 0.672). However, but the number of positive outcomes in the RFap group was higher than in the Np group — 49 (68.1%) and 55 (51.4%) respectively. Significant prognostic factors in the Np group were acute character of the pain syndrome (Spearman ρ = 0.252, p = 0.014), fewer operated levels (ρ = -0.304, p<0.001); in both groups such factors were failure of other procedures (Np ρ = 0.413, p<0.001; RFap ρ = 0.464, p<0.001) and the degree of disc degeneration of adjacent segments (Np ρ = -0.387, p<0.001; RFap ρ = -0.297, p<0.001). With regression analysis the best results were observed under the criteria “failure of other procedures”, for Np (OR 0.77 at 95% cI (0.682-0.857) and for RFap (OR 0.81, 95% cI (0.701-0.924)). Conclusion . Both methods of cold plasma nucleoplasty and radiofrequency annuloplasty demonstrate positive and similar outcomes provided the discogenic character of the pain syndrome has been defined correctly. The most significant is the exclusion of other sources of pain by diagnostic blockades, especially for patients with chronic pain syndrome and advanced multi-level lesion of the spine segments." @default.
• W2954379756 created "2019-07-12" @default.
• W2954379756 creator A5007087565 @default.
• W2954379756 creator A5031414050 @default.
• W2954379756 creator A5054260355 @default.
• W2954379756 creator A5069149478 @default.
• W2954379756 creator A5077637707 @default.
• W2954379756 date "2018-07-06" @default.
• W2954379756 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2954379756 title "COLD PLASMA NUCLEOPLASTY VERSUS RADIOFREQUENCY ANNULOPLASTY FOR DISCOGENIC PAIN SYNDROME: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EFFICACY" @default.
• W2954379756 cites W188719653 @default.
• W2954379756 cites W1966188170 @default.
• W2954379756 cites W1981980293 @default.
• W2954379756 cites W1983086809 @default.
• W2954379756 cites W2009600127 @default.
• W2954379756 cites W2021184308 @default.
• W2954379756 cites W2036861013 @default.
• W2954379756 cites W2042076683 @default.
• W2954379756 cites W2070974884 @default.
• W2954379756 cites W2078990683 @default.
• W2954379756 cites W2079910875 @default.
• W2954379756 cites W2091734353 @default.
• W2954379756 cites W2096584418 @default.
• W2954379756 cites W2108541240 @default.
• W2954379756 cites W2116760759 @default.
• W2954379756 cites W2125429923 @default.
• W2954379756 cites W2150262085 @default.
• W2954379756 cites W2163245468 @default.
• W2954379756 cites W2176119643 @default.
• W2954379756 cites W2177131320 @default.
• W2954379756 cites W2320958325 @default.
• W2954379756 cites W2328424309 @default.
• W2954379756 cites W2531337141 @default.
• W2954379756 cites W2605786062 @default.
• W2954379756 cites W2612893562 @default.
• W2954379756 cites W2972379515 @default.
• W2954379756 doi "https://doi.org/10.21823/2311-2905-2018-24-2-49-58" @default.
• W2954379756 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2954379756 type Work @default.
• W2954379756 sameAs 2954379756 @default.
• W2954379756 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2954379756 countsByYear W29543797562021 @default.
• W2954379756 countsByYear W29543797562022 @default.
• W2954379756 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2954379756 hasAuthorship W2954379756A5007087565 @default.
• W2954379756 hasAuthorship W2954379756A5031414050 @default.
• W2954379756 hasAuthorship W2954379756A5054260355 @default.
• W2954379756 hasAuthorship W2954379756A5069149478 @default.
• W2954379756 hasAuthorship W2954379756A5077637707 @default.
• W2954379756 hasBestOaLocation W29543797561 @default.
• W2954379756 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2954379756 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2954379756 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2954379756 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2954379756 hasConcept C2775998654 @default.
• W2954379756 hasConcept C2776501849 @default.
• W2954379756 hasConcept C2780907711 @default.
• W2954379756 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2954379756 hasConceptScore W2954379756C141071460 @default.
• W2954379756 hasConceptScore W2954379756C142724271 @default.
• W2954379756 hasConceptScore W2954379756C167135981 @default.
• W2954379756 hasConceptScore W2954379756C204787440 @default.
• W2954379756 hasConceptScore W2954379756C2775998654 @default.
• W2954379756 hasConceptScore W2954379756C2776501849 @default.
• W2954379756 hasConceptScore W2954379756C2780907711 @default.
• W2954379756 hasConceptScore W2954379756C71924100 @default.
• W2954379756 hasLocation W29543797561 @default.
• W2954379756 hasOpenAccess W2954379756 @default.
• W2954379756 hasPrimaryLocation W29543797561 @default.
• W2954379756 hasRelatedWork W1982754264 @default.
• W2954379756 hasRelatedWork W2055717420 @default.
• W2954379756 hasRelatedWork W2081872483 @default.
• W2954379756 hasRelatedWork W2321941333 @default.
• W2954379756 hasRelatedWork W2533558478 @default.
• W2954379756 hasRelatedWork W2803435576 @default.
• W2954379756 hasRelatedWork W2977919527 @default.
• W2954379756 hasRelatedWork W2996473246 @default.
• W2954379756 hasRelatedWork W3031445745 @default.
• W2954379756 hasRelatedWork W3164046577 @default.
• W2954379756 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2954379756 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2954379756 magId "2954379756" @default.
• W2954379756 workType "article" @default.