FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2954406412> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2954406412 endingPage "252" @default.
• W2954406412 startingPage "243" @default.
• W2954406412 abstract "Purpose A large proportion of preclinical or translational studies using radiation have poor replicability. For a study involving radiation exposure to be replicable, interpretable, and comparable, its experimental methodology must be well reported, particularly in terms of irradiation protocol, including the amount, rate, quality, and geometry of radiation delivery. Here we perform the first large-scale literature review of the current state of reporting of essential experimental physics and dosimetry details in the scientific literature. Methods and Materials For 1758 peer-reviewed articles from 469 journals, we evaluated the reporting of basic experimental physics and dosimetry details recommended by the authoritative National Institute of Standards and Technology symposium. Results We demonstrate that although some physics and dosimetry parameters, such as dose, source type, and energy, are well reported, the majority are not. Furthermore, highly cited journals and articles are systematically more likely to be lacking experimental details related to the irradiation protocol. Conclusions These findings show a crucial deficiency in the reporting of basic experimental details and severely affect the reproducibility and translatability of a large proportion of radiation biology studies. A large proportion of preclinical or translational studies using radiation have poor replicability. For a study involving radiation exposure to be replicable, interpretable, and comparable, its experimental methodology must be well reported, particularly in terms of irradiation protocol, including the amount, rate, quality, and geometry of radiation delivery. Here we perform the first large-scale literature review of the current state of reporting of essential experimental physics and dosimetry details in the scientific literature. For 1758 peer-reviewed articles from 469 journals, we evaluated the reporting of basic experimental physics and dosimetry details recommended by the authoritative National Institute of Standards and Technology symposium. We demonstrate that although some physics and dosimetry parameters, such as dose, source type, and energy, are well reported, the majority are not. Furthermore, highly cited journals and articles are systematically more likely to be lacking experimental details related to the irradiation protocol. These findings show a crucial deficiency in the reporting of basic experimental details and severely affect the reproducibility and translatability of a large proportion of radiation biology studies." @default.
• W2954406412 created "2019-07-12" @default.
• W2954406412 creator A5022533285 @default.
• W2954406412 creator A5039370403 @default.
• W2954406412 creator A5039930129 @default.
• W2954406412 creator A5040557733 @default.
• W2954406412 creator A5045780426 @default.
• W2954406412 creator A5048257046 @default.
• W2954406412 creator A5050995921 @default.
• W2954406412 creator A5052571778 @default.
• W2954406412 date "2020-02-01" @default.
• W2954406412 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2954406412 title "A Dose of Reality: How 20 Years of Incomplete Physics and Dosimetry Reporting in Radiobiology Studies May Have Contributed to the Reproducibility Crisis" @default.
• W2954406412 cites W1549329940 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W1825120118 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W1985153638 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W1987777080 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W2002968221 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W2008621428 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W2011793809 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W2018371543 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W2050034605 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W2100234821 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W2101076164 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W2130927464 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W2132370569 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W2133470246 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W2151822656 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W2154241366 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W2170746870 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W2184212151 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W2233416869 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W2288756428 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W2325369455 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W2347020928 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W2406493898 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W2504030762 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W2578646131 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W2765198187 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W2766363222 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W2791403374 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W2802211301 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W2841729505 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W2884971017 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W2899457310 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W2915478882 @default.
• W2954406412 cites W585341442 @default.
• W2954406412 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.2545" @default.
• W2954406412 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31288053" @default.
• W2954406412 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W2954406412 type Work @default.
• W2954406412 sameAs 2954406412 @default.
• W2954406412 citedByCount "52" @default.
• W2954406412 countsByYear W29544064122020 @default.
• W2954406412 countsByYear W29544064122021 @default.
• W2954406412 countsByYear W29544064122022 @default.
• W2954406412 countsByYear W29544064122023 @default.
• W2954406412 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2954406412 hasAuthorship W2954406412A5022533285 @default.
• W2954406412 hasAuthorship W2954406412A5039370403 @default.
• W2954406412 hasAuthorship W2954406412A5039930129 @default.
• W2954406412 hasAuthorship W2954406412A5040557733 @default.
• W2954406412 hasAuthorship W2954406412A5045780426 @default.
• W2954406412 hasAuthorship W2954406412A5048257046 @default.
• W2954406412 hasAuthorship W2954406412A5050995921 @default.
• W2954406412 hasAuthorship W2954406412A5052571778 @default.
• W2954406412 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2954406412 hasConcept C125118446 @default.
• W2954406412 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2954406412 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2954406412 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2954406412 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2954406412 hasConcept C2780385302 @default.
• W2954406412 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2954406412 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2954406412 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W2954406412 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2954406412 hasConcept C75088862 @default.
• W2954406412 hasConcept C9893847 @default.
• W2954406412 hasConceptScore W2954406412C105795698 @default.
• W2954406412 hasConceptScore W2954406412C125118446 @default.
• W2954406412 hasConceptScore W2954406412C126838900 @default.
• W2954406412 hasConceptScore W2954406412C142724271 @default.
• W2954406412 hasConceptScore W2954406412C19527891 @default.
• W2954406412 hasConceptScore W2954406412C204787440 @default.
• W2954406412 hasConceptScore W2954406412C2780385302 @default.
• W2954406412 hasConceptScore W2954406412C2989005 @default.
• W2954406412 hasConceptScore W2954406412C33923547 @default.
• W2954406412 hasConceptScore W2954406412C509974204 @default.
• W2954406412 hasConceptScore W2954406412C71924100 @default.
• W2954406412 hasConceptScore W2954406412C75088862 @default.
• W2954406412 hasConceptScore W2954406412C9893847 @default.
• W2954406412 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2954406412 hasLocation W29544064121 @default.
• W2954406412 hasLocation W29544064122 @default.
• W2954406412 hasOpenAccess W2954406412 @default.
• W2954406412 hasPrimaryLocation W29544064121 @default.
• W2954406412 hasRelatedWork W1922237249 @default.

• next