Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2954756871> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 55 of
55
with 100 items per page.
- W2954756871 endingPage "445" @default.
- W2954756871 startingPage "442" @default.
- W2954756871 abstract "Reviewed by: Red Modernism: American Poetry and the Spirit of Communism by Mark Steven Jasper Bernes, Managing Editor Red Modernism: American Poetry and the Spirit of Communism. Mark Steven. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press, 2017. Pp. 264. $49.95 (cloth); $49.95 (eBook). The revolutionary wave that swept across Europe after the end of the World War I left its mark far and wide. Its effects were political and economic first and foremost, but no aspect of interwar society was untouched. As the hundredth anniversary of the 1917 Russian Revolution recedes, we should pause not only to remember the less mythologized revolutions, near-revolutions, and insurrections that swelled alongside it—in Germany, Hungary, and Italy, not to mention Ireland, Egypt, and Mexico—but also the more diffuse social and aesthetic transformations whose effects were felt across the globe. Bred by if not born from the social breakdowns and liberated passions of World War I and its aftermath, modernism is the aesthetic sibling of the revolutionary wave of 1917–1923. The two phenomena display all the resemblance and affinity, difference and enmity, that we should expect from siblings. It is much easier, however, to say that the linkage between modernism and interwar revolutionary communism exists than to specify the character of the linkage. As yet, we lack an account of the relationship that is both systematic and definitive. Some fifty years ago, Renato Poggioli, in his Theory of the Avant-Garde, made the helpful observation that in the nineteenth century avant-garde referred to projects that were cultural and political at once, with the separation between the two sorts of vanguard action occurring much later. But that genealogical linkage does not tell us much about the linkage circa 1920, nor does it necessarily bear on the question of modernism, which may or may not be synonymous with or a parent category for the avantgarde. More recently, Martin Puchner, in Poetry of the Revolution, examined the grammatical and rhetorical character of the manifesto form, staple of both political and aesthetic revolutionaries, arguing that the declarative document which had become de rigeur for twentieth-century modernist (and avant-garde) groups depends on speech acts derived from Marx and Engel's Communist Manifesto. While compelling, Puchner's formalist account lacks historical specificity, failing to offer much in the way of periodization, and linking two textual archives without much attention to the mediating economic and social history. T. J. Clark, in his Farewell to an Idea, offers a more historical articulation, defining modernism as socialism's shadow, part of a struggle to imagine modernity otherwise during a period in which, because of the unfinished character of modernization, such an otherwise still existed.1 The value of Clark's account, which I have come to accept as definitive, is that it allows you to say not only what modernism was, but when it ended and why. Modernism was over once modernization had been definitively accomplished, [End Page 442] bringing to a close the possibility of another modernity. Still, Farewell to an Idea is unsystematic and episodic by design and the book in which it appears has so many other aims that it is unlikely to settle the matter. Any one of these accounts must confront the difficulty of saying something comprehensive, given the vast range of national traditions, genres, and historical periods that modernism comprises. One can easily make one's case for a deep linkage between communism and modernism with a reading of surrealism and Dada, suprematism and constructivism, but more challenging archives exist. The most difficult may be that of Anglo-American modernism, parts of which display a notoriously reactionary politics. In this regard, Joel Nickels's 2012 book Poetry of the Possible did crucial work, demonstrating that writers such as Laura Riding, Wyndham Lewis, and Wallace Stevens had a view of modernism's aesthetic possibility that crucially depended upon the social possibility explored by insurgent, self-organizing proletarians. Nickels's book offers perhaps the most rigorous account of the linkage, but was modest in its claims, not intending to offer an account of modernism as such. Enter Mark Steven, whose Red Modernism follows Nickels into the same terrain and promises to amplify..." @default.
- W2954756871 created "2019-07-12" @default.
- W2954756871 creator A5030025788 @default.
- W2954756871 date "2019-01-01" @default.
- W2954756871 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W2954756871 title "Red Modernism: American Poetry and the Spirit of Communism by Mark Steven" @default.
- W2954756871 cites W2097841344 @default.
- W2954756871 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/mod.2019.0025" @default.
- W2954756871 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
- W2954756871 type Work @default.
- W2954756871 sameAs 2954756871 @default.
- W2954756871 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2954756871 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2954756871 hasAuthorship W2954756871A5030025788 @default.
- W2954756871 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
- W2954756871 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
- W2954756871 hasConcept C164913051 @default.
- W2954756871 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2954756871 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2954756871 hasConcept C2776242748 @default.
- W2954756871 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
- W2954756871 hasConcept C542948173 @default.
- W2954756871 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W2954756871 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
- W2954756871 hasConceptScore W2954756871C124952713 @default.
- W2954756871 hasConceptScore W2954756871C142362112 @default.
- W2954756871 hasConceptScore W2954756871C164913051 @default.
- W2954756871 hasConceptScore W2954756871C17744445 @default.
- W2954756871 hasConceptScore W2954756871C199539241 @default.
- W2954756871 hasConceptScore W2954756871C2776242748 @default.
- W2954756871 hasConceptScore W2954756871C52119013 @default.
- W2954756871 hasConceptScore W2954756871C542948173 @default.
- W2954756871 hasConceptScore W2954756871C94625758 @default.
- W2954756871 hasConceptScore W2954756871C95457728 @default.
- W2954756871 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W2954756871 hasLocation W29547568711 @default.
- W2954756871 hasOpenAccess W2954756871 @default.
- W2954756871 hasPrimaryLocation W29547568711 @default.
- W2954756871 hasRelatedWork W2350215865 @default.
- W2954756871 hasRelatedWork W2359305390 @default.
- W2954756871 hasRelatedWork W2360980759 @default.
- W2954756871 hasRelatedWork W2370749207 @default.
- W2954756871 hasRelatedWork W2377785499 @default.
- W2954756871 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W2954756871 hasRelatedWork W2810232222 @default.
- W2954756871 hasRelatedWork W2946777586 @default.
- W2954756871 hasRelatedWork W638639555 @default.
- W2954756871 hasRelatedWork W2146717352 @default.
- W2954756871 hasVolume "26" @default.
- W2954756871 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2954756871 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2954756871 magId "2954756871" @default.
- W2954756871 workType "article" @default.