FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2954889557> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2954889557 endingPage "406" @default.
• W2954889557 startingPage "398" @default.
• W2954889557 abstract "Abstract Background The “failure of success” theory predicts that as subsequent generations of older adults retain more teeth, those additional teeth will experience more oral disease like root surface caries. The theory in relation to root surface caries has never been tested in a cross‐generational study. This study aims to compare root surface caries across generations of South Australian older adults to test the theory and explore risk indicators for root surface caries. Methods Data were from the baseline of two South Australian studies separated by 22 years. In both studies, stratified random samples of people aged 60+ years from Adelaide and Mount Gambier were recruited. Dental examinations were performed by trained and calibrated dentists. One of the dental examiners from the earlier study was the gold standard examiner in the second study. Risk indicators included behavioural factors, clinical oral conditions, sociodemographic and socioeconomic status. Root surface caries was assessed as untreated root surface caries (root decayed surfaces [ RDS ]), treated root surface caries (root filled surfaces [ RFS ]) and treated or untreated root surface caries (root decayed and filled surfaces [ RDFS ]) and was presented as the prevalence and summed count. Multivariable models for Poisson and negative binomial distributions were used to estimate prevalence ratios ( PR ) and mean ratios ( MR ), respectively, and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI ). Results The current generation of South Australian older adults has significantly lower RDS ( PR [95% CI ] = 0.65 [0.47‐0.89]; MR [95% CI ] = 0.51 [0.35‐0.73]) and RDFS ( PR [95% CI ] = 0.84 [0.71‐0.99]; MR [95% CI ] = 0.76 [0.65‐0.90]) than the previous generation. The RFS in the previous and current generation was similar. Gingival recession, irregular brushing, dental visiting for a problem and smoking were the indicators for RDS , while age, gingival recession, tooth brushing frequency, time since last dental visit and reason of visiting were the indicators for RFS or RDFS . Conclusions These results do not support the “failure of success” theory in relation to root surface caries among South Australian older adults. Despite the higher number of teeth retained, the current generation of older adults has less root surface caries than the previous generation. Behavioural factors remain the indicators of root surface caries across the generations." @default.
• W2954889557 created "2019-07-12" @default.
• W2954889557 creator A5012483610 @default.
• W2954889557 creator A5018392840 @default.
• W2954889557 creator A5022355517 @default.
• W2954889557 creator A5045754309 @default.
• W2954889557 creator A5051016307 @default.
• W2954889557 creator A5063064897 @default.
• W2954889557 creator A5068194630 @default.
• W2954889557 creator A5079313801 @default.
• W2954889557 date "2019-07-04" @default.
• W2954889557 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W2954889557 title "The prevalence and severity of root surface caries across Australian generations" @default.
• W2954889557 cites W1827722585 @default.
• W2954889557 cites W1967705747 @default.
• W2954889557 cites W1993056553 @default.
• W2954889557 cites W1998887285 @default.
• W2954889557 cites W2009436962 @default.
• W2954889557 cites W2014572669 @default.
• W2954889557 cites W2023950278 @default.
• W2954889557 cites W2029641349 @default.
• W2954889557 cites W2064951964 @default.
• W2954889557 cites W2072092171 @default.
• W2954889557 cites W2080328497 @default.
• W2954889557 cites W2092689367 @default.
• W2954889557 cites W2093567254 @default.
• W2954889557 cites W2137362121 @default.
• W2954889557 cites W2148806309 @default.
• W2954889557 cites W2161121429 @default.
• W2954889557 cites W2613067860 @default.
• W2954889557 cites W4246942919 @default.
• W2954889557 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12459" @default.
• W2954889557 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31273824" @default.
• W2954889557 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2954889557 type Work @default.
• W2954889557 sameAs 2954889557 @default.
• W2954889557 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2954889557 countsByYear W29548895572020 @default.
• W2954889557 countsByYear W29548895572022 @default.
• W2954889557 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2954889557 hasAuthorship W2954889557A5012483610 @default.
• W2954889557 hasAuthorship W2954889557A5018392840 @default.
• W2954889557 hasAuthorship W2954889557A5022355517 @default.
• W2954889557 hasAuthorship W2954889557A5045754309 @default.
• W2954889557 hasAuthorship W2954889557A5051016307 @default.
• W2954889557 hasAuthorship W2954889557A5063064897 @default.
• W2954889557 hasAuthorship W2954889557A5068194630 @default.
• W2954889557 hasAuthorship W2954889557A5079313801 @default.
• W2954889557 hasBestOaLocation W29548895572 @default.
• W2954889557 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2954889557 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2954889557 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2954889557 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2954889557 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2954889557 hasConcept C2992547766 @default.
• W2954889557 hasConcept C2992672162 @default.
• W2954889557 hasConcept C3020334819 @default.
• W2954889557 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2954889557 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2954889557 hasConcept C73269764 @default.
• W2954889557 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2954889557 hasConceptScore W2954889557C126322002 @default.
• W2954889557 hasConceptScore W2954889557C144024400 @default.
• W2954889557 hasConceptScore W2954889557C149923435 @default.
• W2954889557 hasConceptScore W2954889557C199343813 @default.
• W2954889557 hasConceptScore W2954889557C2908647359 @default.
• W2954889557 hasConceptScore W2954889557C2992547766 @default.
• W2954889557 hasConceptScore W2954889557C2992672162 @default.
• W2954889557 hasConceptScore W2954889557C3020334819 @default.
• W2954889557 hasConceptScore W2954889557C44249647 @default.
• W2954889557 hasConceptScore W2954889557C71924100 @default.
• W2954889557 hasConceptScore W2954889557C73269764 @default.
• W2954889557 hasConceptScore W2954889557C99454951 @default.
• W2954889557 hasFunder F4320334705 @default.
• W2954889557 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2954889557 hasLocation W29548895571 @default.
• W2954889557 hasLocation W29548895572 @default.
• W2954889557 hasLocation W29548895573 @default.
• W2954889557 hasLocation W29548895574 @default.
• W2954889557 hasLocation W29548895575 @default.
• W2954889557 hasLocation W29548895576 @default.
• W2954889557 hasOpenAccess W2954889557 @default.
• W2954889557 hasPrimaryLocation W29548895571 @default.
• W2954889557 hasRelatedWork W1629804955 @default.
• W2954889557 hasRelatedWork W2068404918 @default.
• W2954889557 hasRelatedWork W2212190803 @default.
• W2954889557 hasRelatedWork W2358476701 @default.
• W2954889557 hasRelatedWork W2364399734 @default.
• W2954889557 hasRelatedWork W2803313041 @default.
• W2954889557 hasRelatedWork W2885711718 @default.
• W2954889557 hasRelatedWork W3145676042 @default.
• W2954889557 hasRelatedWork W177036055 @default.
• W2954889557 hasRelatedWork W2289758858 @default.
• W2954889557 hasVolume "47" @default.
• W2954889557 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2954889557 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2954889557 magId "2954889557" @default.
• W2954889557 workType "article" @default.