Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2954894013> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2954894013 abstract "Introduction Bacterial wound infections are a danger to both military and civilian populations. The nature of injury and infection associated with combat related wounds are important in guiding antibiotic prophylaxis and empiric treatment guidelines. Materials and methods The isolates were screened for drug-resistance by the MicroScan Walkaway Plus System using either the Negative Breakpoint Combo Panel (NBCP) 30 or 34 or Positive Breakpoint Combo Panel (PBPC) 20 or 23. Isolates with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ≥8 μg/mL to imipenem and/or meropenem were tested for both carbapenemase production using the CarbaNP test and real-time PCR to determine molecular resistance mechanisms. Plasmid conjugation analysis was performed to define potential for horizontal gene transfer. Results We characterized 634 bacterial wound isolates collected from September 2013 to December 2017 from patients seen at a Philippine military tertiary hospital presenting with combat or non-combat injuries [354 (military) and 280 (civilians)]. Staphylococcus aureus was the most predominant bacterial species isolated from wounds in both populations (104/634, 16%). A variety of Gram-negative bacterial species comprised 442/634 (70%) of the isolates identified, with the most prevalent shown to be Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Acinetobacter sp. Carbapenemase production was detected in 34/442 (8%) Gram-negative isolates. Testing for molecular resistance mechanisms showed 32/34 (17 military, 15 civilian) wound isolates were blaNDM positive and 2 were blaVIM positive, with the two blaVIM isolates found in the civilian population. Plasmid conjugation of 14 blaNDM and 2 blaVIM positive wound isolates representatives showed 2/16 (13%) produced E. coli J53 transconjugants (E. coli from a civilian; E. cloacae from a military). Conclusion We describe in this study the wound bacterial and antibiotic resistance profile in the military (combat vs non-combat associated) and civilian population. We observed that, with the exception of Acinetobacter sp., resistance of prevalent Gram-negative bacterial species to imipenem or meropenem were not significantly different between the military and civilian populations. We also presented data on the prevalent bacterial species isolated from both combat and non-combat wounds in a military tertiary care hospital setting as well as the carbapenemase-encoding gene primarily responsible for carbapenem resistance as well as evidence of horizontal transfer via mobile genetic elements. Clinicians may use this information to guide empiric antibiotic coverage for the predominant organisms if wound culture results are not readily available.A prospective, longitudinal evaluation of the wound bacterial profile documenting the changing bacterial flora using higher resolution molecular strategies can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the diversity, composition, and abundance of bacterial composition of the wound microbial community from the time of injury, during the course of evacuation from the field to higher level of care facilities, and up to wound resolution." @default.
- W2954894013 created "2019-07-12" @default.
- W2954894013 creator A5002562972 @default.
- W2954894013 creator A5014798008 @default.
- W2954894013 creator A5021141579 @default.
- W2954894013 creator A5031068233 @default.
- W2954894013 creator A5036040672 @default.
- W2954894013 creator A5036307414 @default.
- W2954894013 creator A5049223432 @default.
- W2954894013 creator A5052333025 @default.
- W2954894013 creator A5063909612 @default.
- W2954894013 creator A5066080513 @default.
- W2954894013 creator A5084186590 @default.
- W2954894013 date "2019-06-27" @default.
- W2954894013 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
- W2954894013 title "Comparison of Carbapenem-Resistant Microbial Pathogens in Combat and Non-combat Wounds of Military and Civilian Patients Seen at a Tertiary Military Hospital, Philippines (2013–2017)" @default.
- W2954894013 cites W1799147355 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W1971521079 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W1981891935 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W1983587094 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2007221427 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2010740063 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2018433882 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2027995107 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2028487827 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2029711384 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2030501295 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2035677093 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2058125010 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2069058065 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2073697896 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2104442340 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2112203749 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2113898837 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2119174959 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2121338329 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2123529686 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2128593037 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2128956519 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2145041871 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2146272590 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2152470727 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2162019347 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2163697617 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2179036997 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2275273087 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2319391774 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2320916269 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2345473542 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2474463459 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2488450895 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2511861510 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2528613443 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2533596066 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2602667098 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2616809388 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2719956794 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2725324739 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2737566459 @default.
- W2954894013 cites W2801139450 @default.
- W2954894013 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usz148" @default.
- W2954894013 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31247085" @default.
- W2954894013 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
- W2954894013 type Work @default.
- W2954894013 sameAs 2954894013 @default.
- W2954894013 citedByCount "3" @default.
- W2954894013 countsByYear W29548940132020 @default.
- W2954894013 countsByYear W29548940132022 @default.
- W2954894013 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2954894013 hasAuthorship W2954894013A5002562972 @default.
- W2954894013 hasAuthorship W2954894013A5014798008 @default.
- W2954894013 hasAuthorship W2954894013A5021141579 @default.
- W2954894013 hasAuthorship W2954894013A5031068233 @default.
- W2954894013 hasAuthorship W2954894013A5036040672 @default.
- W2954894013 hasAuthorship W2954894013A5036307414 @default.
- W2954894013 hasAuthorship W2954894013A5049223432 @default.
- W2954894013 hasAuthorship W2954894013A5052333025 @default.
- W2954894013 hasAuthorship W2954894013A5063909612 @default.
- W2954894013 hasAuthorship W2954894013A5066080513 @default.
- W2954894013 hasAuthorship W2954894013A5084186590 @default.
- W2954894013 hasBestOaLocation W29548940131 @default.
- W2954894013 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2954894013 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2954894013 hasConcept C2776685102 @default.
- W2954894013 hasConcept C2776746162 @default.
- W2954894013 hasConcept C2779072820 @default.
- W2954894013 hasConcept C501593827 @default.
- W2954894013 hasConcept C544453697 @default.
- W2954894013 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2954894013 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2954894013 hasConcept C89423630 @default.
- W2954894013 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
- W2954894013 hasConceptScore W2954894013C17744445 @default.
- W2954894013 hasConceptScore W2954894013C199539241 @default.
- W2954894013 hasConceptScore W2954894013C2776685102 @default.
- W2954894013 hasConceptScore W2954894013C2776746162 @default.
- W2954894013 hasConceptScore W2954894013C2779072820 @default.
- W2954894013 hasConceptScore W2954894013C501593827 @default.
- W2954894013 hasConceptScore W2954894013C544453697 @default.
- W2954894013 hasConceptScore W2954894013C71924100 @default.