Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2955065478> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 74 of
74
with 100 items per page.
- W2955065478 endingPage "S264" @default.
- W2955065478 startingPage "S263" @default.
- W2955065478 abstract "Since its foundation in 2006, the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) had increased its capacity for evaluating the value of health technologies in the United States. However, despite the potential significant impact of assessment outcomes on the perceived value of new products, best practices for engaging with ICER have not been established. The objective of this presentation is to outline the evolution of ICER review processes and to recommend how to best leverage evaluations as opportunities to communicate the value of health technologies. Based on a systematic review of publicly available ICER evaluation materials for assessments performed from 2008 to 2018, we summarized ICER’s evaluation framework and highlight key procedural changes. Reviews conducted in 2018 were critically assessed to summarize the influence of stakeholder comments on ICER’s reporting and conclusions. During the 10 years, the number of ICER evaluations increased from 1 to 12 per year, and the stakeholder engagement approach shifted; opportunities for public comments (1) and “open input” (2) were introduced in 2011 and 2016, respectively. Evaluations in rare indications were introduced in 2016, comprising 50% of evaluations in 2018. In 2018, 6 of 12 assessments reported ≥1 evaluated intervention to be cost-effective under the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio threshold of $150,000. A higher proportion of rare indications were concluded not cost-effective (4/6 vs. 2/6). Although all 40 participating manufacturers had at least one comment addressed by ICER, only 7 participants experienced change in conclusions from the draft to final report. Comments that influenced model results included specific recommendations on alternative approaches. Although ICER has expanded and clarified its process for collaborating with stakeholders, stakeholder comments had little influence on assessment outcomes. It is critical for stakeholders to provide explicit recommendations in order to leverage the evaluations as opportunities to promote active dialogue." @default.
- W2955065478 created "2019-07-12" @default.
- W2955065478 creator A5006719476 @default.
- W2955065478 creator A5024166344 @default.
- W2955065478 creator A5024306802 @default.
- W2955065478 creator A5061416618 @default.
- W2955065478 date "2019-05-01" @default.
- W2955065478 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2955065478 title "PMU80 A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF ICER EVALUATIONS FROM 2008 TO 2018: RECENT TRENDS IN EVALUATION PROCESS AND LESSONS LEARNED" @default.
- W2955065478 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2019.04.1241" @default.
- W2955065478 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
- W2955065478 type Work @default.
- W2955065478 sameAs 2955065478 @default.
- W2955065478 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2955065478 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2955065478 hasAuthorship W2955065478A5006719476 @default.
- W2955065478 hasAuthorship W2955065478A5024166344 @default.
- W2955065478 hasAuthorship W2955065478A5024306802 @default.
- W2955065478 hasAuthorship W2955065478A5061416618 @default.
- W2955065478 hasBestOaLocation W29550654781 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConcept C153083717 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConcept C184356942 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConcept C201305675 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConcept C2776125615 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConcept C2777601897 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConcept C2780984029 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConceptScore W2955065478C119857082 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConceptScore W2955065478C141071460 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConceptScore W2955065478C142724271 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConceptScore W2955065478C153083717 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConceptScore W2955065478C17744445 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConceptScore W2955065478C184356942 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConceptScore W2955065478C189708586 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConceptScore W2955065478C199539241 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConceptScore W2955065478C201305675 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConceptScore W2955065478C2776125615 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConceptScore W2955065478C2777601897 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConceptScore W2955065478C2779473830 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConceptScore W2955065478C2780984029 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConceptScore W2955065478C39549134 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConceptScore W2955065478C41008148 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConceptScore W2955065478C509550671 @default.
- W2955065478 hasConceptScore W2955065478C71924100 @default.
- W2955065478 hasLocation W29550654781 @default.
- W2955065478 hasOpenAccess W2955065478 @default.
- W2955065478 hasPrimaryLocation W29550654781 @default.
- W2955065478 hasRelatedWork W1888218106 @default.
- W2955065478 hasRelatedWork W1965397465 @default.
- W2955065478 hasRelatedWork W2002416883 @default.
- W2955065478 hasRelatedWork W2891192985 @default.
- W2955065478 hasRelatedWork W2918155500 @default.
- W2955065478 hasRelatedWork W3179566775 @default.
- W2955065478 hasRelatedWork W4200147441 @default.
- W2955065478 hasRelatedWork W4256556744 @default.
- W2955065478 hasRelatedWork W2186635845 @default.
- W2955065478 hasRelatedWork W632960207 @default.
- W2955065478 hasVolume "22" @default.
- W2955065478 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2955065478 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2955065478 magId "2955065478" @default.
- W2955065478 workType "article" @default.