FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2959297978> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2959297978 endingPage "1241" @default.
• W2959297978 startingPage "1223" @default.
• W2959297978 abstract "Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify potential competitive relationships among brands by analyzing the dynamic clicking behavior of consumers. Design/methodology/approach Consumer sequential online click data, collected from JD.com, is used to analyze the dynamic competitive relationship between brands. It is found that the competition intensity across categories of products can differ considerably. Consumers exhibit big differences in purchasing time of durable-like goods, that is, the purchasing probability of such products changes considerably over time. The local polynomial regression model (LPRM) is used to analyze the relationship between brand competition of durable-like goods and the purchasing probability of a particular brand. Findings The statistical results of collective behaviors show that there is a 90/10 rule for the category durable-like goods, implying that ten percent of the brands account for 90 percent market share in terms of both clicking and purchasing behavior. The dynamic brand cognitive process of impulsive consumers displays an inverted V shape, while cautious consumers display a double V shaped cognitive process. The dynamic consumers’ cognition illustrates that when the brands capture a half of the click volume, the brands’ competitiveness reaches to its peak and makes no significant different from brands accounting for 100 percent of the click volume in terms of the purchasing probability. Research limitations/implications There are some limitations to the research, including the limitations imposed by the data set. One of the most serious problems in the data set is that the collected click-stream is desensitized severely, restricting the richness of the conclusions of this study. Second, the data set consists of many other consumer behavioral data, but only the consumer’s clicking behavior is analyzed in this study. Therefore, in future research, the parameters brand browsing by consumers and the time of browsing in each brand should be added as indicators of brand competitive intensity. Practical implications The authors study brand competitiveness by analyzing the relationship between the click rate and the purchase likelihood of individual brands for durable-like products. When the brand competitiveness is less than 50 percent, consumers tend to seek a variety of new brands, and their purchase likelihood is positively correlated with the brand competitiveness. Once consumers learn about a particular brand excessively among all other brands at a period of time, the purchase likelihood of its products decreases due to the thinner consumer’s short-term loyalty the brand. Till the brand competitiveness runs up to 100 percent, consumers are most likely to purchase a brand and its product. That indicates brand competitiveness maintain 50 percent of the whole market is most efficient to be profitable, and the performance of costing more to improve the brand competitiveness might make no difference. Originality/value There are many studies on brand competition, but most of these research works analyze the brand’s marketing strategy from the perspective of the company. The limitation of this research is that the data are historical and failure to reflect time-variant competition. Some researchers have studied brand competition through consumer behavior, but the shortcoming of these studies is that it does not consider sequentiality of consumer behavior as this study does. Therefore, this study contributes to the literature by using consumers’ sequential clicking behavior and expands the perspective of brand competition research from the angle of consumers. Simultaneously, this paper uses the LPRM to analyze the relationship between consumer clicking behavior and brand competition for the first time, and expands the methodology accordingly." @default.
• W2959297978 created "2019-07-23" @default.
• W2959297978 creator A5021292791 @default.
• W2959297978 creator A5058394999 @default.
• W2959297978 creator A5070194187 @default.
• W2959297978 creator A5079906801 @default.
• W2959297978 date "2019-07-08" @default.
• W2959297978 modified "2023-10-06" @default.
• W2959297978 title "Dynamic property of consumer-based brand competitiveness (CBBC) in human interaction behavior" @default.
• W2959297978 cites W1548705611 @default.
• W2959297978 cites W1558031762 @default.
• W2959297978 cites W1930940922 @default.
• W2959297978 cites W1972978214 @default.
• W2959297978 cites W1973290440 @default.
• W2959297978 cites W1974437039 @default.
• W2959297978 cites W1993732525 @default.
• W2959297978 cites W2006540795 @default.
• W2959297978 cites W2034420649 @default.
• W2959297978 cites W2044607361 @default.
• W2959297978 cites W2049056723 @default.
• W2959297978 cites W2057032881 @default.
• W2959297978 cites W2059507684 @default.
• W2959297978 cites W2092766037 @default.
• W2959297978 cites W2093744423 @default.
• W2959297978 cites W2111379090 @default.
• W2959297978 cites W2115951962 @default.
• W2959297978 cites W2118844914 @default.
• W2959297978 cites W2146899871 @default.
• W2959297978 cites W2154555821 @default.
• W2959297978 cites W2325904848 @default.
• W2959297978 cites W2341359542 @default.
• W2959297978 cites W2574889026 @default.
• W2959297978 cites W2579074552 @default.
• W2959297978 cites W2592765230 @default.
• W2959297978 cites W2797485133 @default.
• W2959297978 cites W3122879329 @default.
• W2959297978 cites W3125952450 @default.
• W2959297978 cites W4231570018 @default.
• W2959297978 cites W4231580914 @default.
• W2959297978 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-09-2018-0403" @default.
• W2959297978 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2959297978 type Work @default.
• W2959297978 sameAs 2959297978 @default.
• W2959297978 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2959297978 countsByYear W29592979782019 @default.
• W2959297978 countsByYear W29592979782020 @default.
• W2959297978 countsByYear W29592979782021 @default.
• W2959297978 countsByYear W29592979782022 @default.
• W2959297978 countsByYear W29592979782023 @default.
• W2959297978 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2959297978 hasAuthorship W2959297978A5021292791 @default.
• W2959297978 hasAuthorship W2959297978A5058394999 @default.
• W2959297978 hasAuthorship W2959297978A5070194187 @default.
• W2959297978 hasAuthorship W2959297978A5079906801 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConcept C112698675 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConcept C177264268 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConcept C23213687 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConcept C2778813691 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConcept C61933577 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConcept C91306197 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConceptScore W2959297978C111919701 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConceptScore W2959297978C112698675 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConceptScore W2959297978C144133560 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConceptScore W2959297978C162324750 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConceptScore W2959297978C162853370 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConceptScore W2959297978C175444787 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConceptScore W2959297978C177264268 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConceptScore W2959297978C18903297 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConceptScore W2959297978C199360897 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConceptScore W2959297978C23213687 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConceptScore W2959297978C2778813691 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConceptScore W2959297978C41008148 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConceptScore W2959297978C61933577 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConceptScore W2959297978C86803240 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConceptScore W2959297978C91306197 @default.
• W2959297978 hasConceptScore W2959297978C98045186 @default.
• W2959297978 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2959297978 hasLocation W29592979781 @default.
• W2959297978 hasOpenAccess W2959297978 @default.
• W2959297978 hasPrimaryLocation W29592979781 @default.
• W2959297978 hasRelatedWork W183249021 @default.
• W2959297978 hasRelatedWork W1976490850 @default.
• W2959297978 hasRelatedWork W1979564835 @default.
• W2959297978 hasRelatedWork W2000050347 @default.
• W2959297978 hasRelatedWork W2040407859 @default.
• W2959297978 hasRelatedWork W2153232395 @default.
• W2959297978 hasRelatedWork W2167994724 @default.
• W2959297978 hasRelatedWork W2279478625 @default.

• next