FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2960419265> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2960419265 abstract "The Cobb angle is proposed as the disease process outcome for scoliosis research because therapies aim to correct or stop curve progression. While the Scoliosis Research Society recommends the Cobb angle as the primary outcome, the Society on Scoliosis Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Treatment prioritises, as a general goal, patient related outcomes over Cobb angle progression.To determine the threshold of change in the Cobb angle in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who perceive improvement in a 6-months randomized controlled trial comparing a Schroth exercise intervention added to the standard of care to the standard of care alone.This is a secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial of 50 patients with AIS, with curves ranging from 10° to 45°, with or without a brace. Participants with diagnoses other than AIS, surgical candidates or patients who had scoliosis surgery were excluded. The 6-month interventions consisted of Schroth exercises added to standard-of-care (observation or bracing) with daily home exercises and weekly therapy sessions (Schroth) or standard-of-care alone (Control). The anchor method for estimating the minimal important difference (MID) in the largest Cobb angles (LC) was used. Patient-reported change in back status over the 6-month treatment period was measured using the Global Rating of Change (GRC) scale as anchor varying from - 7 (great deal worse) to + 7 (great deal better). Participants were divided into two groups based on GRC scores: Improved (GRC ≥2) or Stable/Not Improved (GRC ≤1). MID was defined as the change in the LC that most accurately predicted the GRC classification as per the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC).The average age was 13.4 ± 1.6 years and the average LC was 28.5 ± 8.8 °s. The average GRC in the control group was - 0.1 ± 1.6, compared to + 4.4 ± 2.2 in the Schroth group. The correlation between LC and GRC was adequate (r = - 0.34, p < 0.05). The MID for the LC was 1.0 °. The area under the ROC was 0.69 (0.52-0.86), suggesting a 70% chance to properly classify a patient as perceiving No Improvement/Stable or Improvement based on the change in the LC.Patients undergoing Schroth treatment perceived improved status of their backs even if the Cobb angle did not improve beyond the conventionally accepted threshold of 5°. Standard of care aims to slow/stop progression while Schroth exercises aim to improve postural balance, signs and symptoms of scoliosis. Given the very small MID, perceived improvement in back status is likely due to something other than the Cobb angle. This study warrants investigating alternatives to the Cobb angle that might be more relevant to patients.ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01610908 . Retrospectively registered on April 2, 2012 (first posted on June 4, 2012 - https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/keydates/NCT01610908 )." @default.
• W2960419265 created "2019-07-23" @default.
• W2960419265 creator A5020721464 @default.
• W2960419265 creator A5023494791 @default.
• W2960419265 creator A5040736286 @default.
• W2960419265 creator A5051037234 @default.
• W2960419265 creator A5051556654 @default.
• W2960419265 creator A5063429960 @default.
• W2960419265 date "2019-07-08" @default.
• W2960419265 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2960419265 title "Patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis perceive positive improvements regardless of change in the Cobb angle – Results from a randomized controlled trial comparing a 6-month Schroth intervention added to standard care and standard care alone. SOSORT 2018 Award winner" @default.
• W2960419265 cites W1010285967 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W152404302 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W1558708612 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W1566841485 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W1583848026 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W1912205003 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W1965522233 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W1967499900 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W1967824063 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W1969265440 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W1972410466 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W1981073183 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W1983308625 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W1996278205 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W1998257339 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W2007322678 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W2013731340 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W2040512705 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W2060615382 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W2063032053 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W2063082183 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W2066148089 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W2085042072 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W2086791094 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W2088061142 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W2089524549 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W2099716808 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W2106667555 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W2109080838 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W2113384266 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W2118855899 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W2125405653 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W2136288303 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W2148584290 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W2151303120 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W2152750261 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W2157811514 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W2164510526 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W2168675538 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W2563455450 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W2754452072 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W2805612648 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W2917635635 @default.
• W2960419265 cites W4241287160 @default.
• W2960419265 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2695-9" @default.
• W2960419265 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6615154" @default.
• W2960419265 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31286903" @default.
• W2960419265 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2960419265 type Work @default.
• W2960419265 sameAs 2960419265 @default.
• W2960419265 citedByCount "31" @default.
• W2960419265 countsByYear W29604192652020 @default.
• W2960419265 countsByYear W29604192652021 @default.
• W2960419265 countsByYear W29604192652022 @default.
• W2960419265 countsByYear W29604192652023 @default.
• W2960419265 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2960419265 hasAuthorship W2960419265A5020721464 @default.
• W2960419265 hasAuthorship W2960419265A5023494791 @default.
• W2960419265 hasAuthorship W2960419265A5040736286 @default.
• W2960419265 hasAuthorship W2960419265A5051037234 @default.
• W2960419265 hasAuthorship W2960419265A5051556654 @default.
• W2960419265 hasAuthorship W2960419265A5063429960 @default.
• W2960419265 hasBestOaLocation W29604192651 @default.
• W2960419265 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2960419265 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2960419265 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2960419265 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2960419265 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2960419265 hasConcept C2775946787 @default.
• W2960419265 hasConcept C2778818304 @default.
• W2960419265 hasConcept C2778871979 @default.
• W2960419265 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
• W2960419265 hasConcept C2780955175 @default.
• W2960419265 hasConcept C2993634128 @default.
• W2960419265 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2960419265 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2960419265 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2960419265 hasConceptScore W2960419265C141071460 @default.
• W2960419265 hasConceptScore W2960419265C159110408 @default.
• W2960419265 hasConceptScore W2960419265C168563851 @default.
• W2960419265 hasConceptScore W2960419265C1862650 @default.
• W2960419265 hasConceptScore W2960419265C27415008 @default.
• W2960419265 hasConceptScore W2960419265C2775946787 @default.
• W2960419265 hasConceptScore W2960419265C2778818304 @default.
• W2960419265 hasConceptScore W2960419265C2778871979 @default.
• W2960419265 hasConceptScore W2960419265C2780665704 @default.
• W2960419265 hasConceptScore W2960419265C2780955175 @default.
• W2960419265 hasConceptScore W2960419265C2993634128 @default.
• W2960419265 hasConceptScore W2960419265C54355233 @default.

• next