FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W29607451> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W29607451 endingPage "66, 70" @default.
• W29607451 startingPage "57" @default.
• W29607451 abstract "This paper has identified problems with the guidelines and the disadvantages of the ASHA protocol. Some of these are significant. Others are less important but represent issues that should be considered when designing an EID protocol. The problems and disadvantages are summarized below. 1. The guidelines should have estimated and cost and performance of the recommended protocol. 2. The guidelines should have identified the true advantage of ABR screening (lower cost) and the disadvantage (lower hit rate) as compared to other protocols. 3. The guidelines should have evaluated other possible protocols. 4. The guidelines recommended the same protocol for all facilities (with adequate resources) independent of local factors. 5. The guidelines recommended the same screening strategy for the ICN and the WBN when different protocols may be appropriate. 6. The guidelines reject ABR screening of all WBN infants as too expensive without estimates of cost. More importantly, this is a decision that should be made by local institutions or governments. 7. The screening protocol was developed without a detailed description of the diagnostic component of the EID protocol. 8. The guidelines should have provided more information to hospitals that do not have the resources necessary to implement the recommended protocol. 9. The recommended protocol requires significant in-patient testing that can cause problems with reimbursement. 10. Some infants at risk for progressive loss can be lost from follow-up. Apparently, the guidelines were developed using a subjective, experiential approach. Although clinical experience is important, subjective impressions can be subject to bias and error. Some type of quantitative analysis is essential when developing test protocols. Perhaps a more rigorous theoretical foundation is needed to focus research and guide the development of EID protocols. The ASHA protocol is reasonable, but there is little evidence indicating that it is superior to, or even as good as, other possible protocols. Like all protocols, it has advantages and disadvantages. That is not to say that all possible protocols are appropriate. For example, protocols that delay diagnostic testing beyond 6 months should be rejected if the goal is habilitation by 6 months. Protocols that use screening tests with extremely poor hit rates may be undesirable in most situations. There remains one fundamental question. Is it even appropriate to recommend a particular protocol when, by necessity, many important local factors must be ignored? Perhaps it would be better to provide the basic data and techniques that would permit audiologists to design EID protocols that are optimum for their own circumstances." @default.
• W29607451 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W29607451 creator A5038293227 @default.
• W29607451 date "1990-09-01" @default.
• W29607451 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W29607451 title "Recommended guidelines for infant hearing screening: analysis." @default.
• W29607451 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2222566" @default.
• W29607451 hasPublicationYear "1990" @default.
• W29607451 type Work @default.
• W29607451 sameAs 29607451 @default.
• W29607451 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W29607451 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W29607451 hasAuthorship W29607451A5038293227 @default.
• W29607451 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W29607451 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W29607451 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W29607451 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W29607451 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W29607451 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W29607451 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W29607451 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W29607451 hasConcept C2777673361 @default.
• W29607451 hasConcept C2779703844 @default.
• W29607451 hasConcept C2780385302 @default.
• W29607451 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W29607451 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W29607451 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W29607451 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W29607451 hasConceptScore W29607451C112930515 @default.
• W29607451 hasConceptScore W29607451C142724271 @default.
• W29607451 hasConceptScore W29607451C154945302 @default.
• W29607451 hasConceptScore W29607451C160735492 @default.
• W29607451 hasConceptScore W29607451C162324750 @default.
• W29607451 hasConceptScore W29607451C177713679 @default.
• W29607451 hasConceptScore W29607451C19527891 @default.
• W29607451 hasConceptScore W29607451C204787440 @default.
• W29607451 hasConceptScore W29607451C2777673361 @default.
• W29607451 hasConceptScore W29607451C2779703844 @default.
• W29607451 hasConceptScore W29607451C2780385302 @default.
• W29607451 hasConceptScore W29607451C41008148 @default.
• W29607451 hasConceptScore W29607451C50522688 @default.
• W29607451 hasConceptScore W29607451C545542383 @default.
• W29607451 hasConceptScore W29607451C71924100 @default.
• W29607451 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W29607451 hasLocation W296074511 @default.
• W29607451 hasOpenAccess W29607451 @default.
• W29607451 hasPrimaryLocation W296074511 @default.
• W29607451 hasRelatedWork W166557622 @default.
• W29607451 hasRelatedWork W1977284027 @default.
• W29607451 hasRelatedWork W2367379106 @default.
• W29607451 hasRelatedWork W2391584204 @default.
• W29607451 hasRelatedWork W29607451 @default.
• W29607451 hasRelatedWork W3216440043 @default.
• W29607451 hasRelatedWork W4214536090 @default.
• W29607451 hasRelatedWork W4225006714 @default.
• W29607451 hasRelatedWork W4241855237 @default.
• W29607451 hasRelatedWork W78785078 @default.
• W29607451 hasVolume "32" @default.
• W29607451 isParatext "false" @default.
• W29607451 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W29607451 magId "29607451" @default.
• W29607451 workType "article" @default.