FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2961693696> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2961693696 endingPage "607" @default.
• W2961693696 startingPage "599" @default.
• W2961693696 abstract "Abstract Purpose The study purpose was to compare dissemination of PhD dissertation research by dissertation format: traditional (five‐chapter document providing a complete and systematic account of the PhD research) versus an alternate (substudy [document containing three smaller studies but not written as stand‐alone manuscripts] or publication [document containing three or more related manuscripts intended for submission or published in a peer‐reviewed journal]) format. Design A retrospective study of all PhD dissertations (1999–2019) from one research intensive school of nursing. Methods Following identification of graduates via the school's PhD database, we searched ProQuest and PubMed databases for the dissertation and first authored peer‐reviewed publications of each graduate to determine dissertation format, study design, timing and number of dissertation research publications, and inclusion of dissertation sponsor in authorship. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Findings Of 113 graduates, 80 (70.8%) employed a traditional format, with the remaining graduates structuring dissertations using an alternate (substudy [ n = 12], publication [ n = 21]) format. Of those using the traditional format, 33 graduates (41.3%) never published dissertation research findings in a peer‐reviewed journal. For those who published their dissertation research in a peer‐reviewed journal, time to first publication was 1.4 ± 2.1 years (median 1.6 years) following degree conferral. In contrast, all graduates who utilized alternate formats published one or more components of their dissertation research with shorter time to first published manuscript (‐0.6 ± 1.1 years; median ‐0.5 years; p < .001). Number of peer‐reviewed publications was higher for those who utilized an alternate format compared to the traditional format (2.9 ± 1.5 [median 3.0] vs. 1.8 ± 1.1 [median 1.0], p = .001). Acknowledgment of the sponsor's contribution via publication authorship was higher for those using an alternate format compared to the traditional format (100% vs. 70.2%). Conclusions Number and timeliness of peer‐reviewed publications stemming from dissertation research was higher for PhD graduates who utilized an alternate dissertation format. Alternate dissertation formats should be encouraged by PhD programs as one means to improve dissemination of PhD nursing research. Clinical Relevance Dissemination of PhD research through peer‐reviewed publications promotes the continued development of nursing science to inform nursing practice and advances the career trajectory of PhD graduates." @default.
• W2961693696 created "2019-07-23" @default.
• W2961693696 creator A5019761341 @default.
• W2961693696 creator A5027816013 @default.
• W2961693696 creator A5057258981 @default.
• W2961693696 creator A5064864823 @default.
• W2961693696 creator A5085111023 @default.
• W2961693696 date "2019-07-16" @default.
• W2961693696 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W2961693696 title "Dissemination of PhD Dissertation Research by Dissertation Format: A Retrospective Cohort Study" @default.
• W2961693696 cites W1497076353 @default.
• W2961693696 cites W1558322073 @default.
• W2961693696 cites W2020311100 @default.
• W2961693696 cites W2025246644 @default.
• W2961693696 cites W2037616192 @default.
• W2961693696 cites W2065241514 @default.
• W2961693696 cites W2076643988 @default.
• W2961693696 cites W2088746515 @default.
• W2961693696 cites W2092116424 @default.
• W2961693696 cites W2117129751 @default.
• W2961693696 cites W2159424093 @default.
• W2961693696 cites W2287388632 @default.
• W2961693696 cites W2557940159 @default.
• W2961693696 cites W2782308236 @default.
• W2961693696 cites W2790350047 @default.
• W2961693696 cites W2793434940 @default.
• W2961693696 cites W2972411545 @default.
• W2961693696 cites W782480893 @default.
• W2961693696 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12504" @default.
• W2961693696 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6742546" @default.
• W2961693696 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31313486" @default.
• W2961693696 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2961693696 type Work @default.
• W2961693696 sameAs 2961693696 @default.
• W2961693696 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2961693696 countsByYear W29616936962021 @default.
• W2961693696 countsByYear W29616936962022 @default.
• W2961693696 countsByYear W29616936962023 @default.
• W2961693696 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2961693696 hasAuthorship W2961693696A5019761341 @default.
• W2961693696 hasAuthorship W2961693696A5027816013 @default.
• W2961693696 hasAuthorship W2961693696A5057258981 @default.
• W2961693696 hasAuthorship W2961693696A5064864823 @default.
• W2961693696 hasAuthorship W2961693696A5085111023 @default.
• W2961693696 hasBestOaLocation W29616936962 @default.
• W2961693696 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2961693696 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W2961693696 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2961693696 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2961693696 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2961693696 hasConceptScore W2961693696C15744967 @default.
• W2961693696 hasConceptScore W2961693696C161191863 @default.
• W2961693696 hasConceptScore W2961693696C41008148 @default.
• W2961693696 hasConceptScore W2961693696C509550671 @default.
• W2961693696 hasConceptScore W2961693696C71924100 @default.
• W2961693696 hasFunder F4320337353 @default.
• W2961693696 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2961693696 hasLocation W29616936961 @default.
• W2961693696 hasLocation W29616936962 @default.
• W2961693696 hasLocation W29616936963 @default.
• W2961693696 hasOpenAccess W2961693696 @default.
• W2961693696 hasPrimaryLocation W29616936961 @default.
• W2961693696 hasRelatedWork W1506200166 @default.
• W2961693696 hasRelatedWork W1995515455 @default.
• W2961693696 hasRelatedWork W2048182022 @default.
• W2961693696 hasRelatedWork W2080531066 @default.
• W2961693696 hasRelatedWork W2604872355 @default.
• W2961693696 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2961693696 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2961693696 hasRelatedWork W3031052312 @default.
• W2961693696 hasRelatedWork W3032375762 @default.
• W2961693696 hasRelatedWork W3108674512 @default.
• W2961693696 hasVolume "51" @default.
• W2961693696 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2961693696 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2961693696 magId "2961693696" @default.
• W2961693696 workType "article" @default.