FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2962752496> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2962752496 abstract "For feedback to be effective, students must have opportunities to take action based on information provided. We explored students’ enactment of feedback and enhanced learning behaviours through a series of graded low-stake learning-oriented presentations. 70 final year International Business undergraduate students at a UK university were assessed by peers and staff on eight group presentations each contributing 2.5% to their final grade. This allowed for dialogic peer feedback, presentation skill improvement, knowledge exchange, critique and enactment of feedback in subsequent presentations (Carless, 2013b, Bearman et al, 2014, Nicol et al, 2014). Central to the dialogic nature of the peer feedback interactions was the meaning making and influence this had upon students’ future learning behaviours (Ajjawi & Boud, 2017; Yang & Carless, 2013). Students were surveyed about their experience at the beginning, mid-point and end of the module. Data were thematically analysed.At the beginning, students were positive about the challenge of working in groups, but concerned about the amount of work required and their peers work ethic. At the midpoint students reported, their knowledge had deepened. At the end of the module, students felt their presentation skills and confidence had improved. However, they felt the presentations required a lot of work for a small weighting. The students’ perceptions of peer feedback fluctuated. At the beginning, students were positive about the potential for using peer feedback for improvement in their next presentation. At the midpoint and end of the module, the vast majority said they had used peer feedback to address identified weaknesses in their next presentation. A minority suggested peer feedback was superficial and not useable. Most students reflected that the assessment had deepened their approach to learning and their use of feedback in similar assessments in other modules. A few students reported that the feedback was not transferable to other assessments.Overall, it appears that many students welcomed the incentive to work throughout the module on multiple, low-stakes presentations, enacted the peer feedback and perceived that their learning had improved. The students’ grade outcomes support these contentions. After presentation one the average grade was 62.6 % (±8.26), at the mid-point of the module the average grade was 70.1% (±8.69) and on the final presentation the average grade was 75.1% (±9.8). These results are an indication that despite the relatively low weighting, an integrated feedback and assessment regime helps students to enact feedback, increases their learning and improves performance." @default.
• W2962752496 created "2019-07-30" @default.
• W2962752496 creator A5051167859 @default.
• W2962752496 creator A5065115080 @default.
• W2962752496 date "2019-03-29" @default.
• W2962752496 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2962752496 title "Students’ Enactment of Feedback Through a Series of Graded Low-Stake Learning-Oriented Presentations." @default.
• W2962752496 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2962752496 type Work @default.
• W2962752496 sameAs 2962752496 @default.
• W2962752496 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2962752496 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2962752496 hasAuthorship W2962752496A5051167859 @default.
• W2962752496 hasAuthorship W2962752496A5065115080 @default.
• W2962752496 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2962752496 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W2962752496 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2962752496 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2962752496 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2962752496 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W2962752496 hasConcept C2777601897 @default.
• W2962752496 hasConcept C2778679518 @default.
• W2962752496 hasConcept C42058189 @default.
• W2962752496 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2962752496 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2962752496 hasConceptScore W2962752496C126838900 @default.
• W2962752496 hasConceptScore W2962752496C145420912 @default.
• W2962752496 hasConceptScore W2962752496C15744967 @default.
• W2962752496 hasConceptScore W2962752496C169760540 @default.
• W2962752496 hasConceptScore W2962752496C19417346 @default.
• W2962752496 hasConceptScore W2962752496C26760741 @default.
• W2962752496 hasConceptScore W2962752496C2777601897 @default.
• W2962752496 hasConceptScore W2962752496C2778679518 @default.
• W2962752496 hasConceptScore W2962752496C42058189 @default.
• W2962752496 hasConceptScore W2962752496C509550671 @default.
• W2962752496 hasConceptScore W2962752496C71924100 @default.
• W2962752496 hasLocation W29627524961 @default.
• W2962752496 hasOpenAccess W2962752496 @default.
• W2962752496 hasPrimaryLocation W29627524961 @default.
• W2962752496 hasRelatedWork W1144120835 @default.
• W2962752496 hasRelatedWork W128845807 @default.
• W2962752496 hasRelatedWork W1484915251 @default.
• W2962752496 hasRelatedWork W1731155988 @default.
• W2962752496 hasRelatedWork W2050822612 @default.
• W2962752496 hasRelatedWork W2068553215 @default.
• W2962752496 hasRelatedWork W2130329738 @default.
• W2962752496 hasRelatedWork W2256241106 @default.
• W2962752496 hasRelatedWork W2472225677 @default.
• W2962752496 hasRelatedWork W2478166553 @default.
• W2962752496 hasRelatedWork W2588779087 @default.
• W2962752496 hasRelatedWork W2600655228 @default.
• W2962752496 hasRelatedWork W2604320192 @default.
• W2962752496 hasRelatedWork W2954403805 @default.
• W2962752496 hasRelatedWork W2964151642 @default.
• W2962752496 hasRelatedWork W3195867298 @default.
• W2962752496 hasRelatedWork W4963309 @default.
• W2962752496 hasRelatedWork W2119870919 @default.
• W2962752496 hasRelatedWork W2183408970 @default.
• W2962752496 hasRelatedWork W2221998505 @default.
• W2962752496 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2962752496 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2962752496 magId "2962752496" @default.
• W2962752496 workType "article" @default.