Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2964241533> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 68 of
68
with 100 items per page.
- W2964241533 abstract "70 Rutg. L. Rev. 101 (2018).Since at least 1991, issues surrounding mandatory arbitration of employment and other disputes have intrigued, perplexed, angered, gratified, and confounded academics, politicians, lawyers, and others.As with many legal issues, the first wave of scholarly work centered on the law. As the law has pretty much settled, academics have turned to empirical work, focusing on how employment arbitration works, and how it compares to employment litigation. In part due to pressure from California legislation, the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”), the nation’s leading provider of arbitration services, opened access to its data base. Owing to inevitable data limitations, most analyses have focused on outcomes—comparisons between litigation verdicts/judgments and arbitration awards. This work suffers from a serious selection bias, for there is no reason to believe that cases that result in arbitration awards are otherwise comparable to cases that have survived the several serious gauntlets that lie in the path of a case before it goes to trial. Because mediation is often an initial step in most employment arbitration system and arbitrators are not likely to consider dispositive motions, weaker cases are likely to get to a hearing in arbitration than in court.We wholeheartedly endorse good empirical work as an important means of understanding and addressing controversial policy issues, especially in the arbitration arena, and tried our hand at such work a decade ago. We have written this paper to encourage research that goes beyond evaluating awards within the AAA data set and to engage in a longitudinal study of the history of claims—from when they are initially filed with administrative agencies or arbitration organizations to when they are settled or adjudicated." @default.
- W2964241533 created "2019-07-30" @default.
- W2964241533 creator A5000897584 @default.
- W2964241533 creator A5035287165 @default.
- W2964241533 creator A5037505611 @default.
- W2964241533 date "2019-08-01" @default.
- W2964241533 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2964241533 title "Evaluating Employment Arbitration: A Call for Better Empirical Research" @default.
- W2964241533 doi "https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/mgu62" @default.
- W2964241533 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
- W2964241533 type Work @default.
- W2964241533 sameAs 2964241533 @default.
- W2964241533 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2964241533 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
- W2964241533 hasAuthorship W2964241533A5000897584 @default.
- W2964241533 hasAuthorship W2964241533A5035287165 @default.
- W2964241533 hasAuthorship W2964241533A5037505611 @default.
- W2964241533 hasBestOaLocation W29642415332 @default.
- W2964241533 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W2964241533 hasConcept C120936955 @default.
- W2964241533 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W2964241533 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2964241533 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2964241533 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W2964241533 hasConcept C160151201 @default.
- W2964241533 hasConcept C160786031 @default.
- W2964241533 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2964241533 hasConcept C179420905 @default.
- W2964241533 hasConcept C18762648 @default.
- W2964241533 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W2964241533 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2964241533 hasConcept C2777351106 @default.
- W2964241533 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
- W2964241533 hasConceptScore W2964241533C111472728 @default.
- W2964241533 hasConceptScore W2964241533C120936955 @default.
- W2964241533 hasConceptScore W2964241533C127413603 @default.
- W2964241533 hasConceptScore W2964241533C138885662 @default.
- W2964241533 hasConceptScore W2964241533C144024400 @default.
- W2964241533 hasConceptScore W2964241533C144133560 @default.
- W2964241533 hasConceptScore W2964241533C160151201 @default.
- W2964241533 hasConceptScore W2964241533C160786031 @default.
- W2964241533 hasConceptScore W2964241533C17744445 @default.
- W2964241533 hasConceptScore W2964241533C179420905 @default.
- W2964241533 hasConceptScore W2964241533C18762648 @default.
- W2964241533 hasConceptScore W2964241533C190253527 @default.
- W2964241533 hasConceptScore W2964241533C199539241 @default.
- W2964241533 hasConceptScore W2964241533C2777351106 @default.
- W2964241533 hasConceptScore W2964241533C78519656 @default.
- W2964241533 hasLocation W29642415331 @default.
- W2964241533 hasLocation W29642415332 @default.
- W2964241533 hasLocation W29642415333 @default.
- W2964241533 hasLocation W29642415334 @default.
- W2964241533 hasOpenAccess W2964241533 @default.
- W2964241533 hasPrimaryLocation W29642415331 @default.
- W2964241533 hasRelatedWork W2075991290 @default.
- W2964241533 hasRelatedWork W2313135820 @default.
- W2964241533 hasRelatedWork W2352409316 @default.
- W2964241533 hasRelatedWork W2352731212 @default.
- W2964241533 hasRelatedWork W2360459208 @default.
- W2964241533 hasRelatedWork W2596765846 @default.
- W2964241533 hasRelatedWork W3023986085 @default.
- W2964241533 hasRelatedWork W3125496750 @default.
- W2964241533 hasRelatedWork W4366413436 @default.
- W2964241533 hasRelatedWork W2191501341 @default.
- W2964241533 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2964241533 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2964241533 magId "2964241533" @default.
- W2964241533 workType "article" @default.