FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2964563392> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2964563392 endingPage "1181" @default.
• W2964563392 startingPage "1172" @default.
• W2964563392 abstract "OBJECTIVE The cisternal pulvinar is a challenging location for neurosurgery. Four approaches for reaching the pulvinar without cortical transgression are the ipsilateral supracerebellar infratentorial (iSCIT), contralateral supracerebellar infratentorial (cSCIT), ipsilateral occipital transtentorial (iOCTT), and contralateral occipital transtentorial/falcine (cOCTF) approaches. This study quantitatively compared these approaches in terms of surgical exposure and maneuverability. METHODS Each of the 4 approaches was performed in 4 cadaveric heads (8 specimens in total). A 6-sided anatomical polygonal region was configured over the cisternal pulvinar, defined by 6 reachable anatomical points in different vectors. Multiple polygons were subsequently formed to calculate the areas of exposure. The surgical freedom of each approach was calculated as the maximum allowable working area at the proximal end of a probe, with the distal end fixed at the posterior pole of the pulvinar. Areas of exposure, surgical freedom, and the working distance (surgical depth) of all approaches were compared. RESULTS No significant difference was found among the 4 different approaches with regard to the surgical depth, surgical freedom, or medial exposure area of the pulvinar. In the pairwise comparison, the cSCIT approach provided a significantly larger lateral exposure (39 ± 9.8 mm 2 ) than iSCIT (19 ± 10.3 mm 2 , p < 0.01), iOCTT (19 ± 8.2 mm 2 , p < 0.01), and cOCTF (28 ± 7.3 mm 2 , p = 0.02) approaches. The total exposure area with a cSCIT approach (75 ± 23.1 mm 2 ) was significantly larger than with iOCTT (43 ± 16.4 mm 2 , p < 0.01) and iSCIT (40 ± 20.2 mm 2 , p = 0.01) approaches (pairwise, p ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSIONS The cSCIT approach is preferable among the 4 compared approaches, demonstrating better exposure to the cisternal pulvinar than ipsilateral approaches and a larger lateral exposure than the cOCTF approach. Both contralateral approaches described (cSCIT and cOCTF) provided enhanced lateral exposure to the pulvinar, while the cOCTF provided a larger exposure to the lateral portion of the pulvinar than the iOCTT. Medial exposure and maneuverability did not differ among the approaches. A short tentorium may negatively impact an ipsilateral approach because the cingulate isthmus and parahippocampal gyrus tend to protrude, in which case they can obstruct access to the cisternal pulvinar ipsilaterally." @default.
• W2964563392 created "2019-08-13" @default.
• W2964563392 creator A5008718222 @default.
• W2964563392 creator A5013211825 @default.
• W2964563392 creator A5029728124 @default.
• W2964563392 creator A5038453962 @default.
• W2964563392 creator A5040939351 @default.
• W2964563392 creator A5042163238 @default.
• W2964563392 creator A5057346821 @default.
• W2964563392 creator A5061207091 @default.
• W2964563392 creator A5068023339 @default.
• W2964563392 creator A5070170797 @default.
• W2964563392 creator A5078234471 @default.
• W2964563392 date "2020-10-01" @default.
• W2964563392 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2964563392 title "Quantitative analysis of ipsilateral and contralateral supracerebellar infratentorial and occipital transtentorial approaches to the cisternal pulvinar: laboratory anatomical investigation" @default.
• W2964563392 cites W1983057993 @default.
• W2964563392 cites W2047211395 @default.
• W2964563392 cites W2057380641 @default.
• W2964563392 cites W2091206976 @default.
• W2964563392 cites W2095829038 @default.
• W2964563392 cites W2106741194 @default.
• W2964563392 cites W2149579340 @default.
• W2964563392 cites W2153374846 @default.
• W2964563392 cites W2525471871 @default.
• W2964563392 cites W2560545501 @default.
• W2964563392 cites W2593415292 @default.
• W2964563392 cites W2791050999 @default.
• W2964563392 cites W2810746817 @default.
• W2964563392 cites W2883867228 @default.
• W2964563392 cites W4233768749 @default.
• W2964563392 cites W980832146 @default.
• W2964563392 doi "https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.4.jns19351" @default.
• W2964563392 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32796149" @default.
• W2964563392 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W2964563392 type Work @default.
• W2964563392 sameAs 2964563392 @default.
• W2964563392 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2964563392 countsByYear W29645633922020 @default.
• W2964563392 countsByYear W29645633922021 @default.
• W2964563392 countsByYear W29645633922022 @default.
• W2964563392 countsByYear W29645633922023 @default.
• W2964563392 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2964563392 hasAuthorship W2964563392A5008718222 @default.
• W2964563392 hasAuthorship W2964563392A5013211825 @default.
• W2964563392 hasAuthorship W2964563392A5029728124 @default.
• W2964563392 hasAuthorship W2964563392A5038453962 @default.
• W2964563392 hasAuthorship W2964563392A5040939351 @default.
• W2964563392 hasAuthorship W2964563392A5042163238 @default.
• W2964563392 hasAuthorship W2964563392A5057346821 @default.
• W2964563392 hasAuthorship W2964563392A5061207091 @default.
• W2964563392 hasAuthorship W2964563392A5068023339 @default.
• W2964563392 hasAuthorship W2964563392A5070170797 @default.
• W2964563392 hasAuthorship W2964563392A5078234471 @default.
• W2964563392 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W2964563392 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2964563392 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2964563392 hasConcept C12770488 @default.
• W2964563392 hasConcept C16568411 @default.
• W2964563392 hasConcept C175696284 @default.
• W2964563392 hasConcept C2779889316 @default.
• W2964563392 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2964563392 hasConcept C91762617 @default.
• W2964563392 hasConceptScore W2964563392C105702510 @default.
• W2964563392 hasConceptScore W2964563392C118552586 @default.
• W2964563392 hasConceptScore W2964563392C126838900 @default.
• W2964563392 hasConceptScore W2964563392C12770488 @default.
• W2964563392 hasConceptScore W2964563392C16568411 @default.
• W2964563392 hasConceptScore W2964563392C175696284 @default.
• W2964563392 hasConceptScore W2964563392C2779889316 @default.
• W2964563392 hasConceptScore W2964563392C71924100 @default.
• W2964563392 hasConceptScore W2964563392C91762617 @default.
• W2964563392 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2964563392 hasLocation W29645633921 @default.
• W2964563392 hasLocation W29645633922 @default.
• W2964563392 hasOpenAccess W2964563392 @default.
• W2964563392 hasPrimaryLocation W29645633921 @default.
• W2964563392 hasRelatedWork W1749010593 @default.
• W2964563392 hasRelatedWork W1968410308 @default.
• W2964563392 hasRelatedWork W1992865468 @default.
• W2964563392 hasRelatedWork W1996260967 @default.
• W2964563392 hasRelatedWork W2051096614 @default.
• W2964563392 hasRelatedWork W2089721111 @default.
• W2964563392 hasRelatedWork W2183865493 @default.
• W2964563392 hasRelatedWork W2564799247 @default.
• W2964563392 hasRelatedWork W2794110980 @default.
• W2964563392 hasRelatedWork W3098680960 @default.
• W2964563392 hasVolume "133" @default.
• W2964563392 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2964563392 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2964563392 magId "2964563392" @default.
• W2964563392 workType "article" @default.