FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2964564423> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2964564423 endingPage "253" @default.
• W2964564423 startingPage "248" @default.
• W2964564423 abstract "ImportanceThe concept of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) has come to the forefront in the evaluation of the results of treatment for musculoskeletal ailments, reflecting the concerns of improving patient-centred care. However, athletes and physically active individuals have physical and psychological expectations and goals that differ from those of the general population.ObjectiveThis systematic review aimed to investigate, with no restriction to the type of musculoskeletal sports injury, whether there is a standardisation of how to perform PROMs for athletes and physically active individuals.Evidence reviewA systematic review of the literature was performed searching the following electronic databases—The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature; Cochrane Library; Embase; Medline-Ovid; Portal Regional da BVS/BIREME; ProQuest Health and Medical Collection; PubMed; SPORTDiscus, Web of Science with no limitations for year of publication up to December 2018. The search terms used were: patient outcomes measures, patient outcomes assessment, sports medicine. The articles were considered eligible according to the following criteria: studies related to populations of regular professional or recreational sports practitioners of any age, surgically managed sports injury, articles reporting PROMS evaluation in at least 50 athletes, postoperative evaluation and articles published in English, French, Portuguese, Spanish and Italian. We excluded systematic reviews, meta-analyses, editorials, articles reporting the results of non-surgical treatment, articles where no PROMS evaluation was performed, abstracts and case reports.FindingsPROMs in athletes and high-performance sports practitioners were not uniform even when the same surgical procedure, such as anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, was performed. Moreover, this study found 24 different PROMs reported in the 16 selected articles, confirming that, in Sports Medicine, there is a void in PROMs tailored to evaluate the postoperative outcomes regarding the physical and psychological demands of athletes and sports practitioners.Conclusion and relevanceThis systematic review evidences that the 16 selected articles did not present a standardisation in how to evaluate the postoperative outcomes in athletes and high-performance sports practitioners. Moreover, the preinjury status of physical demand reported should be of prime importance in developing PROMs tailored to this group athletes and regular sports practitioner.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019120701.Level of evidenceLevel IV, systematic review of levels I–IV studies. The concept of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) has come to the forefront in the evaluation of the results of treatment for musculoskeletal ailments, reflecting the concerns of improving patient-centred care. However, athletes and physically active individuals have physical and psychological expectations and goals that differ from those of the general population. This systematic review aimed to investigate, with no restriction to the type of musculoskeletal sports injury, whether there is a standardisation of how to perform PROMs for athletes and physically active individuals. A systematic review of the literature was performed searching the following electronic databases—The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature; Cochrane Library; Embase; Medline-Ovid; Portal Regional da BVS/BIREME; ProQuest Health and Medical Collection; PubMed; SPORTDiscus, Web of Science with no limitations for year of publication up to December 2018. The search terms used were: patient outcomes measures, patient outcomes assessment, sports medicine. The articles were considered eligible according to the following criteria: studies related to populations of regular professional or recreational sports practitioners of any age, surgically managed sports injury, articles reporting PROMS evaluation in at least 50 athletes, postoperative evaluation and articles published in English, French, Portuguese, Spanish and Italian. We excluded systematic reviews, meta-analyses, editorials, articles reporting the results of non-surgical treatment, articles where no PROMS evaluation was performed, abstracts and case reports. PROMs in athletes and high-performance sports practitioners were not uniform even when the same surgical procedure, such as anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, was performed. Moreover, this study found 24 different PROMs reported in the 16 selected articles, confirming that, in Sports Medicine, there is a void in PROMs tailored to evaluate the postoperative outcomes regarding the physical and psychological demands of athletes and sports practitioners. This systematic review evidences that the 16 selected articles did not present a standardisation in how to evaluate the postoperative outcomes in athletes and high-performance sports practitioners. Moreover, the preinjury status of physical demand reported should be of prime importance in developing PROMs tailored to this group athletes and regular sports practitioner." @default.
• W2964564423 created "2019-08-13" @default.
• W2964564423 creator A5000665020 @default.
• W2964564423 creator A5024159880 @default.
• W2964564423 creator A5079963602 @default.
• W2964564423 date "2019-09-01" @default.
• W2964564423 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2964564423 title "Presently PROMs are not tailored for athletes and high-performance sports practitioners: a systematic review" @default.
• W2964564423 cites W1948655008 @default.
• W2964564423 cites W1955307745 @default.
• W2964564423 cites W1974884549 @default.
• W2964564423 cites W1975272970 @default.
• W2964564423 cites W1993190399 @default.
• W2964564423 cites W2005948255 @default.
• W2964564423 cites W2011623869 @default.
• W2964564423 cites W2021691581 @default.
• W2964564423 cites W2031295781 @default.
• W2964564423 cites W2037681171 @default.
• W2964564423 cites W2049487316 @default.
• W2964564423 cites W2049544709 @default.
• W2964564423 cites W2111189813 @default.
• W2964564423 cites W2134833483 @default.
• W2964564423 cites W2137448521 @default.
• W2964564423 cites W2151299853 @default.
• W2964564423 cites W2162321417 @default.
• W2964564423 cites W2216322109 @default.
• W2964564423 cites W2261411602 @default.
• W2964564423 cites W2272715967 @default.
• W2964564423 cites W2308530128 @default.
• W2964564423 cites W2325925575 @default.
• W2964564423 cites W2337710736 @default.
• W2964564423 cites W2403566809 @default.
• W2964564423 cites W2410078163 @default.
• W2964564423 cites W2593212783 @default.
• W2964564423 cites W2602654393 @default.
• W2964564423 cites W2611558877 @default.
• W2964564423 cites W2626173242 @default.
• W2964564423 cites W2738547372 @default.
• W2964564423 cites W2936094279 @default.
• W2964564423 cites W3141544461 @default.
• W2964564423 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/jisakos-2019-000286" @default.
• W2964564423 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2964564423 type Work @default.
• W2964564423 sameAs 2964564423 @default.
• W2964564423 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2964564423 countsByYear W29645644232021 @default.
• W2964564423 countsByYear W29645644232022 @default.
• W2964564423 countsByYear W29645644232023 @default.
• W2964564423 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2964564423 hasAuthorship W2964564423A5000665020 @default.
• W2964564423 hasAuthorship W2964564423A5024159880 @default.
• W2964564423 hasAuthorship W2964564423A5079963602 @default.
• W2964564423 hasBestOaLocation W29645644231 @default.
• W2964564423 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2964564423 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2964564423 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2964564423 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W2964564423 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2964564423 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2964564423 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W2964564423 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2964564423 hasConcept C2781054738 @default.
• W2964564423 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2964564423 hasConcept C43893838 @default.
• W2964564423 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2964564423 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2964564423 hasConcept C83867959 @default.
• W2964564423 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2964564423 hasConceptScore W2964564423C142724271 @default.
• W2964564423 hasConceptScore W2964564423C17744445 @default.
• W2964564423 hasConceptScore W2964564423C1862650 @default.
• W2964564423 hasConceptScore W2964564423C189708586 @default.
• W2964564423 hasConceptScore W2964564423C199539241 @default.
• W2964564423 hasConceptScore W2964564423C204787440 @default.
• W2964564423 hasConceptScore W2964564423C2776478404 @default.
• W2964564423 hasConceptScore W2964564423C2779473830 @default.
• W2964564423 hasConceptScore W2964564423C2781054738 @default.
• W2964564423 hasConceptScore W2964564423C2908647359 @default.
• W2964564423 hasConceptScore W2964564423C43893838 @default.
• W2964564423 hasConceptScore W2964564423C512399662 @default.
• W2964564423 hasConceptScore W2964564423C71924100 @default.
• W2964564423 hasConceptScore W2964564423C83867959 @default.
• W2964564423 hasConceptScore W2964564423C99454951 @default.
• W2964564423 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2964564423 hasLocation W29645644231 @default.
• W2964564423 hasOpenAccess W2964564423 @default.
• W2964564423 hasPrimaryLocation W29645644231 @default.
• W2964564423 hasRelatedWork W1895224385 @default.
• W2964564423 hasRelatedWork W2001309417 @default.
• W2964564423 hasRelatedWork W2132791223 @default.
• W2964564423 hasRelatedWork W2341907313 @default.
• W2964564423 hasRelatedWork W2776638564 @default.
• W2964564423 hasRelatedWork W2896552665 @default.
• W2964564423 hasRelatedWork W4200501286 @default.
• W2964564423 hasRelatedWork W4280549562 @default.
• W2964564423 hasRelatedWork W4280583103 @default.
• W2964564423 hasRelatedWork W4292560152 @default.
• W2964564423 hasVolume "4" @default.

• next