FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2965321062> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2965321062 endingPage "1159" @default.
• W2965321062 startingPage "1154" @default.
• W2965321062 abstract "Dairy animals play an important role in the Indian economy. Knowledge of the occurrence pattern of long bone fractures in bovine may help in strategizing the possibilities of treatment and prognosis. This study aimed to find out the comparative occurrence pattern of fractures in cattle and buffaloes.A total of 278 fractures of bovine (171 in cattle and 107 in buffaloes), presented to the Department of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India, during a study of 1 year, were investigated for the occurrence pattern, in relation to species, age, body weight, gender, bone involved, type of fracture (closed or open), and the presentation of bovine as standing or in recumbent state.The overall hospital occurrence of fractures in bovine was 4.24% and most of the fractures resulted from slipping and falling on hard floor. Of 278 fractures, the majority (90.28%) involved long bones (n=251; 103 buffaloes and 148 cattle). Forelimb fractures were recorded more common in buffaloes (64.08%), whereas the cattle suffered more of hind limb fractures (60.23%). Cattle also included 11 cases of bilateral fractures of metacarpal (n=3), tibia (n=1), radius and ulna (n=1), and mandible (n=6). Fracture of olecranon constituted 6.83% (n=19) and majority (n=15) were in buffaloes. The cattle had higher percent of open fractures (54.38%) as compared to that in buffaloes (17.76%). Marginally higher percentage of cattle (33.33%) suffering from fracture were recumbent as compared to buffaloes (23.36%) and femur fractures were found to be a leading cause of recumbency (100% in cattle and 75.00% in buffaloes).Species-specific differences in the occurrence pattern of fractures exist among cattle and buffaloes. Cattle are found to be more susceptible (1.5 times) to fractures as compared to buffaloes. The buffaloes are vulnerable to forelimb fractures while the cattle to the hind limb. As compared to forelimb, long bone fractures of hind limb are more commonly associated with recumbency in bovine. Cattle are more prone to mandible fractures and the open fractures of long bones as compared to buffaloes." @default.
• W2965321062 created "2019-08-13" @default.
• W2965321062 creator A5009623431 @default.
• W2965321062 creator A5031958953 @default.
• W2965321062 creator A5088779509 @default.
• W2965321062 date "2019-07-01" @default.
• W2965321062 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2965321062 title "Comparative occurrence pattern of fractures in cattle and buffaloes" @default.
• W2965321062 cites W1854300969 @default.
• W2965321062 cites W1997299187 @default.
• W2965321062 cites W2010308221 @default.
• W2965321062 cites W2134227151 @default.
• W2965321062 cites W2153996243 @default.
• W2965321062 cites W2297394148 @default.
• W2965321062 cites W2762880668 @default.
• W2965321062 cites W2802695130 @default.
• W2965321062 doi "https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2019.1154-1159" @default.
• W2965321062 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6702580" @default.
• W2965321062 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31528047" @default.
• W2965321062 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2965321062 type Work @default.
• W2965321062 sameAs 2965321062 @default.
• W2965321062 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2965321062 countsByYear W29653210622020 @default.
• W2965321062 countsByYear W29653210622022 @default.
• W2965321062 countsByYear W29653210622023 @default.
• W2965321062 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2965321062 hasAuthorship W2965321062A5009623431 @default.
• W2965321062 hasAuthorship W2965321062A5031958953 @default.
• W2965321062 hasAuthorship W2965321062A5088779509 @default.
• W2965321062 hasBestOaLocation W29653210621 @default.
• W2965321062 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2965321062 hasConcept C2777236700 @default.
• W2965321062 hasConcept C2777695862 @default.
• W2965321062 hasConcept C2780711802 @default.
• W2965321062 hasConcept C2781184374 @default.
• W2965321062 hasConcept C42972112 @default.
• W2965321062 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2965321062 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2965321062 hasConceptScore W2965321062C141071460 @default.
• W2965321062 hasConceptScore W2965321062C2777236700 @default.
• W2965321062 hasConceptScore W2965321062C2777695862 @default.
• W2965321062 hasConceptScore W2965321062C2780711802 @default.
• W2965321062 hasConceptScore W2965321062C2781184374 @default.
• W2965321062 hasConceptScore W2965321062C42972112 @default.
• W2965321062 hasConceptScore W2965321062C71924100 @default.
• W2965321062 hasConceptScore W2965321062C86803240 @default.
• W2965321062 hasFunder F4320320769 @default.
• W2965321062 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W2965321062 hasLocation W29653210621 @default.
• W2965321062 hasLocation W29653210622 @default.
• W2965321062 hasLocation W29653210623 @default.
• W2965321062 hasLocation W29653210624 @default.
• W2965321062 hasOpenAccess W2965321062 @default.
• W2965321062 hasPrimaryLocation W29653210621 @default.
• W2965321062 hasRelatedWork W1972335318 @default.
• W2965321062 hasRelatedWork W1975728865 @default.
• W2965321062 hasRelatedWork W2018765122 @default.
• W2965321062 hasRelatedWork W2297593607 @default.
• W2965321062 hasRelatedWork W2380410518 @default.
• W2965321062 hasRelatedWork W2615930975 @default.
• W2965321062 hasRelatedWork W2965321062 @default.
• W2965321062 hasRelatedWork W3041237137 @default.
• W2965321062 hasRelatedWork W4322488810 @default.
• W2965321062 hasRelatedWork W2288546280 @default.
• W2965321062 hasVolume "12" @default.
• W2965321062 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2965321062 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2965321062 magId "2965321062" @default.
• W2965321062 workType "article" @default.