FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2967210014> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2967210014 endingPage "e16662" @default.
• W2967210014 startingPage "e16662" @default.
• W2967210014 abstract "Abstract Background: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is caused by neural compression due to narrowing of the lumbar spinal canal or neural foramen. Surgical intervention is a standard treatment for LSS; however, the steep increase in the surgical rate, post-operative complications, and comparatively low long-term satisfaction are considered to be limitations of this surgical approach. Conversely, acupotomy is a minimally invasive technique that combines the effects of conventional acupuncture with micro-incision, which may offer an alternative to surgery for the treatment of LSS. This review was conducted to investigate and critically review the current evidence on the efficacy and safety of acupotomy for LSS. Methods: Eleven databases were searched from their respective inception dates to December 28, 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing acupotomy and wait-list, sham treatment, or active controls were included. The quality of the included studies was assessed using risk-of-bias tool. Results: Seven RCTs were included in this review and meta-analysis. The methodological quality of the included studies was generally poor. The acupotomy treatment group was associated with significantly lower visual analogue scale scores (range 0∼10) (5 RCTs; mean difference [MD] −1.55, 95% confidence interval [CIs] −2.60 to −0.50; I 2 = 94%) and higher Japanese Orthopedic Association Score (3 RCTs; MD 4.70, 95% CI 3.73 to 5.68; I 2 = 0%) compared to the active control group. In subgroup analysis based on the type of active controls, acupotomy retained significant benefits over lumbar traction and acupuncture, as well as over lumbar traction, spinal decompression, and acupuncture. Safety data were reported in only 1 study, and no adverse events occurred in either the acupotomy or the acupuncture control group. Conclusion: According to current evidence, acupotomy might be beneficial for treating LSS. Acupotomy showed consistent superiority over lumbar traction, but the results were mixed in comparisons with other interventions, such as spinal decompression and acupuncture. However, the findings should be interpreted cautiously, given the poor methodological quality of the included studies, and potential small-study effects. Further larger, high-quality, rigorous RCTs should be conducted on this topic and rigorous reporting of acupotomy procedures and safety data should be encouraged." @default.
• W2967210014 created "2019-08-22" @default.
• W2967210014 creator A5014243154 @default.
• W2967210014 creator A5039242789 @default.
• W2967210014 creator A5042652794 @default.
• W2967210014 creator A5073243475 @default.
• W2967210014 date "2019-08-01" @default.
• W2967210014 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2967210014 title "Acupotomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis" @default.
• W2967210014 cites W1925856372 @default.
• W2967210014 cites W1954265004 @default.
• W2967210014 cites W1967734681 @default.
• W2967210014 cites W1975961740 @default.
• W2967210014 cites W2000006092 @default.
• W2967210014 cites W2002424736 @default.
• W2967210014 cites W2022395874 @default.
• W2967210014 cites W2022593004 @default.
• W2967210014 cites W2026299771 @default.
• W2967210014 cites W2079826869 @default.
• W2967210014 cites W2087198262 @default.
• W2967210014 cites W2109887283 @default.
• W2967210014 cites W2137709501 @default.
• W2967210014 cites W2157244868 @default.
• W2967210014 cites W2163553517 @default.
• W2967210014 cites W2177515365 @default.
• W2967210014 cites W2207413127 @default.
• W2967210014 cites W2488271697 @default.
• W2967210014 cites W2518895015 @default.
• W2967210014 cites W2581277369 @default.
• W2967210014 cites W2594000043 @default.
• W2967210014 cites W2767793280 @default.
• W2967210014 cites W2800834778 @default.
• W2967210014 cites W2884764614 @default.
• W2967210014 cites W2896367416 @default.
• W2967210014 cites W2897344298 @default.
• W2967210014 cites W2909599017 @default.
• W2967210014 cites W3022903699 @default.
• W2967210014 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000016662" @default.
• W2967210014 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6708781" @default.
• W2967210014 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31393365" @default.
• W2967210014 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2967210014 type Work @default.
• W2967210014 sameAs 2967210014 @default.
• W2967210014 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W2967210014 countsByYear W29672100142020 @default.
• W2967210014 countsByYear W29672100142021 @default.
• W2967210014 countsByYear W29672100142022 @default.
• W2967210014 countsByYear W29672100142023 @default.
• W2967210014 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2967210014 hasAuthorship W2967210014A5014243154 @default.
• W2967210014 hasAuthorship W2967210014A5039242789 @default.
• W2967210014 hasAuthorship W2967210014A5042652794 @default.
• W2967210014 hasAuthorship W2967210014A5073243475 @default.
• W2967210014 hasBestOaLocation W29672100141 @default.
• W2967210014 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2967210014 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2967210014 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2967210014 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2967210014 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2967210014 hasConcept C2779631646 @default.
• W2967210014 hasConcept C2780054614 @default.
• W2967210014 hasConcept C2780175798 @default.
• W2967210014 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2967210014 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W2967210014 hasConcept C56837625 @default.
• W2967210014 hasConcept C68312169 @default.
• W2967210014 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2967210014 hasConceptScore W2967210014C126322002 @default.
• W2967210014 hasConceptScore W2967210014C141071460 @default.
• W2967210014 hasConceptScore W2967210014C142724271 @default.
• W2967210014 hasConceptScore W2967210014C168563851 @default.
• W2967210014 hasConceptScore W2967210014C204787440 @default.
• W2967210014 hasConceptScore W2967210014C2779631646 @default.
• W2967210014 hasConceptScore W2967210014C2780054614 @default.
• W2967210014 hasConceptScore W2967210014C2780175798 @default.
• W2967210014 hasConceptScore W2967210014C44249647 @default.
• W2967210014 hasConceptScore W2967210014C44575665 @default.
• W2967210014 hasConceptScore W2967210014C56837625 @default.
• W2967210014 hasConceptScore W2967210014C68312169 @default.
• W2967210014 hasConceptScore W2967210014C71924100 @default.
• W2967210014 hasIssue "32" @default.
• W2967210014 hasLocation W29672100141 @default.
• W2967210014 hasLocation W29672100142 @default.
• W2967210014 hasLocation W29672100143 @default.
• W2967210014 hasLocation W29672100144 @default.
• W2967210014 hasOpenAccess W2967210014 @default.
• W2967210014 hasPrimaryLocation W29672100141 @default.
• W2967210014 hasRelatedWork W1979400516 @default.
• W2967210014 hasRelatedWork W1999741373 @default.
• W2967210014 hasRelatedWork W2027767127 @default.
• W2967210014 hasRelatedWork W2107008043 @default.
• W2967210014 hasRelatedWork W2381882554 @default.
• W2967210014 hasRelatedWork W2390717444 @default.
• W2967210014 hasRelatedWork W2529623589 @default.
• W2967210014 hasRelatedWork W2760979117 @default.
• W2967210014 hasRelatedWork W2969986911 @default.
• W2967210014 hasRelatedWork W3030218829 @default.
• W2967210014 hasVolume "98" @default.

• next