FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2967503100> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2967503100 endingPage "25" @default.
• W2967503100 startingPage "19" @default.
• W2967503100 abstract "Background Various guidelines recommend several sampling techniques to verify endoscope reprocessing, but a comparative study of the efficiency for recovering microorganisms was rare. Our goal was to compare different sampling techniques for the postreprocessing endoscope to assess residual bacterial contamination and analysis of the critical factors affecting the endoscope reprocessing failure. Methods From 2016 to 2018, 3 techniques, the conventional flushing sampling method, flush-brush-flush sampling method (FBFSM), and pump-assisted sampling method (PASM), were compared covering all 59 endoscope units in Tianjin, China. Results A total of 237 (84.64%) flushing channel samples and 110 (61.11%) final rinse water samples met the Chinese national standard. The univariate analysis showed that the qualified rates of endoscope reprocessing sampled by PASM (65.52%) and FBFSM (75%) were significantly lower than those of the conventional flushing sampling method (91.38%). Five other factors, including the final rinse water, dry, and hospital level, were potential factors besides sample technique. The multivariate logistic analysis indicated only 2 factors (sampling technique and final rinse water) remained in the model. FBFSM, PASM, and the purified water were significantly associated with the odds of endoscope reprocessing failure, with the odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of which were 4.206 (1.757-10.067), 5.326 (2.463-11.645), and 0.309 (0.137-0.695), respectively. Conclusions The problem of residual microorganisms of the postreprocessing endoscope was severe. Sampling technique and final rinse water were critical for endoscope reprocessing verification. Various guidelines recommend several sampling techniques to verify endoscope reprocessing, but a comparative study of the efficiency for recovering microorganisms was rare. Our goal was to compare different sampling techniques for the postreprocessing endoscope to assess residual bacterial contamination and analysis of the critical factors affecting the endoscope reprocessing failure. From 2016 to 2018, 3 techniques, the conventional flushing sampling method, flush-brush-flush sampling method (FBFSM), and pump-assisted sampling method (PASM), were compared covering all 59 endoscope units in Tianjin, China. A total of 237 (84.64%) flushing channel samples and 110 (61.11%) final rinse water samples met the Chinese national standard. The univariate analysis showed that the qualified rates of endoscope reprocessing sampled by PASM (65.52%) and FBFSM (75%) were significantly lower than those of the conventional flushing sampling method (91.38%). Five other factors, including the final rinse water, dry, and hospital level, were potential factors besides sample technique. The multivariate logistic analysis indicated only 2 factors (sampling technique and final rinse water) remained in the model. FBFSM, PASM, and the purified water were significantly associated with the odds of endoscope reprocessing failure, with the odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of which were 4.206 (1.757-10.067), 5.326 (2.463-11.645), and 0.309 (0.137-0.695), respectively. The problem of residual microorganisms of the postreprocessing endoscope was severe. Sampling technique and final rinse water were critical for endoscope reprocessing verification." @default.
• W2967503100 created "2019-08-22" @default.
• W2967503100 creator A5058266537 @default.
• W2967503100 creator A5069678411 @default.
• W2967503100 creator A5079221798 @default.
• W2967503100 creator A5080225520 @default.
• W2967503100 creator A5082347867 @default.
• W2967503100 creator A5089823308 @default.
• W2967503100 date "2020-01-01" @default.
• W2967503100 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2967503100 title "The importance of sampling technique and rinse water for assessing flexible gastrointestinal endoscope reprocessing: A 3-year study covering 59 centers" @default.
• W2967503100 cites W1493080630 @default.
• W2967503100 cites W1993066230 @default.
• W2967503100 cites W2000901232 @default.
• W2967503100 cites W2015672147 @default.
• W2967503100 cites W2032535846 @default.
• W2967503100 cites W2056405061 @default.
• W2967503100 cites W2080814638 @default.
• W2967503100 cites W2101477502 @default.
• W2967503100 cites W2116463939 @default.
• W2967503100 cites W2122836009 @default.
• W2967503100 cites W2126313920 @default.
• W2967503100 cites W2128843860 @default.
• W2967503100 cites W2145835547 @default.
• W2967503100 cites W2320185386 @default.
• W2967503100 cites W2343400271 @default.
• W2967503100 cites W2507348508 @default.
• W2967503100 cites W2546641433 @default.
• W2967503100 cites W2569617874 @default.
• W2967503100 cites W2719163304 @default.
• W2967503100 cites W2765480503 @default.
• W2967503100 cites W2796705381 @default.
• W2967503100 cites W2796736573 @default.
• W2967503100 cites W2811321620 @default.
• W2967503100 cites W2886389519 @default.
• W2967503100 cites W2898409224 @default.
• W2967503100 cites W4321429411 @default.
• W2967503100 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2019.07.008" @default.
• W2967503100 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31400884" @default.
• W2967503100 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W2967503100 type Work @default.
• W2967503100 sameAs 2967503100 @default.
• W2967503100 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W2967503100 countsByYear W29675031002020 @default.
• W2967503100 countsByYear W29675031002021 @default.
• W2967503100 countsByYear W29675031002022 @default.
• W2967503100 countsByYear W29675031002023 @default.
• W2967503100 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2967503100 hasAuthorship W2967503100A5058266537 @default.
• W2967503100 hasAuthorship W2967503100A5069678411 @default.
• W2967503100 hasAuthorship W2967503100A5079221798 @default.
• W2967503100 hasAuthorship W2967503100A5080225520 @default.
• W2967503100 hasAuthorship W2967503100A5082347867 @default.
• W2967503100 hasAuthorship W2967503100A5089823308 @default.
• W2967503100 hasConcept C106131492 @default.
• W2967503100 hasConcept C119599485 @default.
• W2967503100 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2967503100 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2967503100 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
• W2967503100 hasConcept C136229726 @default.
• W2967503100 hasConcept C140779682 @default.
• W2967503100 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2967503100 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2967503100 hasConcept C2776820786 @default.
• W2967503100 hasConcept C2778520758 @default.
• W2967503100 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W2967503100 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2967503100 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2967503100 hasConcept C72092618 @default.
• W2967503100 hasConceptScore W2967503100C106131492 @default.
• W2967503100 hasConceptScore W2967503100C119599485 @default.
• W2967503100 hasConceptScore W2967503100C126322002 @default.
• W2967503100 hasConceptScore W2967503100C127413603 @default.
• W2967503100 hasConceptScore W2967503100C134018914 @default.
• W2967503100 hasConceptScore W2967503100C136229726 @default.
• W2967503100 hasConceptScore W2967503100C140779682 @default.
• W2967503100 hasConceptScore W2967503100C141071460 @default.
• W2967503100 hasConceptScore W2967503100C185592680 @default.
• W2967503100 hasConceptScore W2967503100C2776820786 @default.
• W2967503100 hasConceptScore W2967503100C2778520758 @default.
• W2967503100 hasConceptScore W2967503100C43617362 @default.
• W2967503100 hasConceptScore W2967503100C44249647 @default.
• W2967503100 hasConceptScore W2967503100C71924100 @default.
• W2967503100 hasConceptScore W2967503100C72092618 @default.
• W2967503100 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2967503100 hasLocation W29675031001 @default.
• W2967503100 hasOpenAccess W2967503100 @default.
• W2967503100 hasPrimaryLocation W29675031001 @default.
• W2967503100 hasRelatedWork W1586374228 @default.
• W2967503100 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W2967503100 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W2967503100 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W2967503100 hasRelatedWork W2364998975 @default.
• W2967503100 hasRelatedWork W2369162477 @default.
• W2967503100 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W2967503100 hasRelatedWork W2967503100 @default.
• W2967503100 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
• W2967503100 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.

• next