FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2967781477> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2967781477 endingPage "e13619" @default.
• W2967781477 startingPage "e13619" @default.
• W2967781477 abstract "Background To decide whether online health information is reliable, information seekers apply 2 stretegies: first, information seekers can make credibility judgments by using their prior knowledge to evaluate the validity of the encountered health claim. Second, instead of evaluating the health claim itself, information seekers can make trustworthiness judgments by evaluating the character of the information source. In recent years, information givers from various professions have begun to use enthusiastic language to disseminate their information and persuade their audiences. Objective To systematically explore this phenomenon, the goal of this study was to answer the following research questions: (1) does an enthusiastic language style, in comparison with a neutral language style, increase the trustworthiness of a person arguing in an online health forum and the credibility of his or her information? (2) does working for a university, in comparison with working for a lobbying organization, increase the trustworthiness of a person arguing in an online health forum and the credibility of his or her information? (3) does working for a university in combination with using an enthusiastic language style result in especially high trustworthiness and credibility ratings? Methods In a 2x2 between-subject online experiment, 270 participants read a post from an online health forum and subsequently rated the trustworthiness of the forum post author and the credibility of his information. A total of 2 aspects of the forum post varied, namely the professional affiliation of the forum post author (whether the person introduced himself as a scientist or a lobbyist) and his language style (whether he used a neutral language style or an enthusiastic language style). Results When the forum post author used an enthusiastic language style, he was perceived as more manipulative (P<.001), less knowledgeable (P<.001), and his information was perceived as less credible (P<.001). Overall, scientists were perceived as less manipulative (P=.04) than lobbyists. Furthermore, language style and professional affiliation interacted: When the forum post author was a lobbyist, language style did not affect integrity (P=.96) and benevolence (P=.79) ratings. However, when the forum post author was a scientist, enthusiastic language led to lower integrity (P=.002) and benevolence (P<.001) ratings than neutral language. Conclusions The current findings illustrate that health information seekers do not just react to online health information itself. In addition, they are also sensitive to the ways in which health information is presented (“Which langue style is used to communicate health information?”) and who presents it (“Who does the health information source work for?”)." @default.
• W2967781477 created "2019-08-22" @default.
• W2967781477 creator A5052986972 @default.
• W2967781477 creator A5064974435 @default.
• W2967781477 date "2019-08-12" @default.
• W2967781477 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W2967781477 title "Influence of Enthusiastic Language on the Credibility of Health Information and the Trustworthiness of Science Communicators: Insights From a Between-Subject Web-Based Experiment" @default.
• W2967781477 cites W1508150034 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W1539896512 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W1549054622 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W1758467489 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W1975031350 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W1976072050 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W1988705120 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W1991032455 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2012085623 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2036053872 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2055952423 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2058779973 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2075524384 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2081542610 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2101183980 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2106536293 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2116926372 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2140014148 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2149252394 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2155912229 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2157392583 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2158253198 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2159989452 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2177498430 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2198222678 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2218357479 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2226568208 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2233116106 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2269213754 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2290441761 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2392395656 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2487925411 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2507706845 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2607344115 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2766908081 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2784537350 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2785022151 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2787059579 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2794076960 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2804246741 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2921357946 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W2921365545 @default.
• W2967781477 cites W369650640 @default.
• W2967781477 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/13619" @default.
• W2967781477 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6711041" @default.
• W2967781477 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31411138" @default.
• W2967781477 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2967781477 type Work @default.
• W2967781477 sameAs 2967781477 @default.
• W2967781477 citedByCount "11" @default.
• W2967781477 countsByYear W29677814772020 @default.
• W2967781477 countsByYear W29677814772021 @default.
• W2967781477 countsByYear W29677814772022 @default.
• W2967781477 countsByYear W29677814772023 @default.
• W2967781477 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2967781477 hasAuthorship W2967781477A5052986972 @default.
• W2967781477 hasAuthorship W2967781477A5064974435 @default.
• W2967781477 hasBestOaLocation W29677814771 @default.
• W2967781477 hasConcept C108827166 @default.
• W2967781477 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2967781477 hasConcept C153701036 @default.
• W2967781477 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2967781477 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2967781477 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2967781477 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2967781477 hasConcept C2776445246 @default.
• W2967781477 hasConcept C2776493517 @default.
• W2967781477 hasConcept C2777855551 @default.
• W2967781477 hasConcept C2780224610 @default.
• W2967781477 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2967781477 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2967781477 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2967781477 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2967781477 hasConceptScore W2967781477C108827166 @default.
• W2967781477 hasConceptScore W2967781477C136764020 @default.
• W2967781477 hasConceptScore W2967781477C153701036 @default.
• W2967781477 hasConceptScore W2967781477C15744967 @default.
• W2967781477 hasConceptScore W2967781477C166957645 @default.
• W2967781477 hasConceptScore W2967781477C17744445 @default.
• W2967781477 hasConceptScore W2967781477C199539241 @default.
• W2967781477 hasConceptScore W2967781477C2776445246 @default.
• W2967781477 hasConceptScore W2967781477C2776493517 @default.
• W2967781477 hasConceptScore W2967781477C2777855551 @default.
• W2967781477 hasConceptScore W2967781477C2780224610 @default.
• W2967781477 hasConceptScore W2967781477C39549134 @default.
• W2967781477 hasConceptScore W2967781477C41008148 @default.
• W2967781477 hasConceptScore W2967781477C77805123 @default.
• W2967781477 hasConceptScore W2967781477C95457728 @default.
• W2967781477 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2967781477 hasLocation W29677814771 @default.
• W2967781477 hasLocation W29677814772 @default.

• next