FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2969220975> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2969220975 endingPage "S6" @default.
• W2969220975 startingPage "S6" @default.
• W2969220975 abstract "BACKGROUND CONTEXT In the current era of value-based health care reform, engaging patients in shared decision-making for treatment planning is imperative. Predictive models capable of providing individualized predictions of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following cervical spine surgery have the potential to be valuable tools for a shared decision-making process. PURPOSE The aim of the study is to develop and validate predictive models for 12-month postoperative disability, pain, and myelopathy outcomes in patients undergoing elective spine surgery for degenerative cervical diseases (radiculopathy and myelopathy). STUDY DESIGN/SETTING This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the cervical module of a national spine registry, the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD). PATIENT SAMPLE Patients undergoing cervical spine surgery for the diagnosis of radiculopathy or myelopathy with degenerative etiologies are eligible for inclusion in the QOD registry. OUTCOME MEASURES The outcomes of interest in this study were neck related disability (NDI), pain [NRS- neck pain (NP) and arm pain (AP)] and modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score for myelopathy (mJOA). METHODS Two distinct sets of multivariable proportional odds ordinal regression models were developed with the outcomes of interest of disability (NDI), pain (NRS-NP and NRS-AP) and myelopathy (mJOA) score in the myelopathy cohort and disability (NDI) and pain (NRS-NP and NRS-AP) in the radiculopathy cohort. Patient characteristics of age, gender, BMI, race, education level, smoking status, history of diabetes, anxiety and depression, symptom duration, motor deficit or numbness at presentation, preoperative imaging finding of listhesis, employment status, workers’ compensation, insurance status, and ambulatory ability, baseline PROs as well as surgery-specific variables of number of levels, arthrodesis, and surgical approach were included in the models. The models were internally validated using bootstrap resampling. RESULTS A total of 5,076 patients who underwent surgery for cervical radiculopathy and 2717 patients who underwent surgery for cervical myelopathy were included in fitting the models for the distinct set of outcomes. There was a significant improvement in all PROs at 12 months after surgery (P CONCLUSIONS These predictive models can provide individualized risk-adjusted estimates of 12-month disability, pain, and myelopathy outcomes for patients undergoing spine surgery for degenerative cervical diseases. Novel predictive models constructed with these data hold the potential to guide individualized patient discussions on postsurgical outcomes and expectations. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs." @default.
• W2969220975 created "2019-08-29" @default.
• W2969220975 creator A5010612424 @default.
• W2969220975 creator A5010883015 @default.
• W2969220975 creator A5024360274 @default.
• W2969220975 creator A5027379255 @default.
• W2969220975 creator A5030704684 @default.
• W2969220975 creator A5036650201 @default.
• W2969220975 creator A5042352003 @default.
• W2969220975 creator A5053158864 @default.
• W2969220975 date "2019-09-01" @default.
• W2969220975 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2969220975 title "11. Predicting disability and pain outcomes one year after elective surgery for degenerative cervical diseases: analysis from quality outcomes database" @default.
• W2969220975 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2019.05.024" @default.
• W2969220975 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2969220975 type Work @default.
• W2969220975 sameAs 2969220975 @default.
• W2969220975 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2969220975 countsByYear W29692209752022 @default.
• W2969220975 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2969220975 hasAuthorship W2969220975A5010612424 @default.
• W2969220975 hasAuthorship W2969220975A5010883015 @default.
• W2969220975 hasAuthorship W2969220975A5024360274 @default.
• W2969220975 hasAuthorship W2969220975A5027379255 @default.
• W2969220975 hasAuthorship W2969220975A5030704684 @default.
• W2969220975 hasAuthorship W2969220975A5036650201 @default.
• W2969220975 hasAuthorship W2969220975A5042352003 @default.
• W2969220975 hasAuthorship W2969220975A5053158864 @default.
• W2969220975 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2969220975 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2969220975 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2969220975 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
• W2969220975 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2969220975 hasConceptScore W2969220975C141071460 @default.
• W2969220975 hasConceptScore W2969220975C159110408 @default.
• W2969220975 hasConceptScore W2969220975C1862650 @default.
• W2969220975 hasConceptScore W2969220975C2779951463 @default.
• W2969220975 hasConceptScore W2969220975C71924100 @default.
• W2969220975 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W2969220975 hasLocation W29692209751 @default.
• W2969220975 hasOpenAccess W2969220975 @default.
• W2969220975 hasPrimaryLocation W29692209751 @default.
• W2969220975 hasRelatedWork W2002120878 @default.
• W2969220975 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W2969220975 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W2969220975 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W2969220975 hasRelatedWork W2364998975 @default.
• W2969220975 hasRelatedWork W2369162477 @default.
• W2969220975 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W2969220975 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
• W2969220975 hasRelatedWork W2519357708 @default.
• W2969220975 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W2969220975 hasVolume "19" @default.
• W2969220975 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2969220975 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2969220975 magId "2969220975" @default.
• W2969220975 workType "article" @default.