FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2969249976> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2969249976 endingPage "479" @default.
• W2969249976 startingPage "474" @default.
• W2969249976 abstract "To evaluate the possible impact of stone impaction in terms of ureteral wall thickness (UWT) on the success and procedure related parameters of ureteroscopic management in proximal ureteral calculi. 82 patients with proximal ureteric stones were included and were divided into two subgroups where UWT was >5 mm in 38 cases; and <5 mm in 44 cases. Stone size, degree of hydronehrosis, diameter of proximal ureteral lumen, UWT and patient's demographics were evaluated. Semi-rigid ureteroscopy with Ho-YAG laser was performed and the possible impact of UWT as an objective parameter for stone impaction on the success rates and procedure related parameters was evaluated. Mean patient age and stone size values were 47.55 ± 1.78 years and 8.17 ± 0.29 mm respectively. Regarding the impact of UWT value at the stone site for the parameters mentioned above stone free rates particularly at 1-week after the procedure was higher in group 2 and the rate of residual fragments as well as the need for double J stent placement was higher in group 1. Additionally, mean duration of the procedures was significantly longer in Group 1 during which pathologic alterations were significantly higher in ureteral wall at stone site were observed in these cases (p:0.0243). UWT may be used to predict the success of ureteroscopic management and other procedure related parameters for proximal ureteral stones in an effective manner. With this approach a more rational operative plan with higher success rates, limited complications and auxiliary procedures could be made. Evaluar la relación del espesor de la pared ureteral (EPU) con el éxito y parámetros relacionados con la ureteroscopia para el tratamiento de cálculos ureterales proximales. se incluyeron 82 pacientes con cálculos ureterales proximales y se dividieron en dos subgrupos de acuerdo con el grosor de la pared ureteral: un grupo con 38 pacientes, EPU > 5 mm; y el segundo con 44, EPU < 5 mm. Se evaluaron los siguientes parámetros: tamaño de la piedra, grado de hidronefrosis, diámetro de la luz ureteral proximal, el EPU y los datos demográficos de los pacientes. Se realizó ureteroscopia semirrígida con láser Ho-YAG y se evaluó el posible impacto del EPU sobre las tasas de éxito y los parámetros relacionados con el procedimiento. La media de edad de los pacientes y el tamaño de los cálculos fue 47.55 ± 1.78 años y 8.17 ± 0.29 mm respectivamente. Con respecto al impacto del valor de EPU sobre los parámetros mencionados anteriormente, la tasa libre de cálculos una semana después del procedimiento fue mayor en el grupo 2 y la tasa de fragmentos residuales, así como la necesidad de colocación de catéter doble J, fueron mas altas en el grupo 1. Adicionalmente, la duración media del procedimiento fue significativamente más larga en el Grupo 1, y se observaron alteraciones patológicas en la pared ureteral significativamente mayores en estos casos (p: 0.0243). el EPU es un factor útil al predecir el éxito del tratamiento ureteroscópico y otros parámetros relacionados con el procedimiento para los cálculos ureterales proximales. Con este enfoque, se podría realizar un plan operativo más adecuado, con mayores tasas de éxito, menos complicaciones y procedimientos adicionales." @default.
• W2969249976 created "2019-08-29" @default.
• W2969249976 creator A5049314690 @default.
• W2969249976 creator A5053239431 @default.
• W2969249976 creator A5067151953 @default.
• W2969249976 creator A5070543031 @default.
• W2969249976 creator A5077274691 @default.
• W2969249976 creator A5083018244 @default.
• W2969249976 date "2019-11-01" @default.
• W2969249976 modified "2023-10-06" @default.
• W2969249976 title "Could ureteral wall thickness have an impact on the operative and post-operative parameters in ureteroscopic management of proximal ureteral stones?" @default.
• W2969249976 cites W1236439116 @default.
• W2969249976 cites W1970514382 @default.
• W2969249976 cites W1985455100 @default.
• W2969249976 cites W1988351167 @default.
• W2969249976 cites W2006703951 @default.
• W2969249976 cites W2012529271 @default.
• W2969249976 cites W2027245130 @default.
• W2969249976 cites W2045044796 @default.
• W2969249976 cites W2049924573 @default.
• W2969249976 cites W2074830087 @default.
• W2969249976 cites W2080362554 @default.
• W2969249976 cites W2081326049 @default.
• W2969249976 cites W2087565710 @default.
• W2969249976 cites W2089660001 @default.
• W2969249976 cites W2093141410 @default.
• W2969249976 cites W2095471272 @default.
• W2969249976 cites W2111323078 @default.
• W2969249976 cites W2127047578 @default.
• W2969249976 cites W2163323247 @default.
• W2969249976 cites W2569955245 @default.
• W2969249976 cites W2600842843 @default.
• W2969249976 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuroe.2018.10.007" @default.
• W2969249976 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31155374" @default.
• W2969249976 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2969249976 type Work @default.
• W2969249976 sameAs 2969249976 @default.
• W2969249976 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2969249976 countsByYear W29692499762022 @default.
• W2969249976 countsByYear W29692499762023 @default.
• W2969249976 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2969249976 hasAuthorship W2969249976A5049314690 @default.
• W2969249976 hasAuthorship W2969249976A5053239431 @default.
• W2969249976 hasAuthorship W2969249976A5067151953 @default.
• W2969249976 hasAuthorship W2969249976A5070543031 @default.
• W2969249976 hasAuthorship W2969249976A5077274691 @default.
• W2969249976 hasAuthorship W2969249976A5083018244 @default.
• W2969249976 hasConcept C126894567 @default.
• W2969249976 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2969249976 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2969249976 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2969249976 hasConcept C2776664737 @default.
• W2969249976 hasConcept C2778583881 @default.
• W2969249976 hasConcept C2780051367 @default.
• W2969249976 hasConcept C2780084366 @default.
• W2969249976 hasConcept C2780653459 @default.
• W2969249976 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2969249976 hasConceptScore W2969249976C126894567 @default.
• W2969249976 hasConceptScore W2969249976C141071460 @default.
• W2969249976 hasConceptScore W2969249976C144024400 @default.
• W2969249976 hasConceptScore W2969249976C149923435 @default.
• W2969249976 hasConceptScore W2969249976C2776664737 @default.
• W2969249976 hasConceptScore W2969249976C2778583881 @default.
• W2969249976 hasConceptScore W2969249976C2780051367 @default.
• W2969249976 hasConceptScore W2969249976C2780084366 @default.
• W2969249976 hasConceptScore W2969249976C2780653459 @default.
• W2969249976 hasConceptScore W2969249976C71924100 @default.
• W2969249976 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W2969249976 hasLocation W29692499761 @default.
• W2969249976 hasOpenAccess W2969249976 @default.
• W2969249976 hasPrimaryLocation W29692499761 @default.
• W2969249976 hasRelatedWork W2116747174 @default.
• W2969249976 hasRelatedWork W2368908501 @default.
• W2969249976 hasRelatedWork W2374124747 @default.
• W2969249976 hasRelatedWork W2593011982 @default.
• W2969249976 hasRelatedWork W2766631057 @default.
• W2969249976 hasRelatedWork W2784151091 @default.
• W2969249976 hasRelatedWork W2897536632 @default.
• W2969249976 hasRelatedWork W3141087629 @default.
• W2969249976 hasRelatedWork W4237899154 @default.
• W2969249976 hasRelatedWork W4308319100 @default.
• W2969249976 hasVolume "43" @default.
• W2969249976 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2969249976 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2969249976 magId "2969249976" @default.
• W2969249976 workType "article" @default.