FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2969318181> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2969318181 endingPage "e199782" @default.
• W2969318181 startingPage "e199782" @default.
• W2969318181 abstract "In the At Home/Chez Soi trial for homeless individuals with mental illness, the scattered-site Housing First (HF) with Intensive Case Management (ICM) intervention proved more effective than treatment as usual (TAU).To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the HF plus ICM intervention compared with TAU.This is an economic evaluation study of data from the At Home/Chez Soi randomized clinical trial. From October 2009 through July 2011, 1198 individuals were randomized to the intervention (n = 689) or TAU (n = 509) and followed up for as long as 24 months. Participants were recruited in the Canadian cities of Vancouver, Winnipeg, Toronto, and Montreal. Participants with a current mental disorder who were homeless and had a moderate level of need were included. Data were analyzed from 2013 through 2019, per protocol.Scattered-site HF (using rent supplements) with off-site ICM services was compared with usual housing and support services in each city.The analysis was performed from the perspective of society, with days of stable housing as the outcome. Service use was ascertained using questionnaires. Unit costs were estimated in 2016 Canadian dollars.Of 1198 randomized individuals, 795 (66.4%) were men and 696 (58.1%) were aged 30 to 49 years. Almost all (1160 participants, including 677 in the HF group and 483 in the TAU group) contributed data to the economic analysis. Days of stable housing were higher by 140.34 days (95% CI, 128.14-153.31 days) in the HF group. The intervention cost $14 496 per person per year; reductions in costs of other services brought the net cost down by 46% to $7868 (95% CI, $4409-$11 405). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $56.08 (95% CI, $29.55-$84.78) per additional day of stable housing. In sensitivity analyses, adjusting for baseline differences using a regression-based method, without altering the discount rate, caused the largest change in the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio with an increase to $60.18 (95% CI, $35.27-$86.95). At $67 per day of stable housing, there was an 80% chance that HF was cost-effective compared with TAU. The cost-effectiveness of HF appeared to be similar for all participants, although possibly less for those with a higher number of previous psychiatric hospitalizations.In this study, the cost per additional day of stable housing was similar to that of many interventions for homeless individuals. Based on these results, expanding access to HF with ICM appears to be warranted from an economic standpoint.isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN42520374." @default.
• W2969318181 created "2019-08-29" @default.
• W2969318181 creator A5020473920 @default.
• W2969318181 creator A5022470998 @default.
• W2969318181 creator A5029561619 @default.
• W2969318181 creator A5033284768 @default.
• W2969318181 creator A5040631766 @default.
• W2969318181 creator A5042533270 @default.
• W2969318181 creator A5048550846 @default.
• W2969318181 creator A5052646822 @default.
• W2969318181 creator A5062712325 @default.
• W2969318181 creator A5065724432 @default.
• W2969318181 creator A5081379762 @default.
• W2969318181 creator A5082581826 @default.
• W2969318181 creator A5083672700 @default.
• W2969318181 date "2019-08-21" @default.
• W2969318181 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2969318181 title "Cost-effectiveness of Housing First Intervention With Intensive Case Management Compared With Treatment as Usual for Homeless Adults With Mental Illness" @default.
• W2969318181 cites W1572742819 @default.
• W2969318181 cites W1820811333 @default.
• W2969318181 cites W1919216911 @default.
• W2969318181 cites W1979174033 @default.
• W2969318181 cites W1982564323 @default.
• W2969318181 cites W2044476836 @default.
• W2969318181 cites W2047391263 @default.
• W2969318181 cites W2051593700 @default.
• W2969318181 cites W2060190592 @default.
• W2969318181 cites W2071477485 @default.
• W2969318181 cites W2075240722 @default.
• W2969318181 cites W2103440713 @default.
• W2969318181 cites W2107329907 @default.
• W2969318181 cites W2108592835 @default.
• W2969318181 cites W2128911553 @default.
• W2969318181 cites W2130191795 @default.
• W2969318181 cites W2147656358 @default.
• W2969318181 cites W2155846794 @default.
• W2969318181 cites W2156085089 @default.
• W2969318181 cites W2157041994 @default.
• W2969318181 cites W2166747936 @default.
• W2969318181 cites W2167217295 @default.
• W2969318181 cites W2187246823 @default.
• W2969318181 cites W2282665669 @default.
• W2969318181 cites W2317659795 @default.
• W2969318181 cites W2416467697 @default.
• W2969318181 cites W2559887462 @default.
• W2969318181 cites W2737056416 @default.
• W2969318181 cites W3122954206 @default.
• W2969318181 cites W4240640476 @default.
• W2969318181 cites W4247989408 @default.
• W2969318181 doi "https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9782" @default.
• W2969318181 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6707012" @default.
• W2969318181 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31433483" @default.
• W2969318181 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2969318181 type Work @default.
• W2969318181 sameAs 2969318181 @default.
• W2969318181 citedByCount "37" @default.
• W2969318181 countsByYear W29693181812018 @default.
• W2969318181 countsByYear W29693181812019 @default.
• W2969318181 countsByYear W29693181812020 @default.
• W2969318181 countsByYear W29693181812021 @default.
• W2969318181 countsByYear W29693181812022 @default.
• W2969318181 countsByYear W29693181812023 @default.
• W2969318181 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2969318181 hasAuthorship W2969318181A5020473920 @default.
• W2969318181 hasAuthorship W2969318181A5022470998 @default.
• W2969318181 hasAuthorship W2969318181A5029561619 @default.
• W2969318181 hasAuthorship W2969318181A5033284768 @default.
• W2969318181 hasAuthorship W2969318181A5040631766 @default.
• W2969318181 hasAuthorship W2969318181A5042533270 @default.
• W2969318181 hasAuthorship W2969318181A5048550846 @default.
• W2969318181 hasAuthorship W2969318181A5052646822 @default.
• W2969318181 hasAuthorship W2969318181A5062712325 @default.
• W2969318181 hasAuthorship W2969318181A5065724432 @default.
• W2969318181 hasAuthorship W2969318181A5081379762 @default.
• W2969318181 hasAuthorship W2969318181A5082581826 @default.
• W2969318181 hasAuthorship W2969318181A5083672700 @default.
• W2969318181 hasBestOaLocation W29693181811 @default.
• W2969318181 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2969318181 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2969318181 hasConcept C134362201 @default.
• W2969318181 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2969318181 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2969318181 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2969318181 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2969318181 hasConcept C2776125615 @default.
• W2969318181 hasConcept C2776674806 @default.
• W2969318181 hasConcept C2779341259 @default.
• W2969318181 hasConcept C2780084376 @default.
• W2969318181 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
• W2969318181 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2969318181 hasConcept C74909509 @default.
• W2969318181 hasConceptScore W2969318181C118552586 @default.
• W2969318181 hasConceptScore W2969318181C126322002 @default.
• W2969318181 hasConceptScore W2969318181C134362201 @default.
• W2969318181 hasConceptScore W2969318181C142724271 @default.
• W2969318181 hasConceptScore W2969318181C144024400 @default.
• W2969318181 hasConceptScore W2969318181C149923435 @default.
• W2969318181 hasConceptScore W2969318181C168563851 @default.

• next