FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2969774265> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2969774265 endingPage "7" @default.
• W2969774265 startingPage "1" @default.
• W2969774265 abstract "Introduction . Airway management is one of key elements of resuscitation. Endotracheal intubation is still considered the gold standard for airway management during resuscitation. Aim . The aim of the study was to compare success rates and intubation time of different endotracheal intubation methods during emergency intubation with difficult airways in the conditions of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a standardized manikin model. Methods . The study was designed as a prospective, randomized, cross-over simulation study. It involved 46 paramedics with at least 5 years of experience in Emergency Medical Service. The participants performed endotracheal intubation under difficult airway conditions during continuous chest compression, implemented with the LUCAS3 chest compression system. Three methods of tracheal intubation were applied: (1) standard Macintosh laryngoscope without a bougie stylet; (2) standard laryngoscope and a standard bougie stylet; (3) standard laryngoscope and a new bougie stylet. Results . The overall intubation success rate was 100% in the standard bougie and new bougie groups and lower (86.9%) when no bougie stylet was used (P=0.028). The intubation success rate with the <mml:math xmlns:mml=http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML id=M1><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant=normal>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant=normal>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant=normal>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math> attempt equalled 91.3% for the new bougie group, 73.9% for standard bougie, and only 23.9% in the no-bougie group. The median intubation time was shortest in the new bougie group, where it amounted to 29 s (interquartile range [IQR]: 25–38); the time equalled 38s (IQR:31–44.5) in the standard bougie group and 47.5s (IQR:36–58) in the no-bougie group. The ease of use was lowest in the no-bougie group (85, IQR:63–88), average in the standard bougie group (44, IQR:30–51), and highest in the new bougie stylet group (32, IQR:19–41). Conclusion . In this manikin-based study, paramedics were able to perform endotracheal intubation with higher efficacy and in a shorter time using the new bougie stylet as compared with the standard bougie stylet." @default.
• W2969774265 created "2019-08-29" @default.
• W2969774265 creator A5000093563 @default.
• W2969774265 creator A5005992662 @default.
• W2969774265 creator A5006846955 @default.
• W2969774265 creator A5018538601 @default.
• W2969774265 creator A5022117993 @default.
• W2969774265 creator A5037881521 @default.
• W2969774265 creator A5084459767 @default.
• W2969774265 date "2019-08-20" @default.
• W2969774265 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2969774265 title "Comparison of Different Intubation Methods in Difficult Airways during Simulated Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Continuous Chest Compression: A Randomized Cross-Over Manikin Trial" @default.
• W2969774265 cites W1552690549 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W1701590580 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W1999634622 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2090441441 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2107602448 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2111858874 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2133134420 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2161613744 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2212748511 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2216907273 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2280027057 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2520418299 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2548998089 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2556719892 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2560214603 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2563645466 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2565915284 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2596339983 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2606310750 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2772977823 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2774892946 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2797965138 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2803538670 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2803728303 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2885690797 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2888757376 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2888973450 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2889518140 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2891759691 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2895129681 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2900896741 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2907726837 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2912395775 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2921694960 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2922317384 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2923131094 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2923521833 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2925511639 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2937097697 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2938348190 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W2939917650 @default.
• W2969774265 cites W4233108345 @default.
• W2969774265 doi "https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7306204" @default.
• W2969774265 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6719269" @default.
• W2969774265 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31531242" @default.
• W2969774265 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2969774265 type Work @default.
• W2969774265 sameAs 2969774265 @default.
• W2969774265 citedByCount "10" @default.
• W2969774265 countsByYear W29697742652020 @default.
• W2969774265 countsByYear W29697742652021 @default.
• W2969774265 countsByYear W29697742652022 @default.
• W2969774265 countsByYear W29697742652023 @default.
• W2969774265 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2969774265 hasAuthorship W2969774265A5000093563 @default.
• W2969774265 hasAuthorship W2969774265A5005992662 @default.
• W2969774265 hasAuthorship W2969774265A5006846955 @default.
• W2969774265 hasAuthorship W2969774265A5018538601 @default.
• W2969774265 hasAuthorship W2969774265A5022117993 @default.
• W2969774265 hasAuthorship W2969774265A5037881521 @default.
• W2969774265 hasAuthorship W2969774265A5084459767 @default.
• W2969774265 hasBestOaLocation W29697742651 @default.
• W2969774265 hasConcept C105922876 @default.
• W2969774265 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2969774265 hasConcept C2776410716 @default.
• W2969774265 hasConcept C2777055891 @default.
• W2969774265 hasConcept C2778029997 @default.
• W2969774265 hasConcept C2778165595 @default.
• W2969774265 hasConcept C2778716859 @default.
• W2969774265 hasConcept C2780978852 @default.
• W2969774265 hasConcept C2991710064 @default.
• W2969774265 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2969774265 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2969774265 hasConceptScore W2969774265C105922876 @default.
• W2969774265 hasConceptScore W2969774265C141071460 @default.
• W2969774265 hasConceptScore W2969774265C2776410716 @default.
• W2969774265 hasConceptScore W2969774265C2777055891 @default.
• W2969774265 hasConceptScore W2969774265C2778029997 @default.
• W2969774265 hasConceptScore W2969774265C2778165595 @default.
• W2969774265 hasConceptScore W2969774265C2778716859 @default.
• W2969774265 hasConceptScore W2969774265C2780978852 @default.
• W2969774265 hasConceptScore W2969774265C2991710064 @default.
• W2969774265 hasConceptScore W2969774265C42219234 @default.
• W2969774265 hasConceptScore W2969774265C71924100 @default.
• W2969774265 hasLocation W29697742651 @default.
• W2969774265 hasLocation W29697742652 @default.

• next