FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2969803043> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2969803043 endingPage "1129" @default.
• W2969803043 startingPage "1129" @default.
• W2969803043 abstract "<h3>Importance</h3> The availability and quality of skin and hair care for black patients in the United States has been a subject of growing interest in dermatology. There is limited understanding of the perceptions of black patients about the care they receive from dermatologists and the factors affecting their care satisfaction. <h3>Objective</h3> To elucidate black patients’ perceptions of their dermatology experience in and outside of a skin of color clinic (SOCC). <h3>Design, Setting, and Participants</h3> A cross-sectional study involving a survey and focus groups was conducted including adult black patients treated in an SOCC. Recruitment was conducted April through June 2015 through clinic-posted flyers. Participants engaged in 1 of 4 focus groups on July 14, 15, 29, or 30, 2015, and completed a survey. Data were analyzed March 2016 through June 2017. <h3>Main Outcomes and Measures</h3> Planned outcomes of the focus groups were black patients’ inductively generated themes on their perspectives and experiences in dermatology clinics. Planned outcomes of the survey were patients’ ratings of SOCC and non-SOCC dermatologists in terms of interaction style, cultural awareness, and treatment satisfaction. Importance of patient-dermatologist racial concordance was a planned outcome in both measures. Given lack of existing prior research, no specific hypotheses were generated. <h3>Results</h3> Of the 19 adult black patients who participated in the study, 18 (95%) were women, and the mean (SD) age was 50.0 (14.2) years. All patients reported positive experiences in the SOCC. Compared with non-SOCC dermatology treatment experiences, patients reported higher levels of overall satisfaction with SOCC dermatologists (<i>t</i>₁₃ = 2.85;<i>P</i> = .01). Patients perceived that SOCC dermatologists were better trained to care for black patients (<i>t</i>₁₃ = 4.42;<i>P</i> = .001); showed patients greater respect and dignity (<i>t</i>₁₃ = 3.37;<i>P</i> = .005), as well as understanding (<i>t</i>₁₃ = 2.56,<i>P</i> = .02); and were more trustworthy (<i>t</i>₁₃ = 3.47;<i>P</i> = .004). The majority of the comments in the focus groups (n = 207) described 2 themes: dermatologists’ interaction style (62/207; 30.0%) and knowledge about black skin and hair (42/207; 20.3%). Other themes were partnering with patients on outcomes (17/207; 8.2%), shared life experiences (14/207; 6.8%), and economic sensitivity (7/207; 3.4%). These themes accounted for a large part of the participants’ discussion. Of all respondents, 71% (12/17) stated that they would prefer a black (or race concordant) dermatologist; this included 91% (10/11) of the race-concordant group and 33% (2/6) of the race-discordant group. <h3>Conclusions and Relevance</h3> Participants reported that the SOCC dermatologists provided unique and uniformly beneficial care to black patients. Care satisfaction appeared most related to dermatologists’ interpersonal style and specialized knowledge in care of black skin and hair. Findings suggest that black patients’ dermatologic care satisfaction would increase if dermatologists underwent enhanced residency training in skin of color, cultural competency, cost-conscious care, and empathic communication skills, and if there were greater dermatology workforce diversity." @default.
• W2969803043 created "2019-08-29" @default.
• W2969803043 creator A5031750688 @default.
• W2969803043 creator A5039325022 @default.
• W2969803043 creator A5076576684 @default.
• W2969803043 creator A5089773533 @default.
• W2969803043 date "2019-10-01" @default.
• W2969803043 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2969803043 title "Assessment of Black Patients’ Perception of Their Dermatology Care" @default.
• W2969803043 cites W1967521864 @default.
• W2969803043 cites W1977014098 @default.
• W2969803043 cites W1981474567 @default.
• W2969803043 cites W2050864309 @default.
• W2969803043 cites W2142024599 @default.
• W2969803043 cites W2142225512 @default.
• W2969803043 cites W2180824392 @default.
• W2969803043 cites W2222980937 @default.
• W2969803043 cites W2555686871 @default.
• W2969803043 cites W2564779105 @default.
• W2969803043 cites W2568285578 @default.
• W2969803043 cites W2608939319 @default.
• W2969803043 cites W2755432226 @default.
• W2969803043 cites W2769643935 @default.
• W2969803043 cites W2796631669 @default.
• W2969803043 cites W2910067991 @default.
• W2969803043 cites W4250290986 @default.
• W2969803043 cites W4250838980 @default.
• W2969803043 doi "https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.2063" @default.
• W2969803043 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6704753" @default.
• W2969803043 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31433446" @default.
• W2969803043 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2969803043 type Work @default.
• W2969803043 sameAs 2969803043 @default.
• W2969803043 citedByCount "48" @default.
• W2969803043 countsByYear W29698030432019 @default.
• W2969803043 countsByYear W29698030432020 @default.
• W2969803043 countsByYear W29698030432021 @default.
• W2969803043 countsByYear W29698030432022 @default.
• W2969803043 countsByYear W29698030432023 @default.
• W2969803043 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2969803043 hasAuthorship W2969803043A5031750688 @default.
• W2969803043 hasAuthorship W2969803043A5039325022 @default.
• W2969803043 hasAuthorship W2969803043A5076576684 @default.
• W2969803043 hasAuthorship W2969803043A5089773533 @default.
• W2969803043 hasBestOaLocation W29698030431 @default.
• W2969803043 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2969803043 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2969803043 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2969803043 hasConcept C16005928 @default.
• W2969803043 hasConcept C160798450 @default.
• W2969803043 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2969803043 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W2969803043 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2969803043 hasConcept C56995899 @default.
• W2969803043 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2969803043 hasConceptScore W2969803043C126322002 @default.
• W2969803043 hasConceptScore W2969803043C144133560 @default.
• W2969803043 hasConceptScore W2969803043C159110408 @default.
• W2969803043 hasConceptScore W2969803043C16005928 @default.
• W2969803043 hasConceptScore W2969803043C160798450 @default.
• W2969803043 hasConceptScore W2969803043C162853370 @default.
• W2969803043 hasConceptScore W2969803043C2775944032 @default.
• W2969803043 hasConceptScore W2969803043C512399662 @default.
• W2969803043 hasConceptScore W2969803043C56995899 @default.
• W2969803043 hasConceptScore W2969803043C71924100 @default.
• W2969803043 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W2969803043 hasLocation W29698030431 @default.
• W2969803043 hasLocation W29698030432 @default.
• W2969803043 hasLocation W29698030433 @default.
• W2969803043 hasOpenAccess W2969803043 @default.
• W2969803043 hasPrimaryLocation W29698030431 @default.
• W2969803043 hasRelatedWork W1517024399 @default.
• W2969803043 hasRelatedWork W1601684588 @default.
• W2969803043 hasRelatedWork W1897313079 @default.
• W2969803043 hasRelatedWork W2060206762 @default.
• W2969803043 hasRelatedWork W2104328188 @default.
• W2969803043 hasRelatedWork W2108427450 @default.
• W2969803043 hasRelatedWork W2396330467 @default.
• W2969803043 hasRelatedWork W2915108716 @default.
• W2969803043 hasRelatedWork W4220795960 @default.
• W2969803043 hasRelatedWork W648938440 @default.
• W2969803043 hasVolume "155" @default.
• W2969803043 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2969803043 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2969803043 magId "2969803043" @default.
• W2969803043 workType "article" @default.