FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2969916006> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2969916006 abstract "As the world has become increasingly connected over the last few decades, government and public managers have had to adapt from traditional unitary, hierarchical organizations to networked, collaborative, multiorganizational arrangements (O’Leary & Vij, 2012). This changing environ ment and the continued growth of third-party governance have led to an abundance of collaborative public management scholarship (O’Leary & Vij, 2012; Thomson, Perry, & Miller, 2009). Much of this literature is by its nature multidisciplinary, vast, and highly fragmented. While the varying conceptualizations add perspective and depth to the field, this richness also makes it difficult to compare results and communicate across disciplines (Thomson et al., 2009). What this variation produces is not a simple agreed upon definition of the study of collaboration, but an array of wide-ranging theoretical perspectives, definitions, and understandings of collaborative public management (Thomson et al., 2009). Disagreements abound, from process and structure, to distinctions of organizational relationships, all of which have only served to add to the confusion and ambiguity shrouding the field (Morse & Stephens, 2012). To move forward and to build a common language across the multidisciplinary field of study, it is imperative that we heed the advice of prior work in an effort to identify and discuss the core values comprising interorganizational collaboration. This will allow us not only to better understand collaborative elements and processes, but also to gain additional insight into the critical components that help collaboratives to successfully achieve their program goals. The purpose of this chapter is twofold; first, to identify the components critical to collaboration through the literature, and second, to examine the progress made in collaboration theory-building since the Wood and Gray (1991) symposium to see if we are any closer to reaching agreement on what collaboration is. This work, through the review of the Wood and Gray (1991) symposium, and synthesis of the subsequent literature, attempts to bring some clarity to the definitional issue by exploring theprevailing elements of public-sector collaboration. It is only through definitional clarity that a theory of collaboration will emerge. The chapter begins by reviewing the definitional conundrum plaguing the theoretical development of collaboration scholarship. After discussing wicked problems and the state of the literature, we will then examine the findings of the 1991 symposium article by Wood and Gray before setting out to replicate and expand on their work. We will delineate prevailing elements of collaboration from the multidisciplinary literature, both to gain a better understanding of what makes up collaboration and also to further examine the progress made over the nearly quarter-century since Wood and Gray (1991) first set out to synthesize the literature toward a definition of collaboration. This is followed by the results of our analysis of the collaboration literature, and what amounts to the prevailing elements that make up public-sector collaboration. A summary conclusion will be offered in which the results of our analysis are contrasted with the findings of Wood and Gray (1991) in an effort to examine the progress made over the last few decades in defining and understanding collaboration. Finally, implications of the findings, particularly the framing and definitional concerns for both scholars and practitioners will be discussed as well as a call for future research." @default.
• W2969916006 created "2019-08-29" @default.
• W2969916006 creator A5005740400 @default.
• W2969916006 creator A5008250529 @default.
• W2969916006 date "2015-09-07" @default.
• W2969916006 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2969916006 title "The Prevailing Elements of Public- Sector Collaboration" @default.
• W2969916006 doi "https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315749242-13" @default.
• W2969916006 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2969916006 type Work @default.
• W2969916006 sameAs 2969916006 @default.
• W2969916006 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2969916006 countsByYear W29699160062019 @default.
• W2969916006 countsByYear W29699160062020 @default.
• W2969916006 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
• W2969916006 hasAuthorship W2969916006A5005740400 @default.
• W2969916006 hasAuthorship W2969916006A5008250529 @default.
• W2969916006 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2969916006 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2969916006 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2969916006 hasConcept C147859227 @default.
• W2969916006 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2969916006 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2969916006 hasConcept C22467394 @default.
• W2969916006 hasConcept C2778061430 @default.
• W2969916006 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W2969916006 hasConcept C2780876879 @default.
• W2969916006 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2969916006 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2969916006 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2969916006 hasConceptScore W2969916006C111472728 @default.
• W2969916006 hasConceptScore W2969916006C138885662 @default.
• W2969916006 hasConceptScore W2969916006C144024400 @default.
• W2969916006 hasConceptScore W2969916006C147859227 @default.
• W2969916006 hasConceptScore W2969916006C17744445 @default.
• W2969916006 hasConceptScore W2969916006C199539241 @default.
• W2969916006 hasConceptScore W2969916006C22467394 @default.
• W2969916006 hasConceptScore W2969916006C2778061430 @default.
• W2969916006 hasConceptScore W2969916006C2778137410 @default.
• W2969916006 hasConceptScore W2969916006C2780876879 @default.
• W2969916006 hasConceptScore W2969916006C36289849 @default.
• W2969916006 hasConceptScore W2969916006C39549134 @default.
• W2969916006 hasConceptScore W2969916006C41895202 @default.
• W2969916006 hasLocation W29699160061 @default.
• W2969916006 hasOpenAccess W2969916006 @default.
• W2969916006 hasPrimaryLocation W29699160061 @default.
• W2969916006 hasRelatedWork W1505678551 @default.
• W2969916006 hasRelatedWork W1891338973 @default.
• W2969916006 hasRelatedWork W2107306099 @default.
• W2969916006 hasRelatedWork W2113299338 @default.
• W2969916006 hasRelatedWork W2143387678 @default.
• W2969916006 hasRelatedWork W2144453145 @default.
• W2969916006 hasRelatedWork W2363571346 @default.
• W2969916006 hasRelatedWork W2600835160 @default.
• W2969916006 hasRelatedWork W2614625870 @default.
• W2969916006 hasRelatedWork W2724306165 @default.
• W2969916006 hasRelatedWork W2810933687 @default.
• W2969916006 hasRelatedWork W2947883166 @default.
• W2969916006 hasRelatedWork W2953082795 @default.
• W2969916006 hasRelatedWork W2977986389 @default.
• W2969916006 hasRelatedWork W3125841626 @default.
• W2969916006 hasRelatedWork W3183829993 @default.
• W2969916006 hasRelatedWork W561050304 @default.
• W2969916006 hasRelatedWork W2579502252 @default.
• W2969916006 hasRelatedWork W2588187555 @default.
• W2969916006 hasRelatedWork W2596254568 @default.
• W2969916006 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2969916006 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2969916006 magId "2969916006" @default.
• W2969916006 workType "book-chapter" @default.