FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2969969752> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2969969752 abstract "ABSTRACT The visual inspection of pluripotent stem cell colonies by microscopy is widely used as a primary method to assess the quality of the preparations and degree of pluripotency. The lack of ground truth and the possible inconsistency of evaluations from multiple experts within and between stem cell laboratories are sources of uncertainty about the state of the cells, the reproducibility of preparations, and the efficiency of expansion protocols. To examine how to evaluate the level of confidence one has in disparate rating from experts, we explored a statistical method for assessing the differences in ratings of pluripotent stem cells by two different experts. Two experts rated phase contrast microscope images of human embryonic stem cell (hESC) colonies on a scale of 1 (poor) to 5 (maximum pluripotency character) but agreed with one another only 48% of the time. To assess whether experts used similar criteria to rate colonies, we developed custom image feature algorithms based on the stated visual criteria provided by the experts for selection of colonies. These features, plus others, were then used to develop pluripotency scoring algorithms trained to reflect ratings of both experts. We treated expert ratings as inexact indicators of a continuous pluripotency score and considered the inconsistency between expert ratings in developing our models. The model suggests that the two experts use somewhat different scales for discriminating between colony quality. Covariance analysis indicated that both experts use features that are not included in the model. Two image features, colony perimeter and a feature based on texture, were the most important for both experts for predicting the ratings. Interestingly, colony perimeter was not one of the expert-provided criteria for rating colonies, showing that this modeling approach allowed identification of features that the experts were not aware they were using. A linear model based on both experts identified each expert’s top-rated colonies as well as, or better than, the ratings of the other expert, as indicated by receiver operator characteristic curve analysis. By providing an understanding of the differences and similarities in disparate sets of expert ratings, this analysis helps to establish confidence in the ratings and the criteria for ratings, even when the experts disagree." @default.
• W2969969752 created "2019-08-29" @default.
• W2969969752 creator A5013182443 @default.
• W2969969752 creator A5015219111 @default.
• W2969969752 creator A5015678162 @default.
• W2969969752 creator A5018315856 @default.
• W2969969752 creator A5025865534 @default.
• W2969969752 creator A5029112284 @default.
• W2969969752 creator A5032465051 @default.
• W2969969752 creator A5055872472 @default.
• W2969969752 creator A5058440761 @default.
• W2969969752 creator A5059901229 @default.
• W2969969752 creator A5086282462 @default.
• W2969969752 date "2019-08-24" @default.
• W2969969752 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2969969752 title "A Latent Variable Model for Evaluation of Disparate Ratings of Stem Cell Colonies by Two Experts" @default.
• W2969969752 cites W1969285483 @default.
• W2969969752 cites W1989174100 @default.
• W2969969752 cites W1993846072 @default.
• W2969969752 cites W2003345727 @default.
• W2969969752 cites W2040481376 @default.
• W2969969752 cites W2064642825 @default.
• W2969969752 cites W2076194888 @default.
• W2969969752 cites W2091781764 @default.
• W2969969752 cites W2097106406 @default.
• W2969969752 cites W2139186788 @default.
• W2969969752 cites W2165879419 @default.
• W2969969752 cites W2167460663 @default.
• W2969969752 cites W2525530542 @default.
• W2969969752 cites W2564704343 @default.
• W2969969752 cites W2573810887 @default.
• W2969969752 cites W2766039749 @default.
• W2969969752 cites W2777961825 @default.
• W2969969752 cites W2921173483 @default.
• W2969969752 doi "https://doi.org/10.1101/746057" @default.
• W2969969752 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2969969752 type Work @default.
• W2969969752 sameAs 2969969752 @default.
• W2969969752 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2969969752 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W2969969752 hasAuthorship W2969969752A5013182443 @default.
• W2969969752 hasAuthorship W2969969752A5015219111 @default.
• W2969969752 hasAuthorship W2969969752A5015678162 @default.
• W2969969752 hasAuthorship W2969969752A5018315856 @default.
• W2969969752 hasAuthorship W2969969752A5025865534 @default.
• W2969969752 hasAuthorship W2969969752A5029112284 @default.
• W2969969752 hasAuthorship W2969969752A5032465051 @default.
• W2969969752 hasAuthorship W2969969752A5055872472 @default.
• W2969969752 hasAuthorship W2969969752A5058440761 @default.
• W2969969752 hasAuthorship W2969969752A5059901229 @default.
• W2969969752 hasAuthorship W2969969752A5086282462 @default.
• W2969969752 hasBestOaLocation W29699697521 @default.
• W2969969752 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W2969969752 hasConcept C107459253 @default.
• W2969969752 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2969969752 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2969969752 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2969969752 hasConcept C145103041 @default.
• W2969969752 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2969969752 hasConcept C2776401178 @default.
• W2969969752 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W2969969752 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2969969752 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2969969752 hasConcept C51167844 @default.
• W2969969752 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2969969752 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2969969752 hasConceptScore W2969969752C104317684 @default.
• W2969969752 hasConceptScore W2969969752C107459253 @default.
• W2969969752 hasConceptScore W2969969752C111472728 @default.
• W2969969752 hasConceptScore W2969969752C119857082 @default.
• W2969969752 hasConceptScore W2969969752C138885662 @default.
• W2969969752 hasConceptScore W2969969752C145103041 @default.
• W2969969752 hasConceptScore W2969969752C154945302 @default.
• W2969969752 hasConceptScore W2969969752C2776401178 @default.
• W2969969752 hasConceptScore W2969969752C2779530757 @default.
• W2969969752 hasConceptScore W2969969752C41008148 @default.
• W2969969752 hasConceptScore W2969969752C41895202 @default.
• W2969969752 hasConceptScore W2969969752C51167844 @default.
• W2969969752 hasConceptScore W2969969752C55493867 @default.
• W2969969752 hasConceptScore W2969969752C86803240 @default.
• W2969969752 hasLocation W29699697521 @default.
• W2969969752 hasOpenAccess W2969969752 @default.
• W2969969752 hasPrimaryLocation W29699697521 @default.
• W2969969752 hasRelatedWork W2006140228 @default.
• W2969969752 hasRelatedWork W2036712569 @default.
• W2969969752 hasRelatedWork W2083644037 @default.
• W2969969752 hasRelatedWork W2091762887 @default.
• W2969969752 hasRelatedWork W2140991980 @default.
• W2969969752 hasRelatedWork W2340876778 @default.
• W2969969752 hasRelatedWork W2562524806 @default.
• W2969969752 hasRelatedWork W2962677662 @default.
• W2969969752 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2969969752 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2969969752 magId "2969969752" @default.
• W2969969752 workType "article" @default.