FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2970437062> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2970437062 endingPage "212" @default.
• W2970437062 startingPage "207" @default.
• W2970437062 abstract "Objective: The King-Devick (K-D) test is a rapid visual screening tool that can assess underlying brain trauma such as concussion via impairments in saccadic rhythm. A new tablet version of the K-D test using randomized numbers is now available, but reliability for this new version and comparison to the traditional K-D test has not yet been reported. Known for learning effects in the test, the aim of this study was to determine test–retest reliability and to compare performance of the new “randomized” version to the “traditional” K-D test version. We hypothesized that the “traditional” K-D test would show a greater rate of improvement with repeat application, compared with the “randomized” K-D test. Methods: Using a cross-sectional, repeated measures design in a healthy university student cohort (n = 96; age 21.6 ± 2.8 years; 49 women, 47 men), participants were required to complete the K-D test twice with a one-week break between testing sessions. Participants were randomly assigned into a “traditional” group, where they completed a test–retest of the established K-D protocol, using the same numbers; or the “randomized” group, where they completed test–retest protocol using 2 different sets of numbers. Results: Reliability testing showed a strong intraclass correlation coefficient for both the “traditional” test group (control group; 0.95 [CI: 0.91–0.97]) and the “randomized test group” (0.97 [CI: 0.95–0.98]). However, contrary to our hypothesis, no differences were found between “traditional” and “randomized” groups for baseline (control: 42.5 seconds [CI: 40.2–44.9 s] vs randomized: 41.5 [38.7–44.4], P = 0.23) and repeated testing between groups (control: 40.0 seconds [37.9–42.1 s] vs randomized: 39.5 [36.9–42.0], P = 0.55), with both groups showing improved times with repeated testing (control: 2.1 seconds [CI: 1.1–3.2 seconds] and randomized: 1.9 seconds CI: [0.9–2.9 seconds], P < 0.001). Conclusions: The “randomized” version of the K-D test, using different sets of numbers, demonstrates good reliability that is comparable to the traditional K-D testing protocol that uses the same number sets. However, similar to the “traditional” K-D test, learning effects were also observed in the “randomized” test, suggesting that learning effects are not because of content memorization, but rather familiarity of the test. As a result, although either test format is suitable for sideline concussion screening or return to play decisions, comparison of data should be made to the individual's baseline rather than to normative data sets." @default.
• W2970437062 created "2019-09-05" @default.
• W2970437062 creator A5025477547 @default.
• W2970437062 creator A5026624586 @default.
• W2970437062 creator A5090109555 @default.
• W2970437062 date "2020-06-01" @default.
• W2970437062 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2970437062 title "A Reliability and Comparative Analysis of the New Randomized King-Devick Test" @default.
• W2970437062 cites W1509343507 @default.
• W2970437062 cites W1523431227 @default.
• W2970437062 cites W1865425896 @default.
• W2970437062 cites W1964619094 @default.
• W2970437062 cites W1984026270 @default.
• W2970437062 cites W1987764148 @default.
• W2970437062 cites W1995882573 @default.
• W2970437062 cites W2020092396 @default.
• W2970437062 cites W2023972254 @default.
• W2970437062 cites W2028796977 @default.
• W2970437062 cites W2043926886 @default.
• W2970437062 cites W2062306902 @default.
• W2970437062 cites W2063829932 @default.
• W2970437062 cites W2075238622 @default.
• W2970437062 cites W2087484885 @default.
• W2970437062 cites W2095432656 @default.
• W2970437062 cites W2095901995 @default.
• W2970437062 cites W2108365791 @default.
• W2970437062 cites W2123476869 @default.
• W2970437062 cites W2126078429 @default.
• W2970437062 cites W2132412028 @default.
• W2970437062 cites W2140229284 @default.
• W2970437062 cites W2145937892 @default.
• W2970437062 cites W2301588634 @default.
• W2970437062 cites W2329720830 @default.
• W2970437062 cites W2795216743 @default.
• W2970437062 cites W2325735618 @default.
• W2970437062 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/wno.0000000000000829" @default.
• W2970437062 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31453920" @default.
• W2970437062 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W2970437062 type Work @default.
• W2970437062 sameAs 2970437062 @default.
• W2970437062 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2970437062 countsByYear W29704370622019 @default.
• W2970437062 countsByYear W29704370622020 @default.
• W2970437062 countsByYear W29704370622021 @default.
• W2970437062 countsByYear W29704370622022 @default.
• W2970437062 countsByYear W29704370622023 @default.
• W2970437062 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2970437062 hasAuthorship W2970437062A5025477547 @default.
• W2970437062 hasAuthorship W2970437062A5026624586 @default.
• W2970437062 hasAuthorship W2970437062A5090109555 @default.
• W2970437062 hasBestOaLocation W29704370621 @default.
• W2970437062 hasConcept C104709138 @default.
• W2970437062 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2970437062 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2970437062 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2970437062 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2970437062 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W2970437062 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2970437062 hasConcept C190385971 @default.
• W2970437062 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W2970437062 hasConcept C2778426673 @default.
• W2970437062 hasConcept C3017944768 @default.
• W2970437062 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2970437062 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2970437062 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2970437062 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2970437062 hasConceptScore W2970437062C104709138 @default.
• W2970437062 hasConceptScore W2970437062C126322002 @default.
• W2970437062 hasConceptScore W2970437062C151730666 @default.
• W2970437062 hasConceptScore W2970437062C15744967 @default.
• W2970437062 hasConceptScore W2970437062C168563851 @default.
• W2970437062 hasConceptScore W2970437062C171606756 @default.
• W2970437062 hasConceptScore W2970437062C1862650 @default.
• W2970437062 hasConceptScore W2970437062C190385971 @default.
• W2970437062 hasConceptScore W2970437062C2777267654 @default.
• W2970437062 hasConceptScore W2970437062C2778426673 @default.
• W2970437062 hasConceptScore W2970437062C3017944768 @default.
• W2970437062 hasConceptScore W2970437062C70410870 @default.
• W2970437062 hasConceptScore W2970437062C71924100 @default.
• W2970437062 hasConceptScore W2970437062C86803240 @default.
• W2970437062 hasConceptScore W2970437062C99454951 @default.
• W2970437062 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2970437062 hasLocation W29704370621 @default.
• W2970437062 hasLocation W29704370622 @default.
• W2970437062 hasOpenAccess W2970437062 @default.
• W2970437062 hasPrimaryLocation W29704370621 @default.
• W2970437062 hasRelatedWork W1593708541 @default.
• W2970437062 hasRelatedWork W1791960638 @default.
• W2970437062 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2970437062 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2970437062 hasRelatedWork W3159250744 @default.
• W2970437062 hasRelatedWork W4226167060 @default.
• W2970437062 hasRelatedWork W4254174519 @default.
• W2970437062 hasRelatedWork W4256514411 @default.
• W2970437062 hasRelatedWork W4292236216 @default.
• W2970437062 hasRelatedWork W2083697902 @default.
• W2970437062 hasVolume "40" @default.
• W2970437062 isParatext "false" @default.

• next