FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2972436443> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2972436443 endingPage "1007" @default.
• W2972436443 startingPage "999" @default.
• W2972436443 abstract "Purpose Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) historically has been used to treat multiple brain lesions using a multiple-isocenter technique—frequently associated with significant complexity in treatment planning and long treatment times. Recently, given innovations in planning algorithms, patients with multiple brain lesions may now be treated with a single-isocenter technique using fewer total arcs and less time spent during image guidance (though with stricter image guided radiation therapy tolerances). This study used time-driven activity-based costing to determine the difference in cost to a provider for delivering SRS to multiple brain lesions using single-isocenter versus multiple-isocenter techniques. Methods and Materials Process maps, consisting of discrete steps, were created for each phase of the SRS care cycle and were based on interviews with department personnel. Actual treatment times (including image guidance) were extracted from treatment record and verify software. Additional sources of data to determine costs included salary/benefit data of personnel and average list price/maintenance costs for equipment. Results Data were collected for 22 patients who underwent single-isocenter SRS (mean lesions treated, 5.2; mean treatment time, 30.2 minutes) and 51 patients who underwent multiple-isocenter SRS (mean lesions treated, 4.4; mean treatment time, 75.2 minutes). Treatment time for multiple-isocenter SRS varied substantially with increasing number of lesions (11.8 minutes/lesion; P < .001), but to a much lesser degree in single-isocenter SRS (1.8 minutes/lesion; P = .029). The resulting cost savings from single-isocenter SRS based on number of lesions treated ranged from $296 to $3878 for 2 to 10 lesions treated. The 2-mm planning treatment volume margin used with single-isocenter SRS resulted in a mean 43% increase of total volume treated compared with a 1-mm planning treatment volume expansion. Conclusions In a comparison of time-driven activity-based costing assessment of single-isocenter versus multiple-isocenter SRS for multiple brain lesions, single-isocenter SRS appears to save time and resources for as few as 2 lesions, with incremental benefits for additional lesions treated. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) historically has been used to treat multiple brain lesions using a multiple-isocenter technique—frequently associated with significant complexity in treatment planning and long treatment times. Recently, given innovations in planning algorithms, patients with multiple brain lesions may now be treated with a single-isocenter technique using fewer total arcs and less time spent during image guidance (though with stricter image guided radiation therapy tolerances). This study used time-driven activity-based costing to determine the difference in cost to a provider for delivering SRS to multiple brain lesions using single-isocenter versus multiple-isocenter techniques. Process maps, consisting of discrete steps, were created for each phase of the SRS care cycle and were based on interviews with department personnel. Actual treatment times (including image guidance) were extracted from treatment record and verify software. Additional sources of data to determine costs included salary/benefit data of personnel and average list price/maintenance costs for equipment. Data were collected for 22 patients who underwent single-isocenter SRS (mean lesions treated, 5.2; mean treatment time, 30.2 minutes) and 51 patients who underwent multiple-isocenter SRS (mean lesions treated, 4.4; mean treatment time, 75.2 minutes). Treatment time for multiple-isocenter SRS varied substantially with increasing number of lesions (11.8 minutes/lesion; P < .001), but to a much lesser degree in single-isocenter SRS (1.8 minutes/lesion; P = .029). The resulting cost savings from single-isocenter SRS based on number of lesions treated ranged from $296 to $3878 for 2 to 10 lesions treated. The 2-mm planning treatment volume margin used with single-isocenter SRS resulted in a mean 43% increase of total volume treated compared with a 1-mm planning treatment volume expansion. In a comparison of time-driven activity-based costing assessment of single-isocenter versus multiple-isocenter SRS for multiple brain lesions, single-isocenter SRS appears to save time and resources for as few as 2 lesions, with incremental benefits for additional lesions treated." @default.
• W2972436443 created "2019-09-19" @default.
• W2972436443 creator A5016822675 @default.
• W2972436443 creator A5020980740 @default.
• W2972436443 creator A5021659423 @default.
• W2972436443 creator A5030842566 @default.
• W2972436443 creator A5064969499 @default.
• W2972436443 creator A5075740763 @default.
• W2972436443 creator A5077701517 @default.
• W2972436443 creator A5079907888 @default.
• W2972436443 creator A5088927067 @default.
• W2972436443 date "2020-11-01" @default.
• W2972436443 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2972436443 title "Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Comparison of Stereotactic Radiosurgery to Multiple Brain Lesions Using Single-Isocenter Versus Multiple-Isocenter Technique" @default.
• W2972436443 cites W1945455116 @default.
• W2972436443 cites W2080507441 @default.
• W2972436443 cites W2093385838 @default.
• W2972436443 cites W2098256073 @default.
• W2972436443 cites W2106598609 @default.
• W2972436443 cites W2519619073 @default.
• W2972436443 cites W2560705477 @default.
• W2972436443 cites W2586657640 @default.
• W2972436443 cites W2605112441 @default.
• W2972436443 cites W2619087376 @default.
• W2972436443 cites W2772454194 @default.
• W2972436443 cites W2793899998 @default.
• W2972436443 cites W2799670684 @default.
• W2972436443 cites W2799677922 @default.
• W2972436443 cites W2800800745 @default.
• W2972436443 cites W2888253752 @default.
• W2972436443 cites W2899126644 @default.
• W2972436443 cites W2973029052 @default.
• W2972436443 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.06.035" @default.
• W2972436443 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32603774" @default.
• W2972436443 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W2972436443 type Work @default.
• W2972436443 sameAs 2972436443 @default.
• W2972436443 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2972436443 countsByYear W29724364432021 @default.
• W2972436443 countsByYear W29724364432022 @default.
• W2972436443 countsByYear W29724364432023 @default.
• W2972436443 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2972436443 hasAuthorship W2972436443A5016822675 @default.
• W2972436443 hasAuthorship W2972436443A5020980740 @default.
• W2972436443 hasAuthorship W2972436443A5021659423 @default.
• W2972436443 hasAuthorship W2972436443A5030842566 @default.
• W2972436443 hasAuthorship W2972436443A5064969499 @default.
• W2972436443 hasAuthorship W2972436443A5075740763 @default.
• W2972436443 hasAuthorship W2972436443A5077701517 @default.
• W2972436443 hasAuthorship W2972436443A5079907888 @default.
• W2972436443 hasAuthorship W2972436443A5088927067 @default.
• W2972436443 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2972436443 hasConcept C181401712 @default.
• W2972436443 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2972436443 hasConcept C201645570 @default.
• W2972436443 hasConcept C2780387249 @default.
• W2972436443 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2972436443 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W2972436443 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2972436443 hasConceptScore W2972436443C126838900 @default.
• W2972436443 hasConceptScore W2972436443C181401712 @default.
• W2972436443 hasConceptScore W2972436443C19527891 @default.
• W2972436443 hasConceptScore W2972436443C201645570 @default.
• W2972436443 hasConceptScore W2972436443C2780387249 @default.
• W2972436443 hasConceptScore W2972436443C2989005 @default.
• W2972436443 hasConceptScore W2972436443C509974204 @default.
• W2972436443 hasConceptScore W2972436443C71924100 @default.
• W2972436443 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2972436443 hasLocation W29724364431 @default.
• W2972436443 hasOpenAccess W2972436443 @default.
• W2972436443 hasPrimaryLocation W29724364431 @default.
• W2972436443 hasRelatedWork W1602261451 @default.
• W2972436443 hasRelatedWork W1980114307 @default.
• W2972436443 hasRelatedWork W2003305474 @default.
• W2972436443 hasRelatedWork W2031643092 @default.
• W2972436443 hasRelatedWork W2041795146 @default.
• W2972436443 hasRelatedWork W2150420705 @default.
• W2972436443 hasRelatedWork W2354985064 @default.
• W2972436443 hasRelatedWork W2355353733 @default.
• W2972436443 hasRelatedWork W2412275291 @default.
• W2972436443 hasRelatedWork W2460741112 @default.
• W2972436443 hasVolume "108" @default.
• W2972436443 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2972436443 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2972436443 magId "2972436443" @default.
• W2972436443 workType "article" @default.