FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2972653961> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2972653961 endingPage "1436" @default.
• W2972653961 startingPage "1425" @default.
• W2972653961 abstract "BackgroundHeavy menstrual bleeding affects 25% of women in the UK, many of whom require surgery to treat it. Hysterectomy is effective but has more complications than endometrial ablation, which is less invasive but ultimately leads to hysterectomy in 20% of women. We compared laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with endometrial ablation in women seeking surgical treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding.MethodsIn this parallel-group, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial in 31 hospitals in the UK, women younger than 50 years who were referred to a gynaecologist for surgical treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding and who were eligible for endometrial ablation were randomly allocated (1:1) to either laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy or second generation endometrial ablation. Women were randomly assigned by either an interactive voice response telephone system or an internet-based application with a minimisation algorithm based on centre and age group (<40 years vs ≥40 years). Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy involves laparoscopic (keyhole) surgery to remove the upper part of the uterus (the body) containing the endometrium. Endometrial ablation aims to treat heavy menstrual bleeding by destroying the endometrium, which is responsible for heavy periods. The co-primary clinical outcomes were patient satisfaction and condition-specific quality of life, measured with the menorrhagia multi-attribute quality of life scale (MMAS), assessed at 15 months after randomisation. Our analysis was based on the intention-to-treat principle. The trial was registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN49013893.FindingsBetween May 21, 2014, and March 28, 2017, we enrolled and randomly assigned 660 women (330 in each group). 616 (93%) of 660 women were operated on within the study period, 588 (95%) of whom received the allocated procedure and 28 (5%) of whom had an alternative surgery. At 15 months after randomisation, more women allocated to laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy were satisfied with their operation compared with those in the endometrial ablation group (270 [97%] of 278 women vs 244 [87%] of 280 women; adjusted percentage difference 9·8, 95% CI 5·1–14·5; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2·53, 95% CI 1·83–3·48; p<0·0001). Women randomly assigned to laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy were also more likely to have the best possible MMAS score of 100 than women assigned to endometrial ablation (180 [69%] of 262 women vs 146 [54%] of 268 women; adjusted percentage difference 13·3, 95% CI 3·8–22·8; adjusted OR 1·87, 95% CI 1·31–2·67; p=0·00058). 14 (5%) of 309 women in the laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy group and 11 (4%) of 307 women in the endometrial ablation group had at least one serious adverse event (adjusted OR 1·30, 95% CI 0·56–3·02; p=0·54).InterpretationLaparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy is superior to endometrial ablation in terms of clinical effectiveness and has a similar proportion of complications, but takes longer to perform and is associated with a longer recovery.FundingUK National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme." @default.
• W2972653961 created "2019-09-19" @default.
• W2972653961 creator A5001545001 @default.
• W2972653961 creator A5003511270 @default.
• W2972653961 creator A5004165162 @default.
• W2972653961 creator A5007314092 @default.
• W2972653961 creator A5014334391 @default.
• W2972653961 creator A5026201989 @default.
• W2972653961 creator A5034149011 @default.
• W2972653961 creator A5037236890 @default.
• W2972653961 creator A5052750790 @default.
• W2972653961 creator A5056062193 @default.
• W2972653961 creator A5061293925 @default.
• W2972653961 creator A5061749118 @default.
• W2972653961 creator A5063110607 @default.
• W2972653961 creator A5090433417 @default.
• W2972653961 date "2019-10-01" @default.
• W2972653961 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2972653961 title "Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus endometrial ablation for women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HEALTH): a parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled trial" @default.
• W2972653961 cites W1545772217 @default.
• W2972653961 cites W1624155247 @default.
• W2972653961 cites W1847895204 @default.
• W2972653961 cites W1932709689 @default.
• W2972653961 cites W1969128901 @default.
• W2972653961 cites W1983061396 @default.
• W2972653961 cites W1991634895 @default.
• W2972653961 cites W1993790913 @default.
• W2972653961 cites W2002216387 @default.
• W2972653961 cites W2011684165 @default.
• W2972653961 cites W2013216006 @default.
• W2972653961 cites W2030098243 @default.
• W2972653961 cites W2054779191 @default.
• W2972653961 cites W2094663461 @default.
• W2972653961 cites W2108080908 @default.
• W2972653961 cites W2132061576 @default.
• W2972653961 cites W2139381326 @default.
• W2972653961 cites W2151364172 @default.
• W2972653961 cites W2155859928 @default.
• W2972653961 cites W2156504049 @default.
• W2972653961 cites W2163213475 @default.
• W2972653961 cites W2433330896 @default.
• W2972653961 cites W2553691126 @default.
• W2972653961 cites W2786805275 @default.
• W2972653961 cites W2904172738 @default.
• W2972653961 cites W290529700 @default.
• W2972653961 cites W3206649127 @default.
• W2972653961 cites W4236594144 @default.
• W2972653961 cites W4248575753 @default.
• W2972653961 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31790-8" @default.
• W2972653961 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6891255" @default.
• W2972653961 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31522846" @default.
• W2972653961 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2972653961 type Work @default.
• W2972653961 sameAs 2972653961 @default.
• W2972653961 citedByCount "27" @default.
• W2972653961 countsByYear W29726539612019 @default.
• W2972653961 countsByYear W29726539612020 @default.
• W2972653961 countsByYear W29726539612021 @default.
• W2972653961 countsByYear W29726539612022 @default.
• W2972653961 countsByYear W29726539612023 @default.
• W2972653961 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2972653961 hasAuthorship W2972653961A5001545001 @default.
• W2972653961 hasAuthorship W2972653961A5003511270 @default.
• W2972653961 hasAuthorship W2972653961A5004165162 @default.
• W2972653961 hasAuthorship W2972653961A5007314092 @default.
• W2972653961 hasAuthorship W2972653961A5014334391 @default.
• W2972653961 hasAuthorship W2972653961A5026201989 @default.
• W2972653961 hasAuthorship W2972653961A5034149011 @default.
• W2972653961 hasAuthorship W2972653961A5037236890 @default.
• W2972653961 hasAuthorship W2972653961A5052750790 @default.
• W2972653961 hasAuthorship W2972653961A5056062193 @default.
• W2972653961 hasAuthorship W2972653961A5061293925 @default.
• W2972653961 hasAuthorship W2972653961A5061749118 @default.
• W2972653961 hasAuthorship W2972653961A5063110607 @default.
• W2972653961 hasAuthorship W2972653961A5090433417 @default.
• W2972653961 hasBestOaLocation W29726539611 @default.
• W2972653961 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W2972653961 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2972653961 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2972653961 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2972653961 hasConcept C2778937548 @default.
• W2972653961 hasConcept C2779494336 @default.
• W2972653961 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
• W2972653961 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W2972653961 hasConcept C2992922752 @default.
• W2972653961 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2972653961 hasConceptScore W2972653961C131872663 @default.
• W2972653961 hasConceptScore W2972653961C141071460 @default.
• W2972653961 hasConceptScore W2972653961C159110408 @default.
• W2972653961 hasConceptScore W2972653961C168563851 @default.
• W2972653961 hasConceptScore W2972653961C2778937548 @default.
• W2972653961 hasConceptScore W2972653961C2779494336 @default.
• W2972653961 hasConceptScore W2972653961C2779951463 @default.
• W2972653961 hasConceptScore W2972653961C29456083 @default.
• W2972653961 hasConceptScore W2972653961C2992922752 @default.
• W2972653961 hasConceptScore W2972653961C71924100 @default.
• W2972653961 hasIssue "10207" @default.
• W2972653961 hasLocation W29726539611 @default.

• next