FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2973335386> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2973335386 abstract "Objectives. After world war two, many new working time schedules emerged in western countries. We studied the backgrounds of companies using two of them (annualized working time hours and on call work) and compared these with organizations applying classical shift work. Method. Every two years the Dutch OSA Institute of Labor Studies carries out a survey among a stratified sample of Dutch companies with at least 5 employees. In 2001 a net sample of 3199 companies was investigated by means of an oral interview. Nineteen background characteristics were selected for further analysis. Results were analyzed by means of logistic regression. Results Shift work is used in about 30% of all Dutch companies. We confirmed the hypothesis that shift work is applied in large and economically stable organizations (1.99 times more often in organizations of 100 or more employees; 0.57 less often in organizations with a co-working owner; 0. 77 less often in organizations with increasing costs), with stably contracted personnel (1.37 more often shortness of personnel} and a stable market share (0.75 less often in organizations that operate in a strongly competitive sales market). A system of annualized working time hours is used in 18.6% of all Dutch organizations. We confirmed that this working time method is applied by stable organizations with stably contracted personnel that operate in a cyclic but in the long term slowly changing sales market (1.85 times more often seasonal market cycles; 1.67 more often changes in organization volume). They cope with the temporary use of new personnel by attraction of temporary employment agency personnel (1.56). On call work is applied in 23.1 % of all Dutch organizations. These mostly small organizations (1.55 more often in organizations of 10-49 employees) operate in competitive and short term unstable sales markets (1.52 more often). The do not face shortness of personnel (0.52 times less often), have a high percentage of contracted personnel (1.82 more often}, and hire more often temporary agency office workers (1.71 ). They face strong increases in production costs (2.22 more often) in the nearby future. Conclusions. 2001 was an economically favorable year with only a beginning of decline. Results may be colored by a relatively large need of companies for having more qualified personnel, but also by care to cut labor investments. Applying working time strategies may be a question of a more complex choice system, compared to the nineteen variables we analyzed. At the same many working time strategies are applied in Dutch companies, so that it is likely that we did not analyze the entire picture." @default.
• W2973335386 created "2019-09-26" @default.
• W2973335386 creator A5045676158 @default.
• W2973335386 creator A5069142178 @default.
• W2973335386 date "2005-01-01" @default.
• W2973335386 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2973335386 title "Characteristics of companies using new working time schedules: Balancing Interest 17th International Symposium on Shiftwork and Working Time, 18-22 September 2005, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands: program and abstracts" @default.
• W2973335386 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2973335386 type Work @default.
• W2973335386 sameAs 2973335386 @default.
• W2973335386 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2973335386 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2973335386 hasAuthorship W2973335386A5045676158 @default.
• W2973335386 hasAuthorship W2973335386A5069142178 @default.
• W2973335386 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2973335386 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2973335386 hasConcept C16051113 @default.
• W2973335386 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2973335386 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2973335386 hasConcept C18762648 @default.
• W2973335386 hasConcept C198531522 @default.
• W2973335386 hasConcept C2777877159 @default.
• W2973335386 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W2973335386 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2973335386 hasConceptScore W2973335386C127413603 @default.
• W2973335386 hasConceptScore W2973335386C144133560 @default.
• W2973335386 hasConceptScore W2973335386C16051113 @default.
• W2973335386 hasConceptScore W2973335386C162853370 @default.
• W2973335386 hasConceptScore W2973335386C185592680 @default.
• W2973335386 hasConceptScore W2973335386C18762648 @default.
• W2973335386 hasConceptScore W2973335386C198531522 @default.
• W2973335386 hasConceptScore W2973335386C2777877159 @default.
• W2973335386 hasConceptScore W2973335386C43617362 @default.
• W2973335386 hasConceptScore W2973335386C78519656 @default.
• W2973335386 hasLocation W29733353861 @default.
• W2973335386 hasOpenAccess W2973335386 @default.
• W2973335386 hasPrimaryLocation W29733353861 @default.
• W2973335386 hasRelatedWork W108028628 @default.
• W2973335386 hasRelatedWork W1483712445 @default.
• W2973335386 hasRelatedWork W1527469375 @default.
• W2973335386 hasRelatedWork W1540407222 @default.
• W2973335386 hasRelatedWork W1962403078 @default.
• W2973335386 hasRelatedWork W2096319203 @default.
• W2973335386 hasRelatedWork W2175407186 @default.
• W2973335386 hasRelatedWork W2185966835 @default.
• W2973335386 hasRelatedWork W2297608505 @default.
• W2973335386 hasRelatedWork W244800610 @default.
• W2973335386 hasRelatedWork W2488528265 @default.
• W2973335386 hasRelatedWork W261089426 @default.
• W2973335386 hasRelatedWork W2615915584 @default.
• W2973335386 hasRelatedWork W2982480802 @default.
• W2973335386 hasRelatedWork W311119769 @default.
• W2973335386 hasRelatedWork W45314904 @default.
• W2973335386 hasRelatedWork W54388590 @default.
• W2973335386 hasRelatedWork W748261286 @default.
• W2973335386 hasRelatedWork W1928044631 @default.
• W2973335386 hasRelatedWork W3017319856 @default.
• W2973335386 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2973335386 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2973335386 magId "2973335386" @default.
• W2973335386 workType "article" @default.