FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2974156946> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2974156946 endingPage "208" @default.
• W2974156946 startingPage "208" @default.
• W2974156946 abstract "Traditional clinical examination is perceived to be biased and to overcome this, objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) was introduced.The aim was to assess the students' exposure and perception of OSCE as well as its strengths and weaknesses in comparison to conventional clinical examination.A cross-sectional study of students who had surgical OSCE was conducted from July 2018 to October 2018 in Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria. Using a structured questionnaire, exposure and perception of OSCE as well its strength and weaknesses in comparison to the conventional clinical examination were assessed with dichotomous questions and a 5-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed with SPSS Version 20.One hundred and thirty-four students responded, mean aged 24.1 ± 4.3 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 2.5:1. Although 64.7% of them strongly agreed that OSCE is the standard mode of examination, only 36.1% strongly agreed that it was easier to pass. More than half of the students perceived that the content of the OSCE was appropriate, wide-scoped, unbiased, and brought out specific areas of weakness. Some students (38.1%), however, felt that there was a need for improvement in the OSCE process, especially in time allocation, but most of them (89.5%) prefer it and agree that it was superior to conventional clinical examination.The perception of the process and structure of OSCE among the medical students was good. Compared to conventional clinical examination, students found OSCE was easier and fairer, had a better examination of structure and level of coordination, and induced lesser anxiety and fatigue. However, the entire process of OSCE can be improved." @default.
• W2974156946 created "2019-09-26" @default.
• W2974156946 creator A5017943837 @default.
• W2974156946 creator A5023567506 @default.
• W2974156946 creator A5024502726 @default.
• W2974156946 creator A5059360579 @default.
• W2974156946 date "2019-01-01" @default.
• W2974156946 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W2974156946 title "Clinical examination among medical students: Assessment and comparison of the strengths and weaknesses of objective structured clinical examination and conventional examination" @default.
• W2974156946 cites W2057102530 @default.
• W2974156946 cites W2070214922 @default.
• W2974156946 cites W2155736799 @default.
• W2974156946 cites W2473559509 @default.
• W2974156946 cites W2491124039 @default.
• W2974156946 cites W2768152859 @default.
• W2974156946 doi "https://doi.org/10.4103/njs.njs_16_19" @default.
• W2974156946 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6771188" @default.
• W2974156946 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31579379" @default.
• W2974156946 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2974156946 type Work @default.
• W2974156946 sameAs 2974156946 @default.
• W2974156946 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2974156946 countsByYear W29741569462023 @default.
• W2974156946 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2974156946 hasAuthorship W2974156946A5017943837 @default.
• W2974156946 hasAuthorship W2974156946A5023567506 @default.
• W2974156946 hasAuthorship W2974156946A5024502726 @default.
• W2974156946 hasAuthorship W2974156946A5059360579 @default.
• W2974156946 hasBestOaLocation W29741569461 @default.
• W2974156946 hasConcept C105776082 @default.
• W2974156946 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W2974156946 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2974156946 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2974156946 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2974156946 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W2974156946 hasConcept C2778000598 @default.
• W2974156946 hasConcept C2780541860 @default.
• W2974156946 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2974156946 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2974156946 hasConcept C527108885 @default.
• W2974156946 hasConcept C63882131 @default.
• W2974156946 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2974156946 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2974156946 hasConceptScore W2974156946C105776082 @default.
• W2974156946 hasConceptScore W2974156946C138496976 @default.
• W2974156946 hasConceptScore W2974156946C141071460 @default.
• W2974156946 hasConceptScore W2974156946C15744967 @default.
• W2974156946 hasConceptScore W2974156946C169760540 @default.
• W2974156946 hasConceptScore W2974156946C26760741 @default.
• W2974156946 hasConceptScore W2974156946C2778000598 @default.
• W2974156946 hasConceptScore W2974156946C2780541860 @default.
• W2974156946 hasConceptScore W2974156946C509550671 @default.
• W2974156946 hasConceptScore W2974156946C512399662 @default.
• W2974156946 hasConceptScore W2974156946C527108885 @default.
• W2974156946 hasConceptScore W2974156946C63882131 @default.
• W2974156946 hasConceptScore W2974156946C71924100 @default.
• W2974156946 hasConceptScore W2974156946C77805123 @default.
• W2974156946 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2974156946 hasLocation W29741569461 @default.
• W2974156946 hasLocation W29741569462 @default.
• W2974156946 hasLocation W29741569463 @default.
• W2974156946 hasLocation W29741569464 @default.
• W2974156946 hasLocation W29741569465 @default.
• W2974156946 hasOpenAccess W2974156946 @default.
• W2974156946 hasPrimaryLocation W29741569461 @default.
• W2974156946 hasRelatedWork W2059858388 @default.
• W2974156946 hasRelatedWork W2103745921 @default.
• W2974156946 hasRelatedWork W2351082754 @default.
• W2974156946 hasRelatedWork W2373377397 @default.
• W2974156946 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2974156946 hasRelatedWork W2974156946 @default.
• W2974156946 hasRelatedWork W2981861109 @default.
• W2974156946 hasRelatedWork W3028766794 @default.
• W2974156946 hasRelatedWork W3031609391 @default.
• W2974156946 hasRelatedWork W3031991241 @default.
• W2974156946 hasVolume "25" @default.
• W2974156946 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2974156946 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2974156946 magId "2974156946" @default.
• W2974156946 workType "article" @default.