FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2975074744> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2975074744 endingPage "2025" @default.
• W2975074744 startingPage "2025" @default.
• W2975074744 abstract "The delimitation of three land management red lines (LMRLs), which refers to urban growth boundaries (UGBs), ecological protection redlines (EPRs), and basic farmland protection zones (BFPZs), has been regarded as a control method for promoting sustainable urban development in China. However, in many Chinese cities, conflicts extensively exist among the three LMRLs in terms of spatial partitioning. This study clarifies the connotation of conflicts among the three LMRLs. Moreover, a red line conflict index (RLCI) is established to characterize the intensity of conflicts among the three LMRLs. The Wuhan Urban Development Area (WUDA) is used for a case study, in which the spatial patterns of the three types of conflicts among the three LMRLs (i.e., conflicts between EPRs and BFPZs, EPRs and UGBs, and UGBs and BFPZs) are analyzed through numerous spatial statistical analysis methods (including spatial autocorrelation, urban-rural gradient, and landscape pattern analyses). In addition, the driving forces of these conflicts are identified from the perspectives of natural physics, socioeconomic development, neighborhood, policy and planning using three binary logistic regression models. Results show that the conflicts between EPRs and BFPZs, EPRs and UGBs, and UGBs and BFPZs are mainly distributed on the edge of the WUDA, inside Wuhan’s third circulation line, and at the urban–rural transition zone, respectively. The patch of conflict between BFPZs and UGBs has the lowest aggregation degree, the highest fragmentation degree, and the most complex shape. Logistic regression results show that the combination and relative importance of driving factors vary in the three types of conflicts among the three LMRLs. In the conflict between EPRs and BFPZs, the distance to city centers is the most important influencing factor, followed by the proportion of ecological land and elevation. In the conflict between UGBs and EPRs, the proportion of construction land, the distance to city centers, and whether the land unit is within the scope of a restricted development zone are the three most important factors. The proportion of construction land, the distances to the Yangtze and Han Rivers, and the proportion of cultivated land significantly influence the conflict between UGBs and BFPZs. This study aids in our understanding of the causes and mechanisms of conflicts among the three LMRLs, and provides important information for the “integration of multi-planning” and land management in Wuhan and similar cities." @default.
• W2975074744 created "2019-10-03" @default.
• W2975074744 creator A5014756325 @default.
• W2975074744 creator A5019424035 @default.
• W2975074744 creator A5022802322 @default.
• W2975074744 creator A5026372103 @default.
• W2975074744 creator A5038623685 @default.
• W2975074744 creator A5068777328 @default.
• W2975074744 creator A5069050975 @default.
• W2975074744 creator A5077747219 @default.
• W2975074744 creator A5078233398 @default.
• W2975074744 date "2019-04-05" @default.
• W2975074744 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W2975074744 title "Spatial Patterns and Driving Forces of Conflicts among the Three Land Management Red Lines in China: A Case Study of the Wuhan Urban Development Area" @default.
• W2975074744 cites W1032334886 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W1598440992 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W1689730350 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W1779578809 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W1951846310 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W1967137980 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W1974067919 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W1987180021 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2001148873 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2003742652 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2004056710 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2006382921 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2017095600 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2031180101 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2034804545 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2038361943 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2052611179 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2056702956 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2057774311 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2073177452 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2079966192 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2084411125 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2094212659 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2096590148 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2109091190 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2113016544 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2116143545 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2117726177 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2118898434 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2132024770 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2152856539 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2169214517 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2170250612 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2227711391 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2246372546 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2281009752 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2338352108 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2472091914 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2501459404 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2533651411 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2538322819 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2540611206 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2550745894 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2552621682 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2564747588 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2605748642 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2606661788 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2610928204 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2613331596 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2733098106 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2735257115 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2746079348 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W2761276428 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W3125633930 @default.
• W2975074744 cites W610498301 @default.
• W2975074744 doi "https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072025" @default.
• W2975074744 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2975074744 type Work @default.
• W2975074744 sameAs 2975074744 @default.
• W2975074744 citedByCount "11" @default.
• W2975074744 countsByYear W29750747442020 @default.
• W2975074744 countsByYear W29750747442021 @default.
• W2975074744 countsByYear W29750747442022 @default.
• W2975074744 countsByYear W29750747442023 @default.
• W2975074744 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2975074744 hasAuthorship W2975074744A5014756325 @default.
• W2975074744 hasAuthorship W2975074744A5019424035 @default.
• W2975074744 hasAuthorship W2975074744A5022802322 @default.
• W2975074744 hasAuthorship W2975074744A5026372103 @default.
• W2975074744 hasAuthorship W2975074744A5038623685 @default.
• W2975074744 hasAuthorship W2975074744A5068777328 @default.
• W2975074744 hasAuthorship W2975074744A5069050975 @default.
• W2975074744 hasAuthorship W2975074744A5077747219 @default.
• W2975074744 hasAuthorship W2975074744A5078233398 @default.
• W2975074744 hasBestOaLocation W29750747441 @default.
• W2975074744 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2975074744 hasConcept C107826830 @default.
• W2975074744 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2975074744 hasConcept C148383697 @default.
• W2975074744 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2975074744 hasConcept C173727882 @default.
• W2975074744 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2975074744 hasConcept C191935318 @default.
• W2975074744 hasConcept C205649164 @default.

• next