Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2975205347> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 57 of
57
with 100 items per page.
- W2975205347 endingPage "291" @default.
- W2975205347 startingPage "291" @default.
- W2975205347 abstract "The United Kingdom case of Thoburn v Sunderland City Council suggests that there might be statutes that may not be impliedly repealed because of their constitutional status. This article examines the Thoburn decision and considers its implications for both the United Kingdom and New Zealand. This article questions whether Thoburn can be applied directly to New Zealand’s constitutional situation, and in particular whether New Zealand even has statutes that might be called constitutional. The role of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 is considered, as is the case of R v Pora, which can be seen as New Zealand’s forerunner to Thoburn.The article also examines the broader significance of the Thoburn decision and its implications for parliamentary sovereignty. Thoburn can be seen as a mid-point between the traditional supremacy of Parliament and a more rights-based jurisprudence because it protects rights without fettering Parliament’s ability to legislate." @default.
- W2975205347 created "2019-10-03" @default.
- W2975205347 creator A5016376643 @default.
- W2975205347 date "2005-08-01" @default.
- W2975205347 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W2975205347 title "Constitutional Statutes and Implied Repeal: The Thoburn Decision and the Consequences for New Zealand" @default.
- W2975205347 doi "https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v36i2.5604" @default.
- W2975205347 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
- W2975205347 type Work @default.
- W2975205347 sameAs 2975205347 @default.
- W2975205347 citedByCount "2" @default.
- W2975205347 countsByYear W29752053472014 @default.
- W2975205347 countsByYear W29752053472018 @default.
- W2975205347 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2975205347 hasAuthorship W2975205347A5016376643 @default.
- W2975205347 hasBestOaLocation W29752053471 @default.
- W2975205347 hasConcept C17319257 @default.
- W2975205347 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2975205347 hasConcept C186229450 @default.
- W2975205347 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2975205347 hasConcept C2776862595 @default.
- W2975205347 hasConcept C2777402285 @default.
- W2975205347 hasConcept C2780808987 @default.
- W2975205347 hasConcept C2781440851 @default.
- W2975205347 hasConcept C71043370 @default.
- W2975205347 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W2975205347 hasConceptScore W2975205347C17319257 @default.
- W2975205347 hasConceptScore W2975205347C17744445 @default.
- W2975205347 hasConceptScore W2975205347C186229450 @default.
- W2975205347 hasConceptScore W2975205347C199539241 @default.
- W2975205347 hasConceptScore W2975205347C2776862595 @default.
- W2975205347 hasConceptScore W2975205347C2777402285 @default.
- W2975205347 hasConceptScore W2975205347C2780808987 @default.
- W2975205347 hasConceptScore W2975205347C2781440851 @default.
- W2975205347 hasConceptScore W2975205347C71043370 @default.
- W2975205347 hasConceptScore W2975205347C94625758 @default.
- W2975205347 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W2975205347 hasLocation W29752053471 @default.
- W2975205347 hasOpenAccess W2975205347 @default.
- W2975205347 hasPrimaryLocation W29752053471 @default.
- W2975205347 hasRelatedWork W1012679232 @default.
- W2975205347 hasRelatedWork W1478127118 @default.
- W2975205347 hasRelatedWork W1498978361 @default.
- W2975205347 hasRelatedWork W1585230786 @default.
- W2975205347 hasRelatedWork W2241508019 @default.
- W2975205347 hasRelatedWork W2604999195 @default.
- W2975205347 hasRelatedWork W2618228284 @default.
- W2975205347 hasRelatedWork W3125195258 @default.
- W2975205347 hasRelatedWork W3199489135 @default.
- W2975205347 hasRelatedWork W4324025009 @default.
- W2975205347 hasVolume "36" @default.
- W2975205347 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2975205347 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2975205347 magId "2975205347" @default.
- W2975205347 workType "article" @default.