FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2975752912> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2975752912 endingPage "234" @default.
• W2975752912 startingPage "234" @default.
• W2975752912 abstract "Background Although shorter healing period was presented in many experimental and clinical studies using sandblasted and acid etched (SLA) surfaces, modification of this surface seems to presents a stronger bone response than its predecessor. Nevertheless, there is still lack of clinical data. Aim/Hypothesis The objective of this study is to compare the implant stability of Hiossen ET III implants with its new hydrophilic (NH) surface and Hiossen ET III implants with the sandblasted and acid-etched (SA) surface. Material and Methods Patients required at least two teeth to be rehabilitated with a fixed, implant-supported restoration, consecutively enrolled. Patients randomly received SA surface implants (SA group) or SA implants with a newly developed bio-absorbable apatite nanocoating (NH group). Outcome measures were implant and prosthetic survival rate, complications, insertion torque, and implant stability quotient (ISQ) measured at implant placement and every week up to 8 weeks after implant placement. Comparison between groups was made by unpaired t-test, while the comparison between each follow-up will be made by paired t-tests to detect any change during the follow-up. Complications and failures were compared using Fisher's exact test. Results One implant failed in the SA group 4 weeks after implant placement. No other implants and no prostheses failed in both group, at the one-year after implant placement follow-up. Two complications were experienced in the SA group. At the 2nd week after implants placement, two implants in the SA group showed discontinuous measurements versus none in the NH group (P > 0.05). Implants unscrewed during ISQ measurements and were rescrewed. Data recording stopped for 6 weeks. Both implants osseointegrated without any further complication. High ISQ values were found in both groups at each time point. The NH implants did not show physiological ISQ decrease between 2nd and 4th week after implant placement, showing a more even pattern of ISQ values compared with SA implants. Conclusion and Clinical Implications Novel NH implants are a viable alternative to SA surface, as they seem to avoid the ISQ drop during the remodeling phase. Further study is needed to confirm these preliminary results." @default.
• W2975752912 created "2019-10-03" @default.
• W2975752912 creator A5026002068 @default.
• W2975752912 creator A5052141817 @default.
• W2975752912 creator A5059456846 @default.
• W2975752912 creator A5062026145 @default.
• W2975752912 creator A5077549131 @default.
• W2975752912 creator A5080212215 @default.
• W2975752912 date "2019-09-01" @default.
• W2975752912 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2975752912 title "New hydrophilic implant surface‐ one‐year results from a split‐mouth RCT" @default.
• W2975752912 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.190_13509" @default.
• W2975752912 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2975752912 type Work @default.
• W2975752912 sameAs 2975752912 @default.
• W2975752912 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2975752912 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2975752912 hasAuthorship W2975752912A5026002068 @default.
• W2975752912 hasAuthorship W2975752912A5052141817 @default.
• W2975752912 hasAuthorship W2975752912A5059456846 @default.
• W2975752912 hasAuthorship W2975752912A5062026145 @default.
• W2975752912 hasAuthorship W2975752912A5077549131 @default.
• W2975752912 hasAuthorship W2975752912A5080212215 @default.
• W2975752912 hasConcept C101414908 @default.
• W2975752912 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2975752912 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2975752912 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2975752912 hasConcept C2775890951 @default.
• W2975752912 hasConcept C2778846597 @default.
• W2975752912 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W2975752912 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2975752912 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2975752912 hasConceptScore W2975752912C101414908 @default.
• W2975752912 hasConceptScore W2975752912C141071460 @default.
• W2975752912 hasConceptScore W2975752912C168563851 @default.
• W2975752912 hasConceptScore W2975752912C199343813 @default.
• W2975752912 hasConceptScore W2975752912C2775890951 @default.
• W2975752912 hasConceptScore W2975752912C2778846597 @default.
• W2975752912 hasConceptScore W2975752912C2781411149 @default.
• W2975752912 hasConceptScore W2975752912C29694066 @default.
• W2975752912 hasConceptScore W2975752912C71924100 @default.
• W2975752912 hasIssue "S19" @default.
• W2975752912 hasLocation W29757529121 @default.
• W2975752912 hasOpenAccess W2975752912 @default.
• W2975752912 hasPrimaryLocation W29757529121 @default.
• W2975752912 hasRelatedWork W1661393200 @default.
• W2975752912 hasRelatedWork W2007409359 @default.
• W2975752912 hasRelatedWork W2124728851 @default.
• W2975752912 hasRelatedWork W2218446307 @default.
• W2975752912 hasRelatedWork W2402909323 @default.
• W2975752912 hasRelatedWork W2582497977 @default.
• W2975752912 hasRelatedWork W2807118682 @default.
• W2975752912 hasRelatedWork W2888242737 @default.
• W2975752912 hasRelatedWork W3157947941 @default.
• W2975752912 hasRelatedWork W3092772609 @default.
• W2975752912 hasVolume "30" @default.
• W2975752912 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2975752912 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2975752912 magId "2975752912" @default.
• W2975752912 workType "article" @default.