FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2976559969> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2976559969 endingPage "317" @default.
• W2976559969 startingPage "308" @default.
• W2976559969 abstract "The objective of this article is to demonstrate the feasibility of estimating the backscatter coefficient (BSC) using an in situ calibration source. Traditional methods of estimating the BSC in vivo using a reference phantom technique do not account for transmission losses due to intervening layers between the ultrasonic source and the tissue region to be interrogated, leading to increases in bias and variance of BSC-based estimates. To account for transmission losses, an in situ calibration approach is proposed. The in situ calibration technique employs a titanium sphere that is well-characterized ultrasonically, biocompatible, and embedded inside the sample. A set of experiments was conducted to evaluate the embedded titanium spheres as in situ calibration targets for BSC estimation. The first experiment quantified the backscattered signal strength from titanium spheres of three sizes: 0.5, 1, and 2 mm in diameter. The second set of experiments assessed the repeatability of BSC estimates from the titanium spheres and compared these BSCs to theory. The third set of experiments quantified the ability of the titanium bead to provide an in situ reference spectrum in the presence of a lossy layer on top of the sample. The final set of experiments quantified the ability of the bead to provide a calibration spectrum over multiple depths in the sample. All experiments were conducted using an L9-4/38 linear array connected to a SonixOne system. The strongest signal was observed from the 2-mm titanium bead with the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 11.6 dB with respect to the background speckle. Using an analysis bandwidth of 2.5-5.5 MHz, the mean differences between the experimentally derived BSCs and BSCs derived from the Faran theory were 0.54 and 0.76 dB using the array and a single-element transducer, respectively. The BSCs estimated using the in situ calibration approach without the layer and with the layer and using the reference phantom approach with the layer were compared to the reference phantom approach without the layer present. The mean differences in BSCs were 0.15, 0.73, and -9.69 dB, respectively. The mean differences of the BSCs calculated from data blocks located at depths that were either 30 pulse lengths above or below the actual bead depth compared to the BSC calculated at bead depth were -1.55 and -1.48 dB, respectively. The results indicate that an in situ calibration target can account for overlaying tissue losses, thereby improving the robustness of BSC-based estimates." @default.
• W2976559969 created "2019-10-03" @default.
• W2976559969 creator A5004000426 @default.
• W2976559969 creator A5005908865 @default.
• W2976559969 creator A5007575592 @default.
• W2976559969 creator A5037838278 @default.
• W2976559969 date "2020-02-01" @default.
• W2976559969 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2976559969 title "Estimation of Backscatter Coefficients Using an In Situ Calibration Source" @default.
• W2976559969 cites W1975720861 @default.
• W2976559969 cites W1982104459 @default.
• W2976559969 cites W1982609121 @default.
• W2976559969 cites W1986418947 @default.
• W2976559969 cites W1987974696 @default.
• W2976559969 cites W1990644344 @default.
• W2976559969 cites W1992813979 @default.
• W2976559969 cites W1999907661 @default.
• W2976559969 cites W2009441128 @default.
• W2976559969 cites W2012649401 @default.
• W2976559969 cites W2016564320 @default.
• W2976559969 cites W2020844483 @default.
• W2976559969 cites W2030121753 @default.
• W2976559969 cites W2030895895 @default.
• W2976559969 cites W2036266209 @default.
• W2976559969 cites W2058045544 @default.
• W2976559969 cites W2071106797 @default.
• W2976559969 cites W2082720026 @default.
• W2976559969 cites W2083237704 @default.
• W2976559969 cites W2086068758 @default.
• W2976559969 cites W2095420574 @default.
• W2976559969 cites W2097392662 @default.
• W2976559969 cites W2109762309 @default.
• W2976559969 cites W2125493752 @default.
• W2976559969 cites W2127153256 @default.
• W2976559969 cites W2142929913 @default.
• W2976559969 cites W2224344929 @default.
• W2976559969 cites W2280059135 @default.
• W2976559969 cites W2627248834 @default.
• W2976559969 cites W2752397617 @default.
• W2976559969 cites W2891422633 @default.
• W2976559969 cites W4248922312 @default.
• W2976559969 doi "https://doi.org/10.1109/tuffc.2019.2944305" @default.
• W2976559969 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7075368" @default.
• W2976559969 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31567079" @default.
• W2976559969 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W2976559969 type Work @default.
• W2976559969 sameAs 2976559969 @default.
• W2976559969 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2976559969 countsByYear W29765599692022 @default.
• W2976559969 countsByYear W29765599692023 @default.
• W2976559969 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2976559969 hasAuthorship W2976559969A5004000426 @default.
• W2976559969 hasAuthorship W2976559969A5005908865 @default.
• W2976559969 hasAuthorship W2976559969A5007575592 @default.
• W2976559969 hasAuthorship W2976559969A5037838278 @default.
• W2976559969 hasBestOaLocation W29765599691 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConcept C104293457 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConcept C1276947 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConcept C153294291 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConcept C154020017 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConcept C165838908 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConcept C191897082 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConcept C24890656 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConcept C2777822432 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConcept C30354325 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConcept C506065880 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConcept C555944384 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConcept C72422203 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConcept C76155785 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConceptScore W2976559969C104293457 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConceptScore W2976559969C105795698 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConceptScore W2976559969C120665830 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConceptScore W2976559969C121332964 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConceptScore W2976559969C1276947 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConceptScore W2976559969C153294291 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConceptScore W2976559969C154020017 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConceptScore W2976559969C165838908 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConceptScore W2976559969C191897082 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConceptScore W2976559969C192562407 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConceptScore W2976559969C24890656 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConceptScore W2976559969C2777822432 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConceptScore W2976559969C30354325 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConceptScore W2976559969C33923547 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConceptScore W2976559969C41008148 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConceptScore W2976559969C506065880 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConceptScore W2976559969C555944384 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConceptScore W2976559969C72422203 @default.
• W2976559969 hasConceptScore W2976559969C76155785 @default.
• W2976559969 hasFunder F4320332161 @default.
• W2976559969 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2976559969 hasLocation W29765599691 @default.
• W2976559969 hasLocation W29765599692 @default.

• next