FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2977237116> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2977237116 endingPage "1446" @default.
• W2977237116 startingPage "1439" @default.
• W2977237116 abstract "Background: Fentanyl is one of the most widely used opioids for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). Sufentanil, a fentanyl analog, is suitable for postoperative pain control because it has no active metabolites and shows a higher therapeutic index and lower frequency of respiratory suppression than fentanyl. This study aimed to compare the two opioids for postoperative pain relief on the basis of analgesic efficacy, adverse effects, and patient satisfaction. Methods: Sixty-four patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy were randomly allocated into a fentanyl group (n = 31) or a sufentanil group (n = 33). The patients received 50-μg fentanyl or 10-μg sufentanil before induction of anesthesia and 5 minutes after uterine incision during surgery in the fentanyl and sufentanil group, respectively. After arriving at the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), verbal pain score (VPS) and sedation score were assessed. IV-PCA (fentanyl 1250 μg or sufentanil 250 μg with ondansetron 8 mg; total volume, 60 ml) was connected and continued for 48 h postoperatively. Postoperative pain was evaluated by using the numeric rating scale (NRS; at rest/during cough) at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours after surgery. The cumulative PCA consumption, patient satisfaction scores, and adverse effects were measured. Results: In the PACU, VPS was significantly higher and rescue fentanyl consumption was higher in the fentanyl group than in the sufentanil group, while the sedation score and adverse effects were comparable between the groups. No significant differences were observed in the NRS scores for pain (at rest/during cough) in the ward over 48 hours postoperatively, but the cumulative PCA consumption was significantly higher in the fentanyl group (47.4 ± 9.9 ml vs. 36.2 ± 14.6 ml, P = 0.01). There were no significant intergroup differences in patient satisfaction score and the incidence of adverse effects in the ward, except for a higher incidence of dry mouth in the fentanyl group. Conclusions: In comparison with fentanyl, sufentanil showed comparable analgesic efficacy and safety with less analgesic consumption (under a potency ratio of 1:5) in IV-PCA after total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Therefore, we suggest that sufentanil can be a useful alternative to fentanyl for IV-PCA." @default.
• W2977237116 created "2019-10-03" @default.
• W2977237116 creator A5001308261 @default.
• W2977237116 creator A5018982215 @default.
• W2977237116 creator A5024697965 @default.
• W2977237116 creator A5027790069 @default.
• W2977237116 creator A5060156046 @default.
• W2977237116 creator A5075934812 @default.
• W2977237116 creator A5087278666 @default.
• W2977237116 date "2019-01-01" @default.
• W2977237116 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2977237116 title "Comparison of the Analgesic Effect of Sufentanil versus Fentanyl in Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia after Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized, Double-blind, Prospective Study" @default.
• W2977237116 cites W1527941451 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W1988595442 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W1993790913 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W1994424236 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W1994989837 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W2005663103 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W2014219816 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W2015309781 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W2021662759 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W2036486200 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W2062102950 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W2065506323 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W2066724335 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W2072710126 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W2078414113 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W2103480955 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W2104925331 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W2109307601 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W2111868938 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W2114588857 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W2115798964 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W2119220128 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W2130141996 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W2141611984 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W2142960385 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W2163880090 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W2169665157 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W2347958023 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W2406147421 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W2463931198 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W2561563025 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W2591587451 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W2760543293 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W2886790768 @default.
• W2977237116 cites W92704039 @default.
• W2977237116 doi "https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.34656" @default.
• W2977237116 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6818204" @default.
• W2977237116 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31673234" @default.
• W2977237116 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2977237116 type Work @default.
• W2977237116 sameAs 2977237116 @default.
• W2977237116 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W2977237116 countsByYear W29772371162020 @default.
• W2977237116 countsByYear W29772371162021 @default.
• W2977237116 countsByYear W29772371162022 @default.
• W2977237116 countsByYear W29772371162023 @default.
• W2977237116 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2977237116 hasAuthorship W2977237116A5001308261 @default.
• W2977237116 hasAuthorship W2977237116A5018982215 @default.
• W2977237116 hasAuthorship W2977237116A5024697965 @default.
• W2977237116 hasAuthorship W2977237116A5027790069 @default.
• W2977237116 hasAuthorship W2977237116A5060156046 @default.
• W2977237116 hasAuthorship W2977237116A5075934812 @default.
• W2977237116 hasAuthorship W2977237116A5087278666 @default.
• W2977237116 hasBestOaLocation W29772371161 @default.
• W2977237116 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2977237116 hasConcept C197934379 @default.
• W2977237116 hasConcept C2776045914 @default.
• W2977237116 hasConcept C2776814716 @default.
• W2977237116 hasConcept C2777019824 @default.
• W2977237116 hasConcept C2777395641 @default.
• W2977237116 hasConcept C2780820201 @default.
• W2977237116 hasConcept C2781072394 @default.
• W2977237116 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2977237116 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2977237116 hasConceptScore W2977237116C126322002 @default.
• W2977237116 hasConceptScore W2977237116C197934379 @default.
• W2977237116 hasConceptScore W2977237116C2776045914 @default.
• W2977237116 hasConceptScore W2977237116C2776814716 @default.
• W2977237116 hasConceptScore W2977237116C2777019824 @default.
• W2977237116 hasConceptScore W2977237116C2777395641 @default.
• W2977237116 hasConceptScore W2977237116C2780820201 @default.
• W2977237116 hasConceptScore W2977237116C2781072394 @default.
• W2977237116 hasConceptScore W2977237116C42219234 @default.
• W2977237116 hasConceptScore W2977237116C71924100 @default.
• W2977237116 hasIssue "11" @default.
• W2977237116 hasLocation W29772371161 @default.
• W2977237116 hasLocation W29772371162 @default.
• W2977237116 hasLocation W29772371163 @default.
• W2977237116 hasLocation W29772371164 @default.
• W2977237116 hasOpenAccess W2977237116 @default.
• W2977237116 hasPrimaryLocation W29772371161 @default.
• W2977237116 hasRelatedWork W1978708132 @default.
• W2977237116 hasRelatedWork W2005074730 @default.
• W2977237116 hasRelatedWork W2365677615 @default.
• W2977237116 hasRelatedWork W2370634073 @default.

• next