Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2977422799> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 49 of
49
with 100 items per page.
- W2977422799 endingPage "S202" @default.
- W2977422799 startingPage "S202" @default.
- W2977422799 abstract "Purpose: To analyse the feasibility and outcome of endoscopic resection of colorectal neoplastic lesions at a district general hospital in UK. Methods: Retrospective review of case notes of all patients who underwent endoscopic mucosal resection of flat colonic mucosal lesions over a period of four years from 2002 to 2005 under the care of one consultant gastroenterologist. Results: 54 patients (age range 52–89 yrs) had removal of a total of 103 colorectal mucosal lesions (size range 3–90mm, median size 20mm). The site of the largest lesion was well spread out with 26 (48%) patients having lesions on right side and 28 (52%) on left side. 50 patients (93%) had successful endoscopic resection. EMR was not attempted in two patients due to technical reasons and two patients needed surgery following diagnosis of malignant polyp on histology. There were no major procedure related morbidity or mortality. After a median follow up of 24 months 39 (72%) were disease free, 4 (7%) had recurrence at the site of resection and 5 (9%) had new polyps. Conclusions: EMR is safe, effective and minimally invasive treatment for large benign colonic polyps. It is feasible with in the confines of basic endoscopic infrastructure available in any endoscopy unit of a district general hospital." @default.
- W2977422799 created "2019-10-10" @default.
- W2977422799 creator A5011997605 @default.
- W2977422799 creator A5068901672 @default.
- W2977422799 date "2006-09-01" @default.
- W2977422799 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2977422799 title "Endoscopic Mucosal Resection – Is It for Every One?" @default.
- W2977422799 doi "https://doi.org/10.14309/00000434-200609001-00472" @default.
- W2977422799 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
- W2977422799 type Work @default.
- W2977422799 sameAs 2977422799 @default.
- W2977422799 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2977422799 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2977422799 hasAuthorship W2977422799A5011997605 @default.
- W2977422799 hasAuthorship W2977422799A5068901672 @default.
- W2977422799 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2977422799 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
- W2977422799 hasConcept C2778451229 @default.
- W2977422799 hasConcept C2778866283 @default.
- W2977422799 hasConcept C2781156865 @default.
- W2977422799 hasConcept C3020475014 @default.
- W2977422799 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2977422799 hasConceptScore W2977422799C141071460 @default.
- W2977422799 hasConceptScore W2977422799C167135981 @default.
- W2977422799 hasConceptScore W2977422799C2778451229 @default.
- W2977422799 hasConceptScore W2977422799C2778866283 @default.
- W2977422799 hasConceptScore W2977422799C2781156865 @default.
- W2977422799 hasConceptScore W2977422799C3020475014 @default.
- W2977422799 hasConceptScore W2977422799C71924100 @default.
- W2977422799 hasLocation W29774227991 @default.
- W2977422799 hasOpenAccess W2977422799 @default.
- W2977422799 hasPrimaryLocation W29774227991 @default.
- W2977422799 hasRelatedWork W1218615589 @default.
- W2977422799 hasRelatedWork W206070877 @default.
- W2977422799 hasRelatedWork W2348539212 @default.
- W2977422799 hasRelatedWork W2402795681 @default.
- W2977422799 hasRelatedWork W2405635787 @default.
- W2977422799 hasRelatedWork W2411063770 @default.
- W2977422799 hasRelatedWork W2418260440 @default.
- W2977422799 hasRelatedWork W2559213786 @default.
- W2977422799 hasRelatedWork W2786016131 @default.
- W2977422799 hasRelatedWork W3110951622 @default.
- W2977422799 hasVolume "101" @default.
- W2977422799 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2977422799 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2977422799 magId "2977422799" @default.
- W2977422799 workType "article" @default.