FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2978240172> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2978240172 endingPage "S604" @default.
• W2978240172 startingPage "S603" @default.
• W2978240172 abstract "Purpose: This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a combination bowel preparation for colonoscopy consisting of 6 oz of oral sulfate solution followed by 2L of PEG-ELS (OS+PEG) given in both evening only (PM) or split dose (PM/AM) administrations. Methods: Adult outpatients scheduled for colonoscopy were enrolled into two separate single-blind, multicenter studies. In Study 1 (PM only dosing), patients took either OS+PEG (SuClear®) on the evening prior to colonoscopy, or 10mg bisacodyl plus 2L of PEG-ELS (HalfLytely®). In Study 2 (split-dosing), patients took either OS+PEG (OS in PM / PEG in AM) or PEG with ascorbic acid (PEG-EA) (MoviPrep®). Colonoscopies were performed by investigators blinded to treatment assignment. Cleansing was graded using a 4 point scale (Excellent:no more than small bits of adherent feces/fluid, Good: small amounts of feces or fluid not interfering with exam, Fair: enough feces or fluid to prevent a completely reliable exam, Poor: large amounts of fecal residue, additional cleansing required) where scores of Good or Excellent were considered “successful”. Patients completed a rating scale for expected preparation symptoms. Safety was also assessed by adverse event reports and laboratory testing. In Study 1, preparation completion time was also reported. Results: OS+PEG was non-inferior to PEG+Bis and PEG-EA in achieving successful cleansing, with both OS+PEG regimens having >90% success (p<0.001). For PM only dosing, more OS+PEG preparations were graded as Excellent than with PEG+Bis (p=0.01). The time to complete the preparation was shorter with OS+PEG in Study 1 (3.7 hrs) than PEG+Bis (5.5 hrs, p<0.001). There were no clinically significant differences between OS+PEG and the comparator preps in laboratory parameters (including serum electrolytes and creatinine). In Study 1, OS+PEG patients rated their overall discomfort slightly higher than PEG+Bis patients (p=0.032). In Study 2, PEG-EA patients rated their bloating slightly higher than OS+PEG (p=0.03), while OS+PEG patients experienced slightly more vomiting (p=0.04). Conclusion: OS+PEG provided equivalent cleansing to the marketed control preparations when administered in a PM only or split dose regimen. When given in a PM only dose, it was superior to PEG+Bis in Excellent preparations and its predictable regimen resulted in a shortened prep time. With OS+PEG, there appears to be no qualitative difference between PM only and split-dose regimens, with both achieving high cleansing success rates. There were no clinically significant safety differences between OS+PEG and the control preparations, and it can therefore be considered a safe and effective option for bowel preparation. Disclosure - Mr. McGowan - Employee: Braintree Laboratories; Dr. Cleveland - Employee: Braintree Laboratories; Dr. Rex - Speaker's Bureau: Ferring Laboratories, Speaker's Bureau: Braintree Laboratories; Dr. Di Palma - Speaker's Bureau: Braintree Laboratories, Other: Medical Director, Braintree Laboratories.Table: Table. Bowel Preparation Cleansing Efficacy" @default.
• W2978240172 created "2019-10-10" @default.
• W2978240172 creator A5015157882 @default.
• W2978240172 creator A5067499088 @default.
• W2978240172 creator A5069144756 @default.
• W2978240172 creator A5083845259 @default.
• W2978240172 date "2013-10-01" @default.
• W2978240172 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2978240172 title "A Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of a New Oral Sulfate Solution and PEG-ELS Combination Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy" @default.
• W2978240172 doi "https://doi.org/10.14309/00000434-201310001-01986" @default.
• W2978240172 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2978240172 type Work @default.
• W2978240172 sameAs 2978240172 @default.
• W2978240172 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2978240172 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2978240172 hasAuthorship W2978240172A5015157882 @default.
• W2978240172 hasAuthorship W2978240172A5067499088 @default.
• W2978240172 hasAuthorship W2978240172A5069144756 @default.
• W2978240172 hasAuthorship W2978240172A5083845259 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConcept C1276947 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConcept C197934379 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConcept C2776476923 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConcept C2776530707 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConcept C2777068960 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConcept C2777288759 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConcept C2778435480 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConcept C54400483 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConcept C71527416 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConcept C90924648 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConceptScore W2978240172C10138342 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConceptScore W2978240172C121332964 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConceptScore W2978240172C121608353 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConceptScore W2978240172C126322002 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConceptScore W2978240172C1276947 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConceptScore W2978240172C141071460 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConceptScore W2978240172C162324750 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConceptScore W2978240172C197934379 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConceptScore W2978240172C2776476923 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConceptScore W2978240172C2776530707 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConceptScore W2978240172C2777068960 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConceptScore W2978240172C2777288759 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConceptScore W2978240172C2778435480 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConceptScore W2978240172C526805850 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConceptScore W2978240172C54400483 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConceptScore W2978240172C71527416 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConceptScore W2978240172C71924100 @default.
• W2978240172 hasConceptScore W2978240172C90924648 @default.
• W2978240172 hasLocation W29782401721 @default.
• W2978240172 hasOpenAccess W2978240172 @default.
• W2978240172 hasPrimaryLocation W29782401721 @default.
• W2978240172 hasRelatedWork W2115376310 @default.
• W2978240172 hasRelatedWork W2141041213 @default.
• W2978240172 hasRelatedWork W2153071020 @default.
• W2978240172 hasRelatedWork W2260016483 @default.
• W2978240172 hasRelatedWork W2266455929 @default.
• W2978240172 hasRelatedWork W2395827093 @default.
• W2978240172 hasRelatedWork W2433735509 @default.
• W2978240172 hasRelatedWork W3176957106 @default.
• W2978240172 hasRelatedWork W4254881487 @default.
• W2978240172 hasRelatedWork W97016882 @default.
• W2978240172 hasVolume "108" @default.
• W2978240172 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2978240172 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2978240172 magId "2978240172" @default.
• W2978240172 workType "article" @default.