FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2978847089> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2978847089 endingPage "S164" @default.
• W2978847089 startingPage "S164" @default.
• W2978847089 abstract "Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of repeat hepatic resection for recurrent hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer and the clinicopathological factors influencing overall survival after repeat resection. Methods: Between 1992 and 2006, 271 consecutive patients underwent initial hepatic resection for metastases from colorectal cancer. Of these, 114 (42.1%) developed recurrences of remnant liver, and repeat hepatic resection was performed in the 38 patients. Clinicopathological features and long-term outcomes were compared between the initial hepatic resection and the repeat hepatic resection, and prognostic factors for repeat hepatic resections were analyzed. Hepatectomy was attempted if all tumors could be resected and residual liver function was adequate. Patients with resectable distant metastases were also seletcted. Results: Operative data: Operation time was not significantly different between the two groups (repeat resection: 457.4±153.9 minutes vs. initial resection: 430.5 ±150.0 minutes p=0.335). Operative bleeding was significantly increased in repeat hepatic resection as compared to initial resection (repeat: 1692.9±1511.5g vs. initial: 1266.6±1041.3g p=0.036). Postoperative hospital stay was similar (repeat: 17.9 ±9.5 days vs. initial: 20.2±11.2 days p=0.249). Morbidity and mortality: The morbidity after repeat hepatic resection was similar to that after initial resection (repeat: 15.8% vs. initial: 27.3% p=0.129). One patient died within 30 days after initial hepatic resection (0.37%, 1/271). However there was no postoperative mortality in the 38 patients who underwent repeat hepatic resection. Long-term outcome: The overall cumulative 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates, and median survival time, for the 38 repeat hepatic resection (100%, 79.9% and 53.8%, and 60 months,respectively) did not differ from those for the initial hepatic resection (89.0%, 60.4% and 48.8%, and 50 months, respectively, p=0.275) There was no significant difference in remnant liver 5-year hepatic recurrence-free survival rate between the repeat resection (49.2%) and the initial resection (50.8%) (p=0.934). Prognostic factor after repeat hepatic resection: In the univariate analysis, surgical margin less than 5mm was identified as poor prognostic factor for repeat hepatic resection (p=0.047). Conclusion: Repeat hepatic resection can provide long-term survival rates similar to those of initial hepatic resection, with no mortality and comparable morbidity. Achieving a safety surgical margin is the relevant prognostic factor for a favourable prognosis after repeat hepatic resection." @default.
• W2978847089 created "2019-10-10" @default.
• W2978847089 creator A5011672031 @default.
• W2978847089 creator A5015408047 @default.
• W2978847089 creator A5023606676 @default.
• W2978847089 creator A5032132419 @default.
• W2978847089 creator A5033319849 @default.
• W2978847089 creator A5043460153 @default.
• W2978847089 creator A5049147704 @default.
• W2978847089 creator A5053513593 @default.
• W2978847089 creator A5067585940 @default.
• W2978847089 date "2009-10-01" @default.
• W2978847089 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2978847089 title "Repeat Hepatic Resection for Recurrent Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer" @default.
• W2978847089 doi "https://doi.org/10.14309/00000434-200910003-00437" @default.
• W2978847089 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2978847089 type Work @default.
• W2978847089 sameAs 2978847089 @default.
• W2978847089 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2978847089 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2978847089 hasAuthorship W2978847089A5011672031 @default.
• W2978847089 hasAuthorship W2978847089A5015408047 @default.
• W2978847089 hasAuthorship W2978847089A5023606676 @default.
• W2978847089 hasAuthorship W2978847089A5032132419 @default.
• W2978847089 hasAuthorship W2978847089A5033319849 @default.
• W2978847089 hasAuthorship W2978847089A5043460153 @default.
• W2978847089 hasAuthorship W2978847089A5049147704 @default.
• W2978847089 hasAuthorship W2978847089A5053513593 @default.
• W2978847089 hasAuthorship W2978847089A5067585940 @default.
• W2978847089 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2978847089 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2978847089 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2978847089 hasConcept C159110652 @default.
• W2978847089 hasConcept C2776909242 @default.
• W2978847089 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W2978847089 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2978847089 hasConcept C90924648 @default.
• W2978847089 hasConceptScore W2978847089C121608353 @default.
• W2978847089 hasConceptScore W2978847089C126322002 @default.
• W2978847089 hasConceptScore W2978847089C141071460 @default.
• W2978847089 hasConceptScore W2978847089C159110652 @default.
• W2978847089 hasConceptScore W2978847089C2776909242 @default.
• W2978847089 hasConceptScore W2978847089C526805850 @default.
• W2978847089 hasConceptScore W2978847089C71924100 @default.
• W2978847089 hasConceptScore W2978847089C90924648 @default.
• W2978847089 hasLocation W29788470891 @default.
• W2978847089 hasOpenAccess W2978847089 @default.
• W2978847089 hasPrimaryLocation W29788470891 @default.
• W2978847089 hasRelatedWork W2078510975 @default.
• W2978847089 hasRelatedWork W2357768821 @default.
• W2978847089 hasRelatedWork W2367464587 @default.
• W2978847089 hasRelatedWork W2402488554 @default.
• W2978847089 hasRelatedWork W2413726792 @default.
• W2978847089 hasRelatedWork W2414405063 @default.
• W2978847089 hasRelatedWork W2518231082 @default.
• W2978847089 hasRelatedWork W2998154030 @default.
• W2978847089 hasRelatedWork W403758582 @default.
• W2978847089 hasRelatedWork W617733760 @default.
• W2978847089 hasVolume "104" @default.
• W2978847089 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2978847089 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2978847089 magId "2978847089" @default.
• W2978847089 workType "article" @default.