FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2979168159> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2979168159 endingPage "1023" @default.
• W2979168159 startingPage "1018" @default.
• W2979168159 abstract "Abstract Purpose To evaluate the effect of different wax pattern fabrication techniques on the fit of customized pressed lithium disilicate implant abutments on titanium inserts before and after pressing. The marginal fit results of pressed lithium disilicate implant abutments were then compared with those of milled lithium disilicate abutments. Materials and Methods After scanning the titanium inserts and designing an implant abutment, wax patterns were fabricated with three techniques (n = 15 each): computer‐aided design/computer‐aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) milling, 3D printing and conventional layering. The marginal fit (µm) was measured using a stereomicroscope for all the wax patterns before pressing them into the lithium disilicate abutments. The pressed implant abutments were measured again for marginal fit, and the results were compared to those of the milled lithium disilicate abutments. One‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess different wax pattern fabrication techniques in each stage before and after pressing. One‐way ANOVA was also used to compare the groups of pressed and milled lithium disilicate abutments. Multiple pairwise comparisons were performed using the Tukey post hoc test in each stage. Results There were statistically significant differences between the marginal fit of the three wax patterns groups ( p < 0.001; f = 123.33), wherein the mean marginal fit was the highest for conventionally layered wax patterns (30 ± 13.09) µm. Furthermore, after pressing, there were statistically significant differences between the marginal fit of the three pressed abutments groups ( p < 0.001; f = 518.62), wherein the mean marginal fit was the highest for pressed e.max abutments fabricated from conventionally layered wax patterns (25.26 ± 3.9) µm. There was no statistically significant difference between the mean marginal fit of the pressed abutments fabricated from conventional layered wax patterns and that of the milled CAD/CAM abutments. However, the mean marginal fit of the milled CAD/CAM abutments was higher than that of the pressed abutments fabricated from both CAD/CAM wax and 3D printed wax. Conclusion All the tested fabrication methods provided degrees of accuracy that lie well within accepted limits. The use of pressed lithium disilicate abutments fabricated from conventional layering wax pattern technique should provide a more consistent better marginal fit between the titanium insert and the abutment and may therefore be the preferable fabrication method." @default.
• W2979168159 created "2019-10-10" @default.
• W2979168159 creator A5023213084 @default.
• W2979168159 creator A5032018459 @default.
• W2979168159 creator A5058272971 @default.
• W2979168159 creator A5066968417 @default.
• W2979168159 creator A5072813124 @default.
• W2979168159 creator A5088311400 @default.
• W2979168159 date "2019-10-11" @default.
• W2979168159 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W2979168159 title "The Effect of Different Wax Pattern Fabrication Techniques on the Marginal Fit of Customized Lithium Disilicate Implant Abutments" @default.
• W2979168159 cites W1966634267 @default.
• W2979168159 cites W1980538895 @default.
• W2979168159 cites W2024830835 @default.
• W2979168159 cites W2029503199 @default.
• W2979168159 cites W2055919066 @default.
• W2979168159 cites W2062750634 @default.
• W2979168159 cites W2064621790 @default.
• W2979168159 cites W2075611807 @default.
• W2979168159 cites W2114891973 @default.
• W2979168159 cites W2129403702 @default.
• W2979168159 cites W2129917154 @default.
• W2979168159 cites W2133629102 @default.
• W2979168159 cites W2170262108 @default.
• W2979168159 cites W2396140021 @default.
• W2979168159 cites W2408753849 @default.
• W2979168159 cites W2410712635 @default.
• W2979168159 cites W2555058750 @default.
• W2979168159 cites W2561648030 @default.
• W2979168159 cites W2566954773 @default.
• W2979168159 cites W2883336440 @default.
• W2979168159 cites W316556568 @default.
• W2979168159 cites W4210955854 @default.
• W2979168159 cites W4234073381 @default.
• W2979168159 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13112" @default.
• W2979168159 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31573716" @default.
• W2979168159 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2979168159 type Work @default.
• W2979168159 sameAs 2979168159 @default.
• W2979168159 citedByCount "14" @default.
• W2979168159 countsByYear W29791681592020 @default.
• W2979168159 countsByYear W29791681592021 @default.
• W2979168159 countsByYear W29791681592022 @default.
• W2979168159 countsByYear W29791681592023 @default.
• W2979168159 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2979168159 hasAuthorship W2979168159A5023213084 @default.
• W2979168159 hasAuthorship W2979168159A5032018459 @default.
• W2979168159 hasAuthorship W2979168159A5058272971 @default.
• W2979168159 hasAuthorship W2979168159A5066968417 @default.
• W2979168159 hasAuthorship W2979168159A5072813124 @default.
• W2979168159 hasAuthorship W2979168159A5088311400 @default.
• W2979168159 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2979168159 hasConcept C134132462 @default.
• W2979168159 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2979168159 hasConcept C153033020 @default.
• W2979168159 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2979168159 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2979168159 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2979168159 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W2979168159 hasConcept C2908906697 @default.
• W2979168159 hasConcept C2910996203 @default.
• W2979168159 hasConcept C48777230 @default.
• W2979168159 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W2979168159 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2979168159 hasConceptScore W2979168159C127413603 @default.
• W2979168159 hasConceptScore W2979168159C134132462 @default.
• W2979168159 hasConceptScore W2979168159C141071460 @default.
• W2979168159 hasConceptScore W2979168159C153033020 @default.
• W2979168159 hasConceptScore W2979168159C159985019 @default.
• W2979168159 hasConceptScore W2979168159C192562407 @default.
• W2979168159 hasConceptScore W2979168159C199343813 @default.
• W2979168159 hasConceptScore W2979168159C2781411149 @default.
• W2979168159 hasConceptScore W2979168159C2908906697 @default.
• W2979168159 hasConceptScore W2979168159C2910996203 @default.
• W2979168159 hasConceptScore W2979168159C48777230 @default.
• W2979168159 hasConceptScore W2979168159C66938386 @default.
• W2979168159 hasConceptScore W2979168159C71924100 @default.
• W2979168159 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W2979168159 hasLocation W29791681591 @default.
• W2979168159 hasLocation W29791681592 @default.
• W2979168159 hasOpenAccess W2979168159 @default.
• W2979168159 hasPrimaryLocation W29791681591 @default.
• W2979168159 hasRelatedWork W1991680604 @default.
• W2979168159 hasRelatedWork W1994205211 @default.
• W2979168159 hasRelatedWork W2142979842 @default.
• W2979168159 hasRelatedWork W2292665973 @default.
• W2979168159 hasRelatedWork W2402648521 @default.
• W2979168159 hasRelatedWork W2410453387 @default.
• W2979168159 hasRelatedWork W2588731965 @default.
• W2979168159 hasRelatedWork W2790853912 @default.
• W2979168159 hasRelatedWork W2963909934 @default.
• W2979168159 hasRelatedWork W3094769066 @default.
• W2979168159 hasVolume "28" @default.
• W2979168159 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2979168159 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2979168159 magId "2979168159" @default.
• W2979168159 workType "article" @default.