FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2979412877> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2979412877 abstract "Abstract Background A recent hypothesis purports that spinal manipulation may cause changes at a brain level. Functional Neurology, a mainly chiropractic approach, promotes the use of spinal manipulation to improve ‘brain function’ as if it were a proven construct. No systematic review has been performed to investigate how well founded this hypothesis is. Objective To investigate whether spinal manipulation has an effect on ‘brain function’ that is associated with any clinical benefits. Method In this systematic review, the literature was searched in PubMed, Embase, and PEDro (final search February 2018). We included randomized or non-randomized controlled studies, in which spinal manipulation was performed to any region of the spine, applied on either symptomatic or asymptomatic humans, and compared to a sham or to another type of control. The outcome measures had to be stated as direct or proxy markers of ‘brain function’. Articles were reviewed blindly by at least two reviewers, using a quality checklist designed for the specific needs of the review. Studies were classified as of ‘acceptable’, ‘medium’, or ‘low’ methodological quality. Results were reported in relation to (i) control intervention (sham, ‘inactive control’, or ‘another physical stimulus’) and (ii) study subjects (healthy, symptomatic, or with spinal pain” subjects/spinal pain”), taking into account the quality. Only results obtained from between-group or between-intervention comparisons were considered in the final analysis. Results Eighteen of 1514 articles were included. Studies were generally of ‘low’ or ‘medium’ methodological quality, most comparing spinal manipulation to a control other than a sham. Thirteen out of the 18 studies could be included in the final analysis. Transitory effects of different types of ‘brain function’ were reported in the three studies comparing spinal manipulation to sham (but of uncertain credibility), in “subclinical neck/spinal pain” subjects or in symptomatic subjects. None of these three studies, of ‘medium’ or ‘acceptable’ quality, investigated whether the neurophysiological effects reported were associated with clinical benefits. The remaining 10 studies, generally of ‘low’ or ‘medium’ quality, compared spinal manipulation to ‘inactive control’ or ‘another physical stimulus’ and similarly reported significant between-group differences but inconsistently. Conclusion The available evidence suggests that changes occur in ‘brain function’ in response to spinal manipulation but are inconsistent across and - sometimes - within studies. The clinical relevance of these changes is unknown. It is therefore premature to promote the use of spinal manipulation as a treatment to improve ‘brain function’." @default.
• W2979412877 created "2019-10-18" @default.
• W2979412877 creator A5018269158 @default.
• W2979412877 creator A5035220104 @default.
• W2979412877 creator A5038859625 @default.
• W2979412877 creator A5061438444 @default.
• W2979412877 creator A5069039890 @default.
• W2979412877 date "2019-10-02" @default.
• W2979412877 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2979412877 title "Unravelling functional neurology: does spinal manipulation have an effect on the brain? - a systematic literature review" @default.
• W2979412877 cites W1518596071 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W1991664247 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W2003366729 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W2015090609 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W2016675976 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W2032541700 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W2041395273 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W2044441627 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W2090396746 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W2090715810 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W2097049528 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W2114623284 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W2117620243 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W2134305330 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W2135456462 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W2137278995 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W2138030023 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W2140358254 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W2147818819 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W2175341011 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W2294844905 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W2566863850 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W2570727683 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W2575421631 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W2737825781 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W2761631729 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W2768669365 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W2775398406 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W2782662883 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W2791683052 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W2795613832 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W2809764665 @default.
• W2979412877 cites W2974795905 @default.
• W2979412877 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-019-0265-8" @default.
• W2979412877 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6788096" @default.
• W2979412877 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31632640" @default.
• W2979412877 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2979412877 type Work @default.
• W2979412877 sameAs 2979412877 @default.
• W2979412877 citedByCount "13" @default.
• W2979412877 countsByYear W29794128772020 @default.
• W2979412877 countsByYear W29794128772021 @default.
• W2979412877 countsByYear W29794128772022 @default.
• W2979412877 countsByYear W29794128772023 @default.
• W2979412877 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2979412877 hasAuthorship W2979412877A5018269158 @default.
• W2979412877 hasAuthorship W2979412877A5035220104 @default.
• W2979412877 hasAuthorship W2979412877A5038859625 @default.
• W2979412877 hasAuthorship W2979412877A5061438444 @default.
• W2979412877 hasAuthorship W2979412877A5069039890 @default.
• W2979412877 hasBestOaLocation W29794128771 @default.
• W2979412877 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2979412877 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2979412877 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2979412877 hasConcept C16568411 @default.
• W2979412877 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2979412877 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2979412877 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2979412877 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2979412877 hasConcept C2779356329 @default.
• W2979412877 hasConcept C2779470654 @default.
• W2979412877 hasConcept C516994506 @default.
• W2979412877 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2979412877 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2979412877 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
• W2979412877 hasConceptScore W2979412877C118552586 @default.
• W2979412877 hasConceptScore W2979412877C142724271 @default.
• W2979412877 hasConceptScore W2979412877C15744967 @default.
• W2979412877 hasConceptScore W2979412877C16568411 @default.
• W2979412877 hasConceptScore W2979412877C168563851 @default.
• W2979412877 hasConceptScore W2979412877C180747234 @default.
• W2979412877 hasConceptScore W2979412877C1862650 @default.
• W2979412877 hasConceptScore W2979412877C204787440 @default.
• W2979412877 hasConceptScore W2979412877C2779356329 @default.
• W2979412877 hasConceptScore W2979412877C2779470654 @default.
• W2979412877 hasConceptScore W2979412877C516994506 @default.
• W2979412877 hasConceptScore W2979412877C71924100 @default.
• W2979412877 hasConceptScore W2979412877C95190672 @default.
• W2979412877 hasConceptScore W2979412877C99508421 @default.
• W2979412877 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2979412877 hasLocation W29794128771 @default.
• W2979412877 hasLocation W29794128772 @default.
• W2979412877 hasLocation W29794128773 @default.
• W2979412877 hasLocation W29794128774 @default.
• W2979412877 hasLocation W29794128775 @default.
• W2979412877 hasLocation W29794128776 @default.
• W2979412877 hasOpenAccess W2979412877 @default.
• W2979412877 hasPrimaryLocation W29794128771 @default.
• W2979412877 hasRelatedWork W192633400 @default.
• W2979412877 hasRelatedWork W1979295680 @default.

• next