Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2979435563> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 67 of
67
with 100 items per page.
- W2979435563 endingPage "15" @default.
- W2979435563 startingPage "7" @default.
- W2979435563 abstract "The purpose of this essay is to investigate some of the uses of English prepositions and Hungarian case endings employed to express spatial relations. The observation of invariant mistakes Hungarian native speakers learning English make initiated the investigation. The questions raised are: (a) where do the two systems match and where do mismatches lie, (b) how do language users perceive the world, and (c) do speakers observe spatial relations as two-dimensional or three-dimensional cognitive models? Do different languages see the same thing as either three-dimensional, or two-dimensional?Abondolo (1988) gives an adequate morphological analysis of ten Hungarian case-endings (inessive, illative, elative, superessive, delative, sublative adessive, ablative, allative and terminative) used in spatial reference, which give a closed set in references made to factors, such as (1) location which can be broken down as interior vs. exterior location with the latter being further analysable as superficial and proximal, and (2) orientation which can be analysed as zero orientation (position), source and goal. In addition to those in this list, two other case endings (genetive/dative and locative) are also used for expressing spatial relations but the last is only a variant of the inessive and superessive case-endings and is only used with place-names. The set is closed in the sense that the same item is meant to refer to the same sort of spatial relation in every case. Language textbooks, c.f. Benkő (1972) seem to suggest a neat match between the above Hungarian case endings and their English prepositional counterparts, e.g. London-ban (inessive) = in London.The picture, however, is far from being so clear-cut. The data, which were taken from various dictionaries and textbooks, show that the choices of both the prepositions and the case endings listed above depend on how the speaker considers factors (1) and (2) and that proximity is very important. Instead of a one-to-one match between the prepositions and the case endings, we rather find that the above case endings will match a dual, and in some cases a tripartite system of prepositions with the correspondences found in the two languages, which yield the following chart:
 
 We suggest that languages may view or map the same physical entities in different ways, for example along surface vs. volume or goal vs. passage, etc.Furthermore, we also find it possible that it is the language specific, inherent coding of the nominal phrase that decides – in many cases – upon the choice of prepositions and case endings." @default.
- W2979435563 created "2019-10-18" @default.
- W2979435563 creator A5025064849 @default.
- W2979435563 creator A5076340032 @default.
- W2979435563 date "2002-05-12" @default.
- W2979435563 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W2979435563 title "Dimensionality Expressed by Caseendings and Spatial Prepositions" @default.
- W2979435563 cites W1545196839 @default.
- W2979435563 cites W1582001079 @default.
- W2979435563 cites W2073493034 @default.
- W2979435563 cites W2959893177 @default.
- W2979435563 cites W2999879234 @default.
- W2979435563 doi "https://doi.org/10.34101/actaagrar/1/3528" @default.
- W2979435563 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
- W2979435563 type Work @default.
- W2979435563 sameAs 2979435563 @default.
- W2979435563 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2979435563 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2979435563 hasAuthorship W2979435563A5025064849 @default.
- W2979435563 hasAuthorship W2979435563A5076340032 @default.
- W2979435563 hasBestOaLocation W29794355631 @default.
- W2979435563 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2979435563 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
- W2979435563 hasConcept C177264268 @default.
- W2979435563 hasConcept C197644857 @default.
- W2979435563 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
- W2979435563 hasConcept C25343380 @default.
- W2979435563 hasConcept C27511587 @default.
- W2979435563 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2979435563 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2979435563 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W2979435563 hasConcept C77088390 @default.
- W2979435563 hasConcept C88548561 @default.
- W2979435563 hasConcept C94375191 @default.
- W2979435563 hasConceptScore W2979435563C138885662 @default.
- W2979435563 hasConceptScore W2979435563C154945302 @default.
- W2979435563 hasConceptScore W2979435563C177264268 @default.
- W2979435563 hasConceptScore W2979435563C197644857 @default.
- W2979435563 hasConceptScore W2979435563C199360897 @default.
- W2979435563 hasConceptScore W2979435563C25343380 @default.
- W2979435563 hasConceptScore W2979435563C27511587 @default.
- W2979435563 hasConceptScore W2979435563C33923547 @default.
- W2979435563 hasConceptScore W2979435563C41008148 @default.
- W2979435563 hasConceptScore W2979435563C41895202 @default.
- W2979435563 hasConceptScore W2979435563C77088390 @default.
- W2979435563 hasConceptScore W2979435563C88548561 @default.
- W2979435563 hasConceptScore W2979435563C94375191 @default.
- W2979435563 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W2979435563 hasLocation W29794355631 @default.
- W2979435563 hasOpenAccess W2979435563 @default.
- W2979435563 hasPrimaryLocation W29794355631 @default.
- W2979435563 hasRelatedWork W1969994439 @default.
- W2979435563 hasRelatedWork W2001076137 @default.
- W2979435563 hasRelatedWork W2002125059 @default.
- W2979435563 hasRelatedWork W2076711840 @default.
- W2979435563 hasRelatedWork W2153257161 @default.
- W2979435563 hasRelatedWork W2157131010 @default.
- W2979435563 hasRelatedWork W2359711906 @default.
- W2979435563 hasRelatedWork W2679897670 @default.
- W2979435563 hasRelatedWork W2800000035 @default.
- W2979435563 hasRelatedWork W2896692727 @default.
- W2979435563 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2979435563 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2979435563 magId "2979435563" @default.
- W2979435563 workType "article" @default.