Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2980501053> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 69 of
69
with 100 items per page.
- W2980501053 endingPage "678" @default.
- W2980501053 startingPage "619" @default.
- W2980501053 abstract "Like courts in other states, Iowa courts employ a multi-factor test for veil piercing that evaluates business owners and their entities based on undercapitalization, commingling of finances, failure to observe formalities, and the like. Yet Iowa precedent assigns no weight to any of the factors, offers few insights concerning their meaning, and even less guidance on the factors’ relationship to the justifications for piercing. This Article outlines a path for bringing greater order and predictability to Iowa piercing jurisprudence, starting with a taxonomy based on legal scholars’ consensus that courts are justified in piercing when those controlling the entity do one or more of the following: (1) use the corporate privilege to evade obligations imposed by other legal schemes; (2) engage in fraud, misrepresentation or similar deceptive behavior to obtain corporate credit; or (3) engage in abusive self-dealing that improperly subordinates creditor claims to corporate assets. If one first identifies the asserted policy justification for piercing in a particular case, the Article explains, it becomes easier to assess whether traditional piercing “factors” like undercapitalization, commingling of finances, or failure to follow formalities warrant application of the remedy, and why. Accordingly, the Article recommends that Iowa courts require piercing plaintiffs to identify one or more of the foregoing policy justifications for the piercing remedy before determining whether any traditional piercing factors support granting that relief. The Article also challenges Iowa’s tradition of leaving piercing decisions to juries. Piercing is an equitable remedy that judges should administer without juries, But even if piercing is a legal claim, a decision to grant or withhold the piercing remedy is a law- and policy-making exercise, and thus a legal question for the court. Accordingly, the Article recommends that regardless of whether judge or jury makes the underlying factual findings in piercing cases, Iowa judges, rather than juries, should decide whether to grant and how to shape the piercing remedy." @default.
- W2980501053 created "2019-10-25" @default.
- W2980501053 creator A5067021817 @default.
- W2980501053 date "2019-01-01" @default.
- W2980501053 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2980501053 title "Lifting the Veil on Iowa Piercing Jurisprudence and Suggestions for Reform" @default.
- W2980501053 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
- W2980501053 type Work @default.
- W2980501053 sameAs 2980501053 @default.
- W2980501053 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2980501053 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2980501053 hasAuthorship W2980501053A5067021817 @default.
- W2980501053 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
- W2980501053 hasConcept C120527767 @default.
- W2980501053 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2980501053 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W2980501053 hasConcept C159091798 @default.
- W2980501053 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2980501053 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W2980501053 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2980501053 hasConcept C2776916960 @default.
- W2980501053 hasConcept C2779602731 @default.
- W2980501053 hasConcept C2780138299 @default.
- W2980501053 hasConcept C71043370 @default.
- W2980501053 hasConcept C97460637 @default.
- W2980501053 hasConceptScore W2980501053C10138342 @default.
- W2980501053 hasConceptScore W2980501053C120527767 @default.
- W2980501053 hasConceptScore W2980501053C144024400 @default.
- W2980501053 hasConceptScore W2980501053C144133560 @default.
- W2980501053 hasConceptScore W2980501053C159091798 @default.
- W2980501053 hasConceptScore W2980501053C17744445 @default.
- W2980501053 hasConceptScore W2980501053C190253527 @default.
- W2980501053 hasConceptScore W2980501053C199539241 @default.
- W2980501053 hasConceptScore W2980501053C2776916960 @default.
- W2980501053 hasConceptScore W2980501053C2779602731 @default.
- W2980501053 hasConceptScore W2980501053C2780138299 @default.
- W2980501053 hasConceptScore W2980501053C71043370 @default.
- W2980501053 hasConceptScore W2980501053C97460637 @default.
- W2980501053 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2980501053 hasLocation W29805010531 @default.
- W2980501053 hasOpenAccess W2980501053 @default.
- W2980501053 hasPrimaryLocation W29805010531 @default.
- W2980501053 hasRelatedWork W1591120413 @default.
- W2980501053 hasRelatedWork W186978321 @default.
- W2980501053 hasRelatedWork W1917222627 @default.
- W2980501053 hasRelatedWork W2106247007 @default.
- W2980501053 hasRelatedWork W2130768744 @default.
- W2980501053 hasRelatedWork W2191330771 @default.
- W2980501053 hasRelatedWork W2300872734 @default.
- W2980501053 hasRelatedWork W2670739304 @default.
- W2980501053 hasRelatedWork W2932467891 @default.
- W2980501053 hasRelatedWork W3036903182 @default.
- W2980501053 hasRelatedWork W3124535137 @default.
- W2980501053 hasRelatedWork W3125038212 @default.
- W2980501053 hasRelatedWork W3125124165 @default.
- W2980501053 hasRelatedWork W3125324756 @default.
- W2980501053 hasRelatedWork W3138311255 @default.
- W2980501053 hasRelatedWork W3167380489 @default.
- W2980501053 hasRelatedWork W3185995546 @default.
- W2980501053 hasRelatedWork W3190225935 @default.
- W2980501053 hasRelatedWork W338638063 @default.
- W2980501053 hasRelatedWork W1951594247 @default.
- W2980501053 hasVolume "67" @default.
- W2980501053 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2980501053 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2980501053 magId "2980501053" @default.
- W2980501053 workType "article" @default.