FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2980682802> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2980682802 abstract "Abstract Background The new generation thinner-strut silicon carbide (SiC) coated cobalt chromium (CoCr) bare-metal stents (BMS) are designed to accelerate rapid endothelialisation and reduce thrombogenicity when implanted in coronary arteries. However, smaller studies suggest higher rates of symptomatic restenosis in patients receiving the newer generation BMS. We investigated the efficacy of a newer generation ultrathin strut silicon-carbide coated cobalt-chromium (CoCr) BMS (SCC-BMS) as compared to an older thin-strut uncoated CoCr BMS (UC-BMS) in patients presenting with coronary artery disease requiring stenting of large vessels (≥3.0 mm). Methods All patients randomized to SCC- ( n = 761) or UC-BMS ( n = 765) in the two BASKET-PROVE trials were included. Design, patients, interventions and follow-up were similar between trials except differing regimens of dual antiplatelet therapy. The primary endpoint was clinically driven target-vessel revascularization within 24 months. Safety endpoints of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST) were also assessed. We used inverse probability weighted proportional hazards Cox regressions adjusting for known confounders. Results Demographics, clinical presentation, and risk factors were comparable between the groups, but patients receiving SCC-BMS underwent less complex procedures. The risk for clinically driven TVR was increased om the SCC-BMS group compared to the UC-BMS group (cumulative incidence, 10.6% vs. 8.4%; adjusted relative hazard [HR], 1.49 [95% CI, 1.05–2.10]). No differences in safety endpoints were detected, cardiac death (1.6% vs. 2.8%; HR, 0.62 [CI, 0.30–1.27]), non-fatal MI (3.2% vs. 2.5%; HR, 1.56 [CI, 0.83–2.91]), and definite/probable ST (0.8% vs. 1.1%; HR, 1.17 [CI, 0.39–3.50]). Differences in strut thickness between the two stents did not explain the association between stent type and clinically driven TVR. Conclusions In patients requiring stenting of large coronary arteries, use of the newer generation SCC-BMS was associated with a higher risk of clinically driven repeat revascularization compared to the UC-BMS with no signs of an offsetting safety benefit." @default.
• W2980682802 created "2019-10-25" @default.
• W2980682802 creator A5010017598 @default.
• W2980682802 creator A5022176990 @default.
• W2980682802 creator A5041594336 @default.
• W2980682802 creator A5053779611 @default.
• W2980682802 creator A5076365423 @default.
• W2980682802 creator A5082017828 @default.
• W2980682802 creator A5085749657 @default.
• W2980682802 creator A5089158851 @default.
• W2980682802 date "2019-10-16" @default.
• W2980682802 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2980682802 title "Do ultrathin strut bare-metal stents with passive coating improve efficacy in large coronary arteries? Insights from the randomized, multicenter BASKET-PROVE trials" @default.
• W2980682802 cites W1482026388 @default.
• W2980682802 cites W1973617793 @default.
• W2980682802 cites W1973964569 @default.
• W2980682802 cites W1976855765 @default.
• W2980682802 cites W1980710226 @default.
• W2980682802 cites W2004495524 @default.
• W2980682802 cites W2007293982 @default.
• W2980682802 cites W2022417631 @default.
• W2980682802 cites W2029062376 @default.
• W2980682802 cites W2037898549 @default.
• W2980682802 cites W2040113464 @default.
• W2980682802 cites W2045090740 @default.
• W2980682802 cites W2062782229 @default.
• W2980682802 cites W2079612181 @default.
• W2980682802 cites W2079652504 @default.
• W2980682802 cites W2087150869 @default.
• W2980682802 cites W2107406419 @default.
• W2980682802 cites W2139804268 @default.
• W2980682802 cites W2149258443 @default.
• W2980682802 cites W2169387542 @default.
• W2980682802 cites W2346155167 @default.
• W2980682802 cites W2747702104 @default.
• W2980682802 cites W2777390079 @default.
• W2980682802 cites W2796711492 @default.
• W2980682802 cites W4239728164 @default.
• W2980682802 cites W4292948591 @default.
• W2980682802 cites W584804003 @default.
• W2980682802 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-019-1199-8" @default.
• W2980682802 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6796469" @default.
• W2980682802 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31619181" @default.
• W2980682802 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2980682802 type Work @default.
• W2980682802 sameAs 2980682802 @default.
• W2980682802 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2980682802 countsByYear W29806828022021 @default.
• W2980682802 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2980682802 hasAuthorship W2980682802A5010017598 @default.
• W2980682802 hasAuthorship W2980682802A5022176990 @default.
• W2980682802 hasAuthorship W2980682802A5041594336 @default.
• W2980682802 hasAuthorship W2980682802A5053779611 @default.
• W2980682802 hasAuthorship W2980682802A5076365423 @default.
• W2980682802 hasAuthorship W2980682802A5082017828 @default.
• W2980682802 hasAuthorship W2980682802A5085749657 @default.
• W2980682802 hasAuthorship W2980682802A5089158851 @default.
• W2980682802 hasBestOaLocation W29806828021 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConcept C203092338 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConcept C207103383 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConcept C2776649359 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConcept C2776820930 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConcept C2777546689 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConcept C2778213512 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConcept C2778283817 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConcept C2778583881 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConcept C2778742706 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConcept C2779983491 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConcept C2780868729 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConcept C500558357 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConcept C72563966 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConcept C88879693 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConceptScore W2980682802C126322002 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConceptScore W2980682802C141071460 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConceptScore W2980682802C164705383 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConceptScore W2980682802C168563851 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConceptScore W2980682802C203092338 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConceptScore W2980682802C207103383 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConceptScore W2980682802C2776649359 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConceptScore W2980682802C2776820930 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConceptScore W2980682802C2777546689 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConceptScore W2980682802C2778213512 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConceptScore W2980682802C2778283817 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConceptScore W2980682802C2778583881 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConceptScore W2980682802C2778742706 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConceptScore W2980682802C2779983491 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConceptScore W2980682802C2780868729 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConceptScore W2980682802C44249647 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConceptScore W2980682802C500558357 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConceptScore W2980682802C71924100 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConceptScore W2980682802C72563966 @default.
• W2980682802 hasConceptScore W2980682802C88879693 @default.
• W2980682802 hasFunder F4320309883 @default.
• W2980682802 hasLocation W29806828021 @default.

• next