FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2980839375> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2980839375 endingPage "913.e3" @default.
• W2980839375 startingPage "902" @default.
• W2980839375 abstract "Endovenous thermal ablation (TA) offers an effective initial treatment option for superficial venous incompetence of the lower limb. These techniques offer lower complication rates with similar efficacy to traditional open surgery. In recent years, nonthermal ablation (NTA) in the form of mechanochemical ablation and cyanoacrylate vein ablation has been suggested to further reduce perioperative morbidity. This study aimed to compare the use of both thermal and nonthermal endovenous ablative techniques in the management of superficial venous incompetence.A search of online databases including MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane database was last performed in January 2019. Comparative studies comparing NTA with TA were included. The primary outcome was technical success. Secondary outcomes included operative pain, complications, modification of disease severity, and quality of life.Six studies describing the outcomes of 1236 participants and 1256 truncal ablations were included for analysis. Follow-up ranged from 6 weeks to 36 months. With regard to overall technical success, 458 of 483 (94.8%) receiving NTA and 521 of 553 (94.2%) undergoing TA had successful truncal ablation on follow-up ultrasound imaging at the study end point (pooled risk ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99-1.04). Subgroup analysis identified no difference in success between groups during immediate, 6-month, 12-month, or >12-month follow-up periods. Postprocedural pain was generally lower in those undergoing NTA with a mean difference of -18.11 (95% CI, -36.7 to 0.48). Techniques experienced significatly lower rates of ecchymosis (risk ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23-0.78), with no difference identified with regard to rates of paresthesia, phlebitis, and skin pigmentation. Further assessment of quality of life (mean difference, -0.27; 95% CI, -0.57 to 0.04) and Venous Clinical Severity Score (-0.52; 95% CI, -1.05 to 0.01) revealed no difference between groups. Included data were deemed of moderate methodologic quality.Nonthermal techniques are as effective as standard TA in the first year and, in some studies, may be associated with less procedural pain. These data suggest that NTA offers an alternative and safe means to treat superficial venous disease. There is, however, a need for further powered trials with larger numbers of patients and longer follow-up to definitively examine this hypothesis." @default.
• W2980839375 created "2019-10-25" @default.
• W2980839375 creator A5006511664 @default.
• W2980839375 creator A5007921296 @default.
• W2980839375 creator A5015451241 @default.
• W2980839375 creator A5031027130 @default.
• W2980839375 creator A5042348711 @default.
• W2980839375 creator A5043164363 @default.
• W2980839375 creator A5044625644 @default.
• W2980839375 creator A5069976081 @default.
• W2980839375 creator A5084747491 @default.
• W2980839375 date "2019-11-01" @default.
• W2980839375 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2980839375 title "A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies comparing nonthermal versus thermal endovenous ablation in superficial venous incompetence" @default.
• W2980839375 cites W1534181333 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W1952298078 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W1968866389 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W1978538314 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W1983845869 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W2042195357 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W2074425668 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W2091057406 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W2100951211 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W2101587108 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W2103331094 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W2109133579 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W2111987503 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W2114488753 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W2123446449 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W2130190918 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W2132987028 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W2148449092 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W2167096084 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W2170892587 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W2274775914 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W2320127988 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W2339199266 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W2399126058 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W2508754946 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W2510150588 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W2574007960 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W2594321157 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W2621305207 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W2737342200 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W2792993209 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W2808358447 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W2900307265 @default.
• W2980839375 cites W746050576 @default.
• W2980839375 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.06.009" @default.
• W2980839375 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31627874" @default.
• W2980839375 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2980839375 type Work @default.
• W2980839375 sameAs 2980839375 @default.
• W2980839375 citedByCount "27" @default.
• W2980839375 countsByYear W29808393752020 @default.
• W2980839375 countsByYear W29808393752021 @default.
• W2980839375 countsByYear W29808393752022 @default.
• W2980839375 countsByYear W29808393752023 @default.
• W2980839375 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2980839375 hasAuthorship W2980839375A5006511664 @default.
• W2980839375 hasAuthorship W2980839375A5007921296 @default.
• W2980839375 hasAuthorship W2980839375A5015451241 @default.
• W2980839375 hasAuthorship W2980839375A5031027130 @default.
• W2980839375 hasAuthorship W2980839375A5042348711 @default.
• W2980839375 hasAuthorship W2980839375A5043164363 @default.
• W2980839375 hasAuthorship W2980839375A5044625644 @default.
• W2980839375 hasAuthorship W2980839375A5069976081 @default.
• W2980839375 hasAuthorship W2980839375A5084747491 @default.
• W2980839375 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2980839375 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2980839375 hasConcept C187960798 @default.
• W2980839375 hasConcept C2778902805 @default.
• W2980839375 hasConcept C2779663748 @default.
• W2980839375 hasConcept C31174226 @default.
• W2980839375 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2980839375 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2980839375 hasConcept C81182388 @default.
• W2980839375 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2980839375 hasConceptScore W2980839375C126322002 @default.
• W2980839375 hasConceptScore W2980839375C141071460 @default.
• W2980839375 hasConceptScore W2980839375C187960798 @default.
• W2980839375 hasConceptScore W2980839375C2778902805 @default.
• W2980839375 hasConceptScore W2980839375C2779663748 @default.
• W2980839375 hasConceptScore W2980839375C31174226 @default.
• W2980839375 hasConceptScore W2980839375C44249647 @default.
• W2980839375 hasConceptScore W2980839375C71924100 @default.
• W2980839375 hasConceptScore W2980839375C81182388 @default.
• W2980839375 hasConceptScore W2980839375C95190672 @default.
• W2980839375 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2980839375 hasLocation W29808393751 @default.
• W2980839375 hasLocation W29808393752 @default.
• W2980839375 hasOpenAccess W2980839375 @default.
• W2980839375 hasPrimaryLocation W29808393751 @default.
• W2980839375 hasRelatedWork W1048882278 @default.
• W2980839375 hasRelatedWork W2368317408 @default.
• W2980839375 hasRelatedWork W2414366497 @default.
• W2980839375 hasRelatedWork W2417961914 @default.
• W2980839375 hasRelatedWork W2474039552 @default.

• next