FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2981200897> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2981200897 endingPage "213" @default.
• W2981200897 startingPage "207" @default.
• W2981200897 abstract "The use of mechanical tissue removal systems is more frequently implemented as the first line approach for the treatment of intrauterine pathology. Scientific evidence is provided that their use is easier and faster than the conventional resectoscope. It is necessary to objectively evaluate the results on tissue removal systems for the treatment of endometrial pathology as the reports in the literature are still conflicting.To review and compare mechanical hysteroscopic tissue removal systems (Truclear®, Myosure® or IBS®) versus conventional bipolar and monopolar resectoscopy for the treatment of polyp and myoma removal. Operation time, completeness of tissue removal, complication rate, fluid deficit, tolerability and learning curve were evaluated.Electronic databases PubMed; Medline and Web of Science were searched for papers published from 1st January 2010 to 1st May 2019 using terms: (hysteroscopic or hysteroscopy or hysteroscopic surgery) and (myoma or polyps). Studies were included if they were retrospective, observational and prospective randomized clinical controlled trials if they investigated the techniques between the tissue removal systems (Truclear®, Myosure® or IBS®) and conventional resectoscopy for the treatment of intrauterine pathology. Data were extracted from the included studies by two independent reviewers. Meta-analysis was performed by Rev Man 5 software (Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK). Results: Overall, 498 patients were analysed from five studies in which there was no difference in age and size of pathology treated either by the hysteroscopic tissue removal systems and the conventional resectoscope. Hysteroscopic tissue removal systems showed a significantly higher success rate of complete endometrial pathology removal (P=0.002) and a significantly shorter operation time for polyp removal (P<0.0001) compared to conventional resectoscopy. No significant differences, in terms of complications rate, were found (P=0.09). The fluid deficit was significantly higher in the tissue removal system group, compared to conventional resectoscopy (P=0.02).Hysteroscopic tissue removal systems showed a major advantage in successful removal of the pathology and total operation time. It is likely that the tissue removal systems are more accessible and have a lower complication profile including perforation, via falsa and bleeding due to its specific action mechanism and shorter operation time but higher-quality trials will be required to confirm this hypothesis." @default.
• W2981200897 created "2019-10-25" @default.
• W2981200897 creator A5002119847 @default.
• W2981200897 creator A5005838535 @default.
• W2981200897 creator A5020149809 @default.
• W2981200897 creator A5037737120 @default.
• W2981200897 creator A5057683878 @default.
• W2981200897 creator A5084753924 @default.
• W2981200897 creator A5089870949 @default.
• W2981200897 date "2018-12-01" @default.
• W2981200897 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2981200897 title "Hysteroscopic tissue removal systems for the treatment of intrauterine pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis." @default.
• W2981200897 cites W1974002156 @default.
• W2981200897 cites W1977416672 @default.
• W2981200897 cites W2005765964 @default.
• W2981200897 cites W2015771685 @default.
• W2981200897 cites W2033049874 @default.
• W2981200897 cites W2049208029 @default.
• W2981200897 cites W2084047927 @default.
• W2981200897 cites W2099508611 @default.
• W2981200897 cites W2117649640 @default.
• W2981200897 cites W2140616362 @default.
• W2981200897 cites W2166269950 @default.
• W2981200897 cites W2169696954 @default.
• W2981200897 cites W2312351731 @default.
• W2981200897 cites W2345261917 @default.
• W2981200897 cites W2346432450 @default.
• W2981200897 cites W2417430527 @default.
• W2981200897 cites W2420135994 @default.
• W2981200897 cites W2514513706 @default.
• W2981200897 cites W2594289003 @default.
• W2981200897 cites W2794495507 @default.
• W2981200897 cites W2896717209 @default.
• W2981200897 cites W4293252648 @default.
• W2981200897 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6658200" @default.
• W2981200897 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31367293" @default.
• W2981200897 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2981200897 type Work @default.
• W2981200897 sameAs 2981200897 @default.
• W2981200897 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2981200897 countsByYear W29812008972020 @default.
• W2981200897 countsByYear W29812008972021 @default.
• W2981200897 countsByYear W29812008972022 @default.
• W2981200897 countsByYear W29812008972023 @default.
• W2981200897 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2981200897 hasAuthorship W2981200897A5002119847 @default.
• W2981200897 hasAuthorship W2981200897A5005838535 @default.
• W2981200897 hasAuthorship W2981200897A5020149809 @default.
• W2981200897 hasAuthorship W2981200897A5037737120 @default.
• W2981200897 hasAuthorship W2981200897A5057683878 @default.
• W2981200897 hasAuthorship W2981200897A5084753924 @default.
• W2981200897 hasAuthorship W2981200897A5089870949 @default.
• W2981200897 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2981200897 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2981200897 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2981200897 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2981200897 hasConcept C197934379 @default.
• W2981200897 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2981200897 hasConcept C2775963564 @default.
• W2981200897 hasConcept C2778148763 @default.
• W2981200897 hasConcept C2778375690 @default.
• W2981200897 hasConcept C2779066055 @default.
• W2981200897 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2981200897 hasConcept C2909633097 @default.
• W2981200897 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2981200897 hasConceptScore W2981200897C126322002 @default.
• W2981200897 hasConceptScore W2981200897C141071460 @default.
• W2981200897 hasConceptScore W2981200897C168563851 @default.
• W2981200897 hasConceptScore W2981200897C17744445 @default.
• W2981200897 hasConceptScore W2981200897C197934379 @default.
• W2981200897 hasConceptScore W2981200897C199539241 @default.
• W2981200897 hasConceptScore W2981200897C2775963564 @default.
• W2981200897 hasConceptScore W2981200897C2778148763 @default.
• W2981200897 hasConceptScore W2981200897C2778375690 @default.
• W2981200897 hasConceptScore W2981200897C2779066055 @default.
• W2981200897 hasConceptScore W2981200897C2779473830 @default.
• W2981200897 hasConceptScore W2981200897C2909633097 @default.
• W2981200897 hasConceptScore W2981200897C71924100 @default.
• W2981200897 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2981200897 hasLocation W29812008971 @default.
• W2981200897 hasOpenAccess W2981200897 @default.
• W2981200897 hasPrimaryLocation W29812008971 @default.
• W2981200897 hasRelatedWork W139984378 @default.
• W2981200897 hasRelatedWork W2036380710 @default.
• W2981200897 hasRelatedWork W2347372739 @default.
• W2981200897 hasRelatedWork W2359807679 @default.
• W2981200897 hasRelatedWork W2369193336 @default.
• W2981200897 hasRelatedWork W2383955702 @default.
• W2981200897 hasRelatedWork W2391454240 @default.
• W2981200897 hasRelatedWork W2391893041 @default.
• W2981200897 hasRelatedWork W2393698673 @default.
• W2981200897 hasRelatedWork W2972288438 @default.
• W2981200897 hasVolume "10" @default.
• W2981200897 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2981200897 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2981200897 magId "2981200897" @default.
• W2981200897 workType "article" @default.