Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2981444738> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2981444738 endingPage "e15415" @default.
- W2981444738 startingPage "e15415" @default.
- W2981444738 abstract "Background User-friendly information at the point of care should be well structured, rapidly accessible, and comprehensive. Also, this information should be trustworthy, as it will be used by health care practitioners to practice evidence-based medicine. Therefore, a standard, validated tool to evaluate the trustworthiness of such point-of-care information resources is needed. Objective This systematic review sought to search for tools to assess the trustworthiness of point-of-care resources and to describe and analyze the content of these tools. Methods A systematic search was performed on three sources: (1) we searched online for initiatives that worked off of the trustworthiness of medical information; (2) we searched Medline (PubMed) until June 2019 for relevant literature; and (3) we scanned reference lists and lists of citing papers via Web of Science for each retrieved paper. We included all studies, reports, websites, or methodologies that reported on tools that assessed the trustworthiness of medical information for professionals. From the selected studies, we extracted information on the general characteristics of the tools. As no standard, risk-of-bias assessment instruments are available for these types of studies, we described how each tool was developed, including any assessments on reliability and validity. We analyzed the criteria used in the different tools and divided them into five categories: (1) author-related information; (2) evidence-based methodology; (3) website quality; (4) website design and usability; and (5) website interactivity. The percentage of tools in compliance with these categories and the different criteria were calculated. Results Included in this review was a total of 17 tools, all published between 1997 and 2018. The tools were developed for different purposes, from a general quality assessment of medical information to very detailed analyses, all specifically for point-of-care resources. However, the development process of the tools was poorly described. Overall, seven tools had a scoring system implemented, two were assessed for reliability only, and two other tools were assessed for both validity and reliability. The content analysis showed that all the tools assessed criteria related to an evidence-based methodology: 82% of the tools assessed author-related information, 71% assessed criteria related to website quality, 71% assessed criteria related to website design and usability, and 47% of the tools assessed criteria related to website interactivity. There was significant variability in criteria used, as some were very detailed while others were more broadly defined. Conclusions The 17 included tools encompass a variety of items important for the assessment of the trustworthiness of point-of-care information. Overall, two tools were assessed for both reliability and validity, but they lacked some essential criteria for the assessment of the trustworthiness of medical information for use at the point-of-care. Currently, a standard, validated tool does not exist. The results of this review may contribute to the development of such an instrument, which may enhance the quality of point-of-care information in the long term. Trial Registration PROSPERO CRD42019122565; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=122565" @default.
- W2981444738 created "2019-11-01" @default.
- W2981444738 creator A5011139935 @default.
- W2981444738 creator A5017080192 @default.
- W2981444738 creator A5028039134 @default.
- W2981444738 creator A5029579175 @default.
- W2981444738 creator A5036521051 @default.
- W2981444738 creator A5046072499 @default.
- W2981444738 creator A5046293602 @default.
- W2981444738 creator A5062275470 @default.
- W2981444738 date "2020-01-17" @default.
- W2981444738 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
- W2981444738 title "Tools to Assess the Trustworthiness of Evidence-Based Point-of-Care Information for Health Care Professionals: Systematic Review" @default.
- W2981444738 cites W14865390 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W183711213 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W1962543528 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W1976779446 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W1992157430 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W2014980529 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W2022515531 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W2024814039 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W2026713096 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W2034349775 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W2040440409 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W2061086447 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W2073644162 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W2080994524 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W2082209838 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W2094340711 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W2098239502 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W2103224468 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W2106952837 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W2123109647 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W2140726322 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W2150631166 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W2156098321 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W2189104558 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W2270681624 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W2396291300 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W2468996569 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W2756578555 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W2896977428 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W4292361644 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W4300958862 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W5119304 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W144399235 @default.
- W2981444738 cites W2275231136 @default.
- W2981444738 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/15415" @default.
- W2981444738 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6996752" @default.
- W2981444738 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31951213" @default.
- W2981444738 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W2981444738 type Work @default.
- W2981444738 sameAs 2981444738 @default.
- W2981444738 citedByCount "16" @default.
- W2981444738 countsByYear W29814447382020 @default.
- W2981444738 countsByYear W29814447382021 @default.
- W2981444738 countsByYear W29814447382022 @default.
- W2981444738 countsByYear W29814447382023 @default.
- W2981444738 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2981444738 hasAuthorship W2981444738A5011139935 @default.
- W2981444738 hasAuthorship W2981444738A5017080192 @default.
- W2981444738 hasAuthorship W2981444738A5028039134 @default.
- W2981444738 hasAuthorship W2981444738A5029579175 @default.
- W2981444738 hasAuthorship W2981444738A5036521051 @default.
- W2981444738 hasAuthorship W2981444738A5046072499 @default.
- W2981444738 hasAuthorship W2981444738A5046293602 @default.
- W2981444738 hasAuthorship W2981444738A5062275470 @default.
- W2981444738 hasBestOaLocation W29814447381 @default.
- W2981444738 hasConcept C107457646 @default.
- W2981444738 hasConcept C108827166 @default.
- W2981444738 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
- W2981444738 hasConcept C141330323 @default.
- W2981444738 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W2981444738 hasConcept C144430266 @default.
- W2981444738 hasConcept C153701036 @default.
- W2981444738 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
- W2981444738 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W2981444738 hasConcept C170130773 @default.
- W2981444738 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2981444738 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
- W2981444738 hasConcept C19648533 @default.
- W2981444738 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2981444738 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
- W2981444738 hasConcept C2522767166 @default.
- W2981444738 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
- W2981444738 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2981444738 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
- W2981444738 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2981444738 hasConceptScore W2981444738C107457646 @default.
- W2981444738 hasConceptScore W2981444738C108827166 @default.
- W2981444738 hasConceptScore W2981444738C136764020 @default.
- W2981444738 hasConceptScore W2981444738C141330323 @default.
- W2981444738 hasConceptScore W2981444738C142724271 @default.
- W2981444738 hasConceptScore W2981444738C144430266 @default.
- W2981444738 hasConceptScore W2981444738C153701036 @default.
- W2981444738 hasConceptScore W2981444738C160735492 @default.
- W2981444738 hasConceptScore W2981444738C162324750 @default.
- W2981444738 hasConceptScore W2981444738C170130773 @default.