FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2982036859> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2982036859 endingPage "e330" @default.
• W2982036859 startingPage "e325" @default.
• W2982036859 abstract "Abstract Introduction Cohesion within military teams is not only vital to their performance but also modulates the adverse impact of work stressors on mental health, including depression, distress, and morale. This study stems from previous findings concerning cohesion during recruit training in the Australian Army. In that study, ratings of cohesion clustered on three dimensions, namely horizontal bonding among team members, vertical bonding with leaders, and organizational bonding with the wider army. Ratings on all three dimensions increased during recruit training, similar to what has been during U.S. Army basic training. The present study takes the next step, which is to determine the relationship between team cohesion and external measures of group performance during training in three types of military occupational specialty, specifically, infantry, quartermaster, and administrative clerk. Materials and Methods The final sample of respondents consisted of 261 infantry trainees, 22 quartermaster trainees, and 39 administrative clerk trainees. These sample sizes, their gender distribution (9% female), and age distribution are proportional to their representation in the Australian Army. The questionnaires given to trainees and their instructors were adapted from Siebold and Kelly’s Platoon Cohesion Index used for measuring the types of bonding within a team. The questionnaire for trainees was administered three times during their respective courses. The cohesion questionnaire for instructors was administered at the completion of training. This study was conducted under defence ethics approval DPR-LREP 069-15. Results The trainees’ ratings of horizontal, vertical, and organizational bonding generally started at a high value and further increased throughout each of the three courses. Vertical bonding tended to be higher than the horizontal bonding, which in turn was consistently higher than organizational bonding. At the end of each course, the trainees’ ratings of horizontal bonding had a large significant correlation with their instructors’ ratings of the trainees’ horizontal bonding (r = 0.70), while the ratings of vertical bonding by the trainees versus their instructors had a smaller correlation (r = 0.21). In relation to the trainees’ individual grades on their course, the trainees’ grades were not significantly correlated with their section’s horizontal bonding (r = 0.29), while their section’s mean grade was correlated with their instructors’ ratings of horizontal bonding (r = 0.44). Conclusions The present results during military occupational specialty training paralleled previous findings that Australian Army recruits quickly developed solid team cohesion early in their training, which generally continued to rise in all three courses. Furthermore, as seen previously with recruits, vertical bonding between section members in all three courses and their instructor leaders tended to be higher than horizontal bonding among team members, which in turn was higher than vertical bonding of the trainees with the wider Army. These findings have useful implications for health professionals. When discussing feelings of depression, distress, and low morale, health professionals might explore a military member’s sense of bonding with their team members, their leaders, and their wider organization as possible contributors to their concerns. By the same token, advice aimed at promoting cohesion may help evoke their protective effects." @default.
• W2982036859 created "2019-11-01" @default.
• W2982036859 creator A5014926290 @default.
• W2982036859 creator A5089330357 @default.
• W2982036859 date "2019-10-23" @default.
• W2982036859 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2982036859 title "Cohesion and Performance in Military Occupation Specialty Training" @default.
• W2982036859 cites W1978530841 @default.
• W2982036859 cites W2019370645 @default.
• W2982036859 cites W2037557484 @default.
• W2982036859 cites W2045997031 @default.
• W2982036859 cites W2313255256 @default.
• W2982036859 cites W2329596378 @default.
• W2982036859 cites W2900263817 @default.
• W2982036859 cites W2912734642 @default.
• W2982036859 cites W388187138 @default.
• W2982036859 cites W4249786472 @default.
• W2982036859 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usz217" @default.
• W2982036859 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31642492" @default.
• W2982036859 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2982036859 type Work @default.
• W2982036859 sameAs 2982036859 @default.
• W2982036859 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2982036859 countsByYear W29820368592020 @default.
• W2982036859 countsByYear W29820368592022 @default.
• W2982036859 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2982036859 hasAuthorship W2982036859A5014926290 @default.
• W2982036859 hasAuthorship W2982036859A5089330357 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConcept C104054115 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConcept C111226992 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConcept C139265228 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConcept C198766705 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConcept C20387591 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConcept C2778476105 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConceptScore W2982036859C104054115 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConceptScore W2982036859C111226992 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConceptScore W2982036859C118552586 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConceptScore W2982036859C139265228 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConceptScore W2982036859C15744967 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConceptScore W2982036859C162324750 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConceptScore W2982036859C17744445 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConceptScore W2982036859C178790620 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConceptScore W2982036859C185592680 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConceptScore W2982036859C187736073 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConceptScore W2982036859C198766705 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConceptScore W2982036859C199539241 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConceptScore W2982036859C20387591 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConceptScore W2982036859C2778476105 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConceptScore W2982036859C509550671 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConceptScore W2982036859C70410870 @default.
• W2982036859 hasConceptScore W2982036859C71924100 @default.
• W2982036859 hasIssue "3-4" @default.
• W2982036859 hasLocation W29820368591 @default.
• W2982036859 hasOpenAccess W2982036859 @default.
• W2982036859 hasPrimaryLocation W29820368591 @default.
• W2982036859 hasRelatedWork W2034615145 @default.
• W2982036859 hasRelatedWork W2350735988 @default.
• W2982036859 hasRelatedWork W2516302411 @default.
• W2982036859 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2982036859 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2982036859 hasRelatedWork W3082382535 @default.
• W2982036859 hasRelatedWork W3092130936 @default.
• W2982036859 hasRelatedWork W3211394597 @default.
• W2982036859 hasRelatedWork W3212072025 @default.
• W2982036859 hasRelatedWork W4221026835 @default.
• W2982036859 hasVolume "185" @default.
• W2982036859 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2982036859 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2982036859 magId "2982036859" @default.
• W2982036859 workType "article" @default.