Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2982485635> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 57 of
57
with 100 items per page.
- W2982485635 endingPage "844" @default.
- W2982485635 startingPage "823" @default.
- W2982485635 abstract "Abstract This essay explores Jung’s thinking strategies, argumentation patterns, and concept formation processes, and reveals how they distinguish his work from normal present‐day science. Jung doesn’t much appreciate the law of noncontradiction, which is a cornerstone of classical logic, and he doesn’t refrain from using openly ambiguous theoretical terms. It will be pointed out that not only specific archetypes, but the notion of archetype itself, as well as other of Jung’s theoretical notions (energy, including libidinal energy, polarity, integration, wholeness, instinct, symbol, and so on), are consciously ambiguous and thus potentially contradictory. It is shown that this kind of dialectic research strategy and related contradiction‐tolerant and ambiguity‐tolerant methods connect his work to Post‐Kantian German Idealism, Schelling’s and Schopenhauer’s philosophy in particular. However, it was Hegel who, in his Science of Logic , presented a systematic overview of such dialectic principles of reasoning, which were, in the 19 th century, widely applied by German philosophers, theologians, and other scholars. Unfortunately, Jung decided not to study Hegel, but, instead, wrote derogatorily of his work. It will be argued that a Jungian who wants to be conscious of her own argumentation strategies and methods of concept formation should study Hegel’s complex and sophisticated dialectical logic. In addition, it is suggested that Jungian depth psychology might help us to amend the phenomenological deficits of Hegel’s system by providing it with a primal experiential source. This is needed because Hegel’s Geist , due to its intellectual emphasis, is a self‐conscious conceptual totality which advances progressively from stage to stage by guiding itself with the help of dialectical reason ( Vernunft ). It will be shown that if enriched with a proper kind of experiential givenness, which includes the Jungian unconsciousness (with libidinal energy, instincts, and archetypes), Hegelian metaphysics would be able to embrace a seriously aconceptual or preconceptual dimension. Aconceptual experience, which is, for Jung, mainly the instinctual layer of archetypes, remains essentially inaccessible, not only for normal scientific concepts, but for the concepts of any form of dialectics as well." @default.
- W2982485635 created "2019-11-08" @default.
- W2982485635 creator A5047738597 @default.
- W2982485635 date "2019-10-28" @default.
- W2982485635 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2982485635 title "Ambiguity and contradiction: the outlines of Jung’s dialectics" @default.
- W2982485635 cites W1011232681 @default.
- W2982485635 cites W2044288090 @default.
- W2982485635 cites W4252295669 @default.
- W2982485635 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5922.12548" @default.
- W2982485635 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31659763" @default.
- W2982485635 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
- W2982485635 type Work @default.
- W2982485635 sameAs 2982485635 @default.
- W2982485635 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2982485635 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2982485635 hasAuthorship W2982485635A5047738597 @default.
- W2982485635 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W2982485635 hasConcept C13184196 @default.
- W2982485635 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2982485635 hasConcept C27206212 @default.
- W2982485635 hasConcept C2776728590 @default.
- W2982485635 hasConcept C2779577034 @default.
- W2982485635 hasConcept C2780896131 @default.
- W2982485635 hasConcept C32506930 @default.
- W2982485635 hasConcept C49848784 @default.
- W2982485635 hasConceptScore W2982485635C111472728 @default.
- W2982485635 hasConceptScore W2982485635C13184196 @default.
- W2982485635 hasConceptScore W2982485635C138885662 @default.
- W2982485635 hasConceptScore W2982485635C27206212 @default.
- W2982485635 hasConceptScore W2982485635C2776728590 @default.
- W2982485635 hasConceptScore W2982485635C2779577034 @default.
- W2982485635 hasConceptScore W2982485635C2780896131 @default.
- W2982485635 hasConceptScore W2982485635C32506930 @default.
- W2982485635 hasConceptScore W2982485635C49848784 @default.
- W2982485635 hasIssue "5" @default.
- W2982485635 hasLocation W29824856351 @default.
- W2982485635 hasLocation W29824856352 @default.
- W2982485635 hasOpenAccess W2982485635 @default.
- W2982485635 hasPrimaryLocation W29824856351 @default.
- W2982485635 hasRelatedWork W1546805006 @default.
- W2982485635 hasRelatedWork W1997213230 @default.
- W2982485635 hasRelatedWork W2364727607 @default.
- W2982485635 hasRelatedWork W2366640546 @default.
- W2982485635 hasRelatedWork W2753723419 @default.
- W2982485635 hasRelatedWork W2799332305 @default.
- W2982485635 hasRelatedWork W4241808927 @default.
- W2982485635 hasRelatedWork W4312289599 @default.
- W2982485635 hasRelatedWork W77876930 @default.
- W2982485635 hasRelatedWork W864384416 @default.
- W2982485635 hasVolume "64" @default.
- W2982485635 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2982485635 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2982485635 magId "2982485635" @default.
- W2982485635 workType "article" @default.