FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2982499302> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2982499302 abstract "The standard formalist account of Article II’s executive vesting clause is that “the executive power” refers to all the powers and authorities possessed by the executive magistrate in Great Britain prior to the Constitution’s adoption, subject to the assignment of such powers and authorities to the other departments of the national government. In recent papers, a handful of scholars have challenged this “residual vesting” thesis by amassing evidence that “the executive power” textually referred only to the power to carry law into execution, and not to the bundle of other royal prerogatives—for example over foreign affairs and national security—enjoyed by the British monarch. According to the advocates of both accounts, the scope and nature of the executive is dramatically altered depending on which account one adopts. This Article dissents from both views. The executive power was indeed about law-execution, and was not a residual grant of power; but, I argue, both the founding generation and their key guide, Blackstone, likely shared a “thick” understanding of this “executive power.” Their writings and statements suggest that “the executive power,” even in its narrower law-execution sense, plausibly included the powers to appoint, remove, and direct executive officers, and to promulgate regulations, as necessary incidents to law-execution. Not only is this account consistent with Blackstone and the historical meaning of “the executive power,” it better fits the available data from the Constitutional Convention and early practice than either of the other two accounts. The residual vesting thesis requires us to believe that the Committee of Detail ignored the instructions of the delegates in the Constitutional Convention; to infer that the delegates themselves were unaware of the implications of what they had written; and to ignore the fact that not a single opponent of the Constitution during ratification as much as mentioned the possibility of a residual grant. On the other hand, the law-execution thesis, at least a “thin” version of it, may require us to ignore important practices and precedents. The “thick” view of “the executive power” advanced in this Article is the theory of best fit: it is the only one that fits the text, the Framers’ apparent intent, and the historical practice. The upshot of this approach is that the President probably has more power in the domestic sphere than under a thin law-execution account, but less in foreign affairs than under the residual account." @default.
• W2982499302 created "2019-11-08" @default.
• W2982499302 creator A5016324389 @default.
• W2982499302 date "2019-01-01" @default.
• W2982499302 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2982499302 title "In Search of Prerogative" @default.
• W2982499302 doi "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3472108" @default.
• W2982499302 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2982499302 type Work @default.
• W2982499302 sameAs 2982499302 @default.
• W2982499302 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2982499302 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2982499302 hasAuthorship W2982499302A5016324389 @default.
• W2982499302 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2982499302 hasConcept C126053111 @default.
• W2982499302 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2982499302 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W2982499302 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2982499302 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W2982499302 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2982499302 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
• W2982499302 hasConcept C2779670817 @default.
• W2982499302 hasConcept C39376844 @default.
• W2982499302 hasConcept C62139897 @default.
• W2982499302 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2982499302 hasConcept C84425819 @default.
• W2982499302 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2982499302 hasConceptScore W2982499302C121332964 @default.
• W2982499302 hasConceptScore W2982499302C126053111 @default.
• W2982499302 hasConceptScore W2982499302C144024400 @default.
• W2982499302 hasConceptScore W2982499302C163258240 @default.
• W2982499302 hasConceptScore W2982499302C17744445 @default.
• W2982499302 hasConceptScore W2982499302C190253527 @default.
• W2982499302 hasConceptScore W2982499302C199539241 @default.
• W2982499302 hasConceptScore W2982499302C2776154427 @default.
• W2982499302 hasConceptScore W2982499302C2779670817 @default.
• W2982499302 hasConceptScore W2982499302C39376844 @default.
• W2982499302 hasConceptScore W2982499302C62139897 @default.
• W2982499302 hasConceptScore W2982499302C62520636 @default.
• W2982499302 hasConceptScore W2982499302C84425819 @default.
• W2982499302 hasConceptScore W2982499302C94625758 @default.
• W2982499302 hasLocation W29824993021 @default.
• W2982499302 hasOpenAccess W2982499302 @default.
• W2982499302 hasPrimaryLocation W29824993021 @default.
• W2982499302 hasRelatedWork W115918354 @default.
• W2982499302 hasRelatedWork W143212120 @default.
• W2982499302 hasRelatedWork W1489044734 @default.
• W2982499302 hasRelatedWork W1493847867 @default.
• W2982499302 hasRelatedWork W1536106794 @default.
• W2982499302 hasRelatedWork W1569669878 @default.
• W2982499302 hasRelatedWork W1615270512 @default.
• W2982499302 hasRelatedWork W1974490857 @default.
• W2982499302 hasRelatedWork W2314688881 @default.
• W2982499302 hasRelatedWork W2403715871 @default.
• W2982499302 hasRelatedWork W250294820 @default.
• W2982499302 hasRelatedWork W2982346484 @default.
• W2982499302 hasRelatedWork W3089156275 @default.
• W2982499302 hasRelatedWork W3122842776 @default.
• W2982499302 hasRelatedWork W3122906923 @default.
• W2982499302 hasRelatedWork W3123305621 @default.
• W2982499302 hasRelatedWork W3124766006 @default.
• W2982499302 hasRelatedWork W3195901862 @default.
• W2982499302 hasRelatedWork W3212806698 @default.
• W2982499302 hasRelatedWork W3125757621 @default.
• W2982499302 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2982499302 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2982499302 magId "2982499302" @default.
• W2982499302 workType "article" @default.